Literature DB >> 25532846

Bio and nanomaterials based on Fe3O4.

Jia-Kun Xu1, Fang-Fang Zhang2, Jing-Jing Sun3, Jun Sheng3, Fang Wang4, Mi Sun5.   

Abstract

During the past few years, nanoparticles have been used for various applications including, but not limited to, protein immobilization, bioseparation, environmental treatment, biomedical and bioengineering usage, and food analysis. Among all types of nanoparticles, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, especially Fe3O4, have attracted a great deal of attention due to their unique magnetic properties and the ability of being easily chemical modified for improved biocompatibility, dispersibility. This review covers recent advances in the fabrication of functional materials based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles together with their possibilities and limitations for application in different fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25532846      PMCID: PMC6271433          DOI: 10.3390/molecules191221506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Owing to the unique properties, such as superparamagnetism, high surface area, large surface-to-volume ratio, low toxicity, easy separation under external magnetic fields, Fe3O4 nanoparticles have enormous potential in the fields such as immobilization of biomaterials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], bioseparation [11,12,13,14,15], environmental treatment [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], biomedical and bioengineering usage [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], and food analysis [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Various fabrication methods have been developed for the synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, including the physical methods [45,46,47], wet chemical preparation methods [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] and microbial methods [67,68,69]. Since the bare Fe3O4 nanoparticles often have poor stability and dispersity, various modification methods have been exploited to get the soluble and biocompatible Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The resulting modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been extensively used for various applications. In this review, the traditional and modern methods for synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are summarized; the methods for modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are also described. Finally, a variety of practical and potential applications as well as the corresponding limitations of the resulting Fe3O4 nanoparticles are introduced.

2. Methods for Preparation of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

The outstanding potential of Fe3O4 nanoparticles has stimulated the extensive development of the synthetic technologies, which could be broadly classified into three categories: physical, chemical and biological methods. (i) Physical methods, such as electron beam lithography [45], gas-phase deposition [46], and mechanical techniques [47]. Externally controlled tools like traditional workshop or microfabrication equipment are often involved in physical methods, where are used to process materials into the desired shape and order. Although physical methods are easy to perform, it is rather difficult for them to control the particle size. (ii) Wet chemical preparation methods, such as sol-gel synthesis [48,49], oxidation method [50,51], reduction method [52], chemical coprecipitation [53,54], hydrothermal reactions [55,56], solvothermal method [57], thermal decomposition method [58], flow injection synthesis [59], electrochemical method [60,61], aerosol/vapor phase method [62], sonochemical decomposition reactions [63,64], supercritical fluid method [65,66], synthesis using nonreactors [67]. In the case of wet chemical preparation methods, relatively less energy was consumed compared with that of physical methods. Among wet chemical preparation methods, coprecipitation of Fe3+ and Fe2+ salts is a most often employed method to prepare water-borne iron oxide nanoparticles. The size and morphology of the nanoparticles can be controlled by selectively choosing the reaction media, the physical parameters of the reaction, such as precursors, reactant concentration, base (NaOH, ammonium hydroxide, and CH3NH2), ionic strength (N(CH3)4+, CH3NH3+, NH4+, Na+, Li+ and K+), reaction temperature, pH of the media, and also some other factors [68]. For instance, an increase of the mixing rate tends to decrease the particle size. Moreover, inlet of nitrogen into the reaction system that protects against critical oxidation of the magnetite also reduces the particle size when compared to methods without oxygen removal. However, coprecipitation protocol leads to reduced control of particle shape, broad distributions of sizes and aggregation of particles. In general, the size distribution of nanoparticles is an important factor to be considered for a particular application. Some of wet chemical methods can yield efficient control of the particle size by carefully adjusting the involved parameters, including sol-gel method, hydrothermal method, flow injection method, electrochemical method, sonochemical decomposition method, supercritical fluid method and synthesis using nanoreactors. (iii) Microbial method. Microbial method is an environment friendly nanoparticle formation processes which can produce 5–90 nm pure magnetite or metal-substituted magnetite without usage of toxic chemicals in their synthesis process [69,70,71,72]. Microbial method represents an advantageous manufacturing technology with respect to high yield, good reproducibility, and good scalability, as well as low costs and low energy input, but the fermentation process is rather time-consuming. Table 1 shows the summary of various methods for preparing Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Table 1

Comparation between methods for synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles [46,47,73].

MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Physical methodsElectron beam lithographywell controlled inter-particle spacingexpensive and highly complex machines requiring
Gas-phase depositioneasy to performdifficult to control the particle size
Mechanical techniquesno chemicals involvedhighly complex machines requiring and time-consuming
Wet chemical preparation methodsSol-gel synthesisprecisely controlled in size, aspect ratio, and internal structureweak bonding, low wear-resistance, high permeability
Oxidation methoduniform size and narrow size distributionsmall-sized ferrite colloids
Reduction methodsimplehigh reaction temperature
Chemical coprecipitationsimple and efficientnot suitable for the preparation of high pure, accurate stoichiometric phase
Hydrothermal reactionseasy to control particle size and shapeshigh reaction temperature, high pressure
Solvothermal methodeasy to control particle size and shapehigh reaction temperature
Thermal decomposition methodeasy to control particle size and shapeinvolve multiple steps
Flow injection synthesisgood reproducibility and high mixing homogeneity together with a precise control of the processneed continuous or segmented mixing of reagents under a laminar flow regime in a capillary reactor
Electrochemical methodeasy to control particle sizebad reproducibility
Aerosol/vapor phase methodhigh yieldsextremely high temperatures
Sonochemical decomposition reactionsnarrow particle size distributionmechanism not still understood
Supercritical fluid methodefficient control of the particle size, no organic solvents involvedcritical pressure and temperature
Synthesis using nanoreactorsprecisely control the particle sizecomplex condition
Microbial methodsMicrobial incubationenvironmental friendly, high yield, good reproducibility, and good scalability, low costtime-consuming
Comparation between methods for synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles [46,47,73].

3. Modification of Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles

Because of the high surface energy, the naked Fe3O4 nanoparticles are generally unstable and aggregate easily, which strongly affects their dispersion into aqueous medium. In addition, Fe3O4 nanoparticles are highly susceptible to be oxidized to γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in the presence of oxygen [74]. To overcome such limitations, various surface modification methods have been developed to modify the surface of naked Fe3O4 nanoparticles via loading of other chemicals or biological materials during or after the synthesis process to improve the dispersibility, stability, biocompatibility and biodegradability for specific purposes [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. With proper surface modification, the stability, dispersity and biocompatibility of Fe3O4 nanoparticles could be improved, and the oxidation process from Fe3O4 nanoparticles to γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles could be greatly slowed down. The common reagents employed for modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles includes surfactants (such as oleic acid(OA) [35,75], lauric acid [76], alkane sulfonic acids [77], and alkane phosphonic acids) [78], polymers (such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) [79], polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) [80], poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) [81], polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) [82], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [83], polystyrene [84], polyethyleneimine (PEI), and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) [85]) and natural dispersants (chitosan [86,87], dextran [88], gelatin [89], polylactic acids [90], starch [91], albumin [92], liposomes [93], and ethyl cellulose [94]). The methods of modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles mainly include physical immobilization, covalent conjugation, and biologically mediated specific interaction. The advantages and disadvantages of these three immobilization methods are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Comparation between different immobilization methods.

MethodsInteractionsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Physical immobilizationphysical absorption, electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic interactionseasy to perform and recycle, no additional coupling reagents and surface treatment are requirednonspecificity, the binding stability is highly affected by environmental conditions
Covalent conjugationcovalent interactionthe binding process can be rationally regulated with specific functional groupsnonspecificity, the support can’t be recycled
Biologically mediated specific interactionbiologically mediated specific interactionsite-specificsite-selective attachment is desired
Comparation between different immobilization methods. Jadhav et al. prepared oleic acid (OA) functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles using modified wet method, and sodium carbonate was used to improve the biological applicability (Scheme 1) [75]. In another example, Yang et al. synthesized PEG-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles via traditional chemical coprecipitation method, the influence of vapor pressure, molecular weights and amounts of PEG on the structural and paramagnetic properties of PEG-Fe3O4 NPs were investigated [79]. Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized in sealed environment (S-Fe3O4) displayed much high crystalline quality than that synthesized in open environment (O-Fe3O4). The calculated average crystalline size of S-Fe3O4 and O-Fe3O4 is 15.2 nm and 14.5 nm, respectively. Both of the S-Fe3O4 and O-Fe3O4 nanoparticles showed superparamagnetic properties, and the saturation magnetization for S-Fe3O4 and O-Fe3O4 nanoparticles is 44 emu/g and 24 emu/g, respectively. The well-dispersed magnetic PEG-Fe3O4 nanoparticles with better size distribution can be obtained with adding 4 g PEG1000 while sealing the beaker. There were no significant size change caused by the PEG coating. However, the saturation magnetization of PEG-Fe3O4 nanoparticles showed an apparent decrease compared to that of bulk material (92 emu/g), which could be attributed to the surface disorder or spin canting at the surface of nanoparticles. Qu et al. prepared Fe3O4chitosan nanoparticles with core-shell structure [87]. Oleic acid (OA) modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles (MN) were firstly prepared by coprecipitation, chitosan was then added to coat on the surface of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles by physical absorption, and glutaraldehyde was used to crosslink the amino groups on the chitosan. The saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4chitosan nanoparticles (30.7 emu/g) was lower than the pristine Fe3O4 nanoparticles (74.3 emu/g), which could be partly attributed to the existence of the large amount of diamagnetic chitosan in the Fe3O4chitosan nanoparticles.
Scheme 1

Schematic representation for interaction of oleic acid (OA) modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles with sodium carbonate. OA is chemically bound to Fe3O4 nanoparticles by the carboxyl head group (-COOH) and the hydrophobic tail group is free, making it non-dispersible in aqueous medium. The hydrophobic tail in turn interacts with the free OA via hydrophobic interactions. The formulation is stabilized in aqueous medium by ionization of the carboxyl head group of free OA by sodium carbonate, wherein Na+ interact by ionic interactions with COO− group of free OA [75].

Schematic representation for interaction of oleic acid (OA) modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles with sodium carbonate. OA is chemically bound to Fe3O4 nanoparticles by the carboxyl head group (-COOH) and the hydrophobic tail group is free, making it non-dispersible in aqueous medium. The hydrophobic tail in turn interacts with the free OA via hydrophobic interactions. The formulation is stabilized in aqueous medium by ionization of the carboxyl head group of free OA by sodium carbonate, wherein Na+ interact by ionic interactions with COO− group of free OA [75].

4. Applications of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Due to the unique properties, Fe3O4 nanoparticles appear to be very promising for their applications in protein immobilization, bioseparation, environments treatment, biomedical and bioengineering usage, and food analysis.

4.1. Protein Immobilization

Protein immobilization serves as a very effective tool to solve the difficulties encountered in the catalytic application of free enzymes, such as poor stability and hard recovery. It is of vital importance to select proper immobilization basis for protein immobilization. Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been intensively utilized to realize this objective due to its unique magnetic performance, and various practical and economical biocatalysts with improved stability and reusability have been fabricated based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles, which could be easily separated from the reaction medium in the presence of external magnetic field [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114]. Proteins could be immobilized onto Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the manner of physical absorption [95,96,97], covalent bonding [98,99,100,101,102,103,104], and bioconjugation [105,106,107]. Coupling reagents, such as glutaraldehyde [99,100,101,102,108,109,110], 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) [103,104,111,112,113] and sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) [114], are often utilized to achieve much more stable immobilization via covalent bonding because their functional groups can interact with both functional groups of the modified magnetic nanoparticles and proteins. For example, Huang et al. covalently bound glucose oxidase to Fe3O4/silicon dioxide nanoparticles using glutaraldehyde, resulting in an activity of immobilized glucose oxidase of 4570 U/g at pH 7 and 50 °C [102]. The immobilized glucose oxidase retained 80% of its initial activity after 6 h at 45 °C compared to only 20% for the free enzyme. After six cycles of repeated use, the immobilized glucose oxidase still maintained 60% of its initial activity; 75% of its initial activity remained after 1 month at 4 °C compared to 62% for the free enzyme. Hong et al. obtained amine-functionalized magnetic nanogel by Hoffman degradation of the polyacrylamide (PAM)-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. α-Chymotrypsin (CT) covalently bound to the magnetic nanogel with reactive amino groups by using EDC as coupling reagent [104]. The binding capacity was determined to be 61 mg enzyme/g nanogel by BCA protein assay. Specific activity of the immobilized CT was measured to be 0.93 U/(mg min), 59.3% as that of free CT. The immobilized CT still had a remaining activity of 60% when the reaction temperature rose to 60 °C while free CT lost all-initial activity. Wu et al. prepared magnetic Fe3O4-chitosan nanoparticles by cross-linking with TPP, precipitation with NaOH and oxidation with O2 in hydrochloric acid aqueous phase containing chitosan and Fe(OH)2 [114]. The adsorption capacity of the prepared Fe3O4-chitosan nanoparticles to lipase was 129 mg/g; and the maximal enzyme activity was 20.02 μmol·min−1·mg−1 (protein), and 55.6% activity was retained at a certain loading amount.

4.2. Bioseparation

Magnetic separation is a commonly used technique for polypeptide/protein separation and cell separation. Magnetic separation possesses several advantages such as timesaving, gentle, easily automated, and can be directly used to remove target compounds from crude medium by the simple application of an external magnetic field. To construct Fe3O4 based composite nanomaterials for separation, core/shell microspheres are generally fabricated with a Fe3O4 as a core and other functional materials as a shell [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123]. Ma et al. synthesized the Fe3O4@mTiO2 microspheres with a well-defined core/shell structure, the high specific surface area (167.1 m2/g), large pore volume (0.45 cm3/g), appropriate and tunable pore size (8.6–16.4 nm), and high magnetic susceptibility [123]. The composite could selectively enrich phosphopeptides from complex mixtures even at a very low molar ratio of phosphopeptides/non-phosphopeptides (1:1000), large enrichment capacity (as high as 225 mg/g, over 10 times as that of the Fe3O4@TiO2 microspheres), extreme sensitivity (the detection limit was at the fmol level), excellent speed (the enrichment can be completed in less than 5 min), and high recovery of phosphopeptides (as high as 93%). To realize more effective separation of protein, affinity chromatography utilizing Fe3O4 based composites as packing materials is usually taken into account [124]. Several functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been strategically developed for the purification of specific proteins utilizing the affinity interactions. The target protein is firstly captured by modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles from crude samples to form a complex, and the captured target protein on the particles is subsequently eluted from metal ion chelated magnetic nanoparticles by applying buffer solution with different pH or ion strength (Scheme 2). These metal ion chelated magnetic nanoparticles were usually regenerated by using EDTA to strip the adsorbed protein and metal ion and then reloading with metal ion for recycling.
Scheme 2

Illustration of the separation mechanism of affinity chromatography utilizing Fe3O4 based composite as packing material.

Illustration of the separation mechanism of affinity chromatography utilizing Fe3O4 based composite as packing material.

4.3. Environmental Treatment

As a result of rapid industrialization and urbanization, various pollutants particularly those entering aquatic systems have attracted worldwide concern. The development of efficient and cost-effective methods for environmental treatment is of primary concern for sustainable economic and social development. Due to the extremely small particle size, high surface-area-to-volume ratio, and more important the magnetism, Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been widely used and have shown promising performance in environments treatment, including pollutant removal and toxicity mitigation [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,125,126,127,128,129]. Proper surface coating cannot only improve the removal capacity and affinity of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles, but also promote the desorption process. Pollutants generally adsorb to the surface of Fe3O4 nanoparticles through interactions including physical adsorption, ion-exchange, chemical bonding (complexation and/or chelation), hydrogen bonds, and van der Wall forces. Fe3O4/ZrO2/chitosan composite was synthesized and employed for the removal of amaranth and tartrazine dyes removal, the adsorption capacities of which were 99.6 and 47.3 mg/g for amaranth and tartrazine dyes, respectively [128]. In another report, Hakami et al. prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles functionalized with thiol groups by adding (3-mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane on silica-coating to remove Hg, and the sulfur atoms in thiol moieties served as ligands to bind with soft metal cation Hg+. Thiourea was added to facilitate desorption of Hg because of the presence of sulfur atoms (Scheme 3) [129].
Scheme 3

Illustration of the moval and recovery of Hg(II) using thiol-functionalized mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles [129].

Illustration of the moval and recovery of Hg(II) using thiol-functionalized mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles [129]. In the real engineering applications, the strategically utilization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles should consider the complex environmental conditions such as background ions, humic substances, temperature, and pH.

4.4. Biomedical Usage

Fe3O4 nanoparticles with appropriate surface properties have been widely used for numerous biomedical and bioengineering applications such as targeted drug delivery, biosensor, magnetic resonance imaging, hyperthermia, tissue engineering, magnetofection, etc. All these applications require that these nanoparticles not only possess high magnetization values, but also with narrow particle size distribution and similar surface topography, so that the particles have uniform physical and chemical properties. Moreover, the magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications should be non-toxic and biocompatible. In a word, both of the nature and the geometric arrangement of surface coatings on the nanoparticles have apparent influence on bio-kinetics and bio-distribution of nanoparticles in the body.

4.4.1. Targeted Drug Delivery

Due to the unique capabilities (e.g., superparamagnetism and biocompatibility) and the negligible side effects, magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with proper surface modification and conjugated targeting ligands/molecules have become a major research focus for drug delivery applications. Compare to the conventional, non-targeted methods of drug delivery, magnetic nanoparticles are promising drug carriers due to the better specificity to the target site and the reduced adverse effects. Drug carried by magnetic nanoparticles could be concentrated at the desired site to receive much high therapeutic efficiency. Since the drugs simply physically attached to the nanoparticle surface tend to release quickly before reaching the final destination, a core-shell structure consisting of a magnetic core and a shell is preferred in magnetic drug-delivery systems to achieve sufficient drug loading capacity and good transportation effect [130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. For example, Chen et al. prepared Fe3O4@SiO2 core–shell nanoparticles and grafted a widely used anticancer agent doxorubincin (DOX) to the surface of the core–shell nanoparticles via an amide bond with the aid of a spacer arm. Most of the conjugated DOX can release from the nanoparticles within 12 h and the release process prefers low pH conditions. The saturation magnetization value of the obtained superparamagnetic DOX-grafted Fe3O4@SiO2 core-shell structure nanoparticles was 49.3 emu·g−1, indicating its great potential application in the treatment of cancer using magnetic targeting drug-delivery technology [136].

4.4.2. Biosensor

Fe3O4 nanoparticles based bioanalytical sensors could be fabricated by coating Fe3O4 nanoparticles with materials such as a fluorescent one [139,140], a metal [141,142], silica [143,144], or a polymer [145,146]. Tang et al. developed a practical glucose biosensor by combining the intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the anti-interference ability of the nafion film. Glucose oxidase was simply mixed with Fe3O4 nanoparticles and cross-linked on the Pt electrode with chitosan medium by glutaraldehyde, and then covered with a thin nafion film. The biosensor showed high sensitivity (11.54 μAcm−2·mM−1), low detection limit (6 × 10−6 M), and good storage stability [147]. Liu et al. developed a reusable, single-step system for the detection of specific substrates using oxidase-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a bienzyme system and using amplex ultrared (AU) as a fluorogenic substrate. A composite of poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride)-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles and oxidase was prepared for the quantification of specific substrates through the H2O2-mediated oxidation of AU. The reaction process was monitored by checking fluorescence intensity at 587 nm, and the minimum detectable concentrations of glucose, galactose, and choline were found to be 3, 2, and 20 μM utilizing glucose oxidase-Fe3O4, galactose oxidase-Fe3O4, and choline oxidase-Fe3O4 composites, respectively (Scheme 4) [148].
Scheme 4

Illustration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles play a peroxidase-like role to detect the specific substrate in the presence of AU [148].

Illustration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles play a peroxidase-like role to detect the specific substrate in the presence of AU [148].

4.4.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a commonly used non-invasive medical imaging technique in clinical medicine to visualize the structure and function of tissues, which is based on the behavior, alignment and interaction of protons in the presence of an applied magnetic field [149,150,151,152,153]. For example, Fan et al. present a relatively simple and scalable approach for preparing poly(poly(ethyleneglycol) monomethacrylate) (P(PEGMA))-grafted Fe3O4 core–shell nanoparticles with well-controlled properties using a solvent-free ATRP [153]. The so-obtained P(PEGMA)-grafted nanoparticles have a uniform hydrodynamic particle size of 36.0 ± 1.2 nm. The morphology and viability of the macrophage cells cultured in a medium containing 0.2 mg/mL of P(PEGMA)-grafted nanoparticles were found similar to those of cells cultured without nanoparticles, indicating an absence of significant cytotoxicity effects. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of P(PEGMA)-grafted MNPs showed that the magnetic resonance signal is enhanced significantly with increasing nanoparticle concentration in water. The R and R values (longitudinal and transverse relaxivities) per millimole Fe, and R/R value of the P(PEGMA)-grafted MNPs were calculated to be 8.8 mM−1·s−1, 140 mM−1·s−1, and 16, respectively. These results indicate that the P(PEGMA)-grafted nanoparticles have great potential for application in MRI of specific biotargets.

4.4.4. Hyperthermia

Magnetic induction hyperthermia means the exposition of cancer tissues to an alternating magnetic field, in which heat is generated due to magnetic hysteresis loss. Cancer cells exposed to magnetic particles will heat up to a temperature higher than 43 °C, at which the cancer cells are destroyed whereas the normal cells can survive. Much research work using magnetic particles for hyperthermia have manifested a therapeutic effect on several types of tumors [30,31,32,33,154,155,156]. For example, Ghosh et al. synthesized Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MN) capped with either oleic acid (Fe3O4-OA-MN) or polyethylene glycol (Fe3O4-PEG-MN), which were prepared by a co-precipitation method. The average particle sizes of the obtained Fe3O4-MN, Fe3O4-OA-MN and Fe3O4-PEG-MN were found to be 12, 6 and 8 nm, respectively. A 35% increase of killing effect was observed in human breast cancer cells (MCF7) after Fe3O4-OA-MN treatment, which was further enhanced (65%) in the presence of induction heating. However, only 5%–10% killing was achieved while Fe3O4-MN or Fe3O4-PEG-MN was used to treat MCF7 cells after induction heating. The effect of only OA (0.088 mg·mL−1, a concentration low than that in Fe3O4-OA-MN) or PEG (0.1 mg·mL−1) with/without induction heating on cell viability experiments indicated that loss of viability by OA was ~75%, which was higher than 1 mg of Fe3O4-OA-MN (35%) alone. However, PEG at this concentration did not show any significant change in cell toxicity. The same control experiments conducted under induction heating showed insignificant change in cell viability. These results displayed the surface characteristics of the modified magnetic nanoparticles (e.g., lipophilicity) greatly influence their hyperthermia applications in cancer therapy [156].

4.4.5. Tissue Engineering

Tissue engineering is a promising technology for overcoming the organ transplantation crisis, and the fabricated tissue equivalents may also be used to screen the effects of drugs and toxins [157,158]. It has been a great challenge for scientists and medical experts to fabricate functional organs of the similar architectures in vitro to the in vivo organs, in which the cells are allocated precisely. To realize this objective, three-dimensional constructs (scaffolds or hydrogels) functioning similarly as under in vivo conditions should be firstly built up [159,160,161]. The cells generally isolated from a tissue biopsy, cultured in vitro, subsequently seeded into the three dimensional constructs. To achieve an efficient cell seeding and to enable controlled tissue assembly and complex tissue formation, magnetic force-based tissue engineering technique is required to provide magneto-responsive features to the cells [162,163,164]. The inclusion of magnetic particles has no significant effect on the porosity, stability and wetting properties of the composite scaffolds, making them appropriate for cellular support and cultivation. For instance, Sapir et al. created a stimulating microenvironment by inserting magnetically responsive Fe3O4 nanoparticles into a macroporous alginate scaffold, which was suitable for promoting endothelial cell organization into capillary-like structures in vitro [165].

4.4.6. Magnetofection

Magnetofection rely on the delivery of nucleic acids (e.g., DNA, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (AODN), and small interfering ribonucleic acids (siRNA) into the targeted cells in presence of a magnetic field [46]. The delivery of nucleic acids using viral vectors is called transduction, whereas the delivery using nonviral vectors is termed transfection. The negatively charged nucleic acids generally interact with MNPs chemically modified by cationic substances such as PEI or protamine sulfate polymers [166], which could contribute to the intracellular penetration. The application of an external Fe3O4 magnetic field directs viral or non-viral gene delivery vectors facilitates fast and efficient nucleic acid delivery towards the target cells [167]. Although substantial progress has been made with creating proper delivery systems for nucleic acids, our knowledge of the internal operation mechanism inside cells is still unclear, and target delivery of nucleic acids still has not lived up to its potential clinical application. The processes governing nucleic acid uptake and delivery are far from being clarified, as well as their intracellular interactions, intracellular trafficking and the regulation of nucleic acid action inside cells [46].

4.5. Food Analysis

It is of vital importance to accurately analyze food components and food contaminants for ensuring food safety and quality. Although the frequently employed techniques (e.g., gas chromatography (GC), culture and colony counting, immunoassay, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)) are of very great usage for food analysis, most of them are laborious, complex, time-consuming, expensive, and show somewhat dissatisfying specificity and detectability to some special targets. Magnetic nanoparticles such as Fe3O4 are of special interest for food analysis not only because the unique properties such as low toxicity, good biocompatibility, large specific surface area, high capacity for charge transfer and convenient separation from a reaction mixture with an external magnetic field, but also for the rapid, highly selective and sensitive detection of food contaminants and food components after the proper surface modification. Fe3O4 nanoparticles are usually involved in detection techniques for food analysis in two ways: electrode modifier and sample pre-concentrator [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,168]. Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been widely used in many detection techniques for food analysis, including PCR, immunoassay, HPLC, LC-MS/MS, and optical method. For example, Liu et al. developed a superparamagnetic nano-immunobeads (SPM-NIBs) by conjugation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with specific antibodies (Scheme 5). The prepared SPM-NIBs showed superior colloidal stability and reversible magnetic response to Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a main foodborne pathogenes from contaminated seafood. About 80% of Vibrio parahaemolyticus cells could be captured when the concentration of the broth was 103 CFU/mL [41].
Scheme 5

Illustration of the process of target bacteria separation using superparamagnetic nano-immunobeads (SPM-NIBs) [41].

Illustration of the process of target bacteria separation using superparamagnetic nano-immunobeads (SPM-NIBs) [41].

5. Concluding Remarks and Prospects

Due to the unique properties (e.g., superparamagnetism, high surface area, large surface-to-volume ratio, low toxicity, and easy separation), Fe3O4 nanoparticles have emerged as ideal frame materials for generating functional materials of different surface architecture, which have already displayed promising effects in practical applications in protein immobilization, bioseparation, biomedical science, environmental treatment, and food analysis. Various Fe3O4 based nanoparticles have already realized their practical applications. However, there are still many Fe3O4 based nanoparticles having not been scaled up from the laboratory scale into industry-level, and several crucial scientific, technical, and economical issues still need to be settled. Therefore, more and more efforts are still required to meet the tremendous demands for advanced materials of modern technology, which might call for interdisciplinary cooperation of material, chemistry, physics, medicine, and other related disciplines.
  16 in total

1.  Pure titanium particle loaded nanocomposites: study on the polymer/filler interface and hMSC biocompatibility.

Authors:  Roberto Avolio; Marietta D'Albore; Vincenzo Guarino; Gennaro Gentile; Maria Cristina Cocca; Stefania Zeppetelli; Maria Emanuela Errico; Maurizio Avella; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Aspects of high-performance and bio-acceptable magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical application.

Authors:  Preeti Kush; Parveen Kumar; Ranjit Singh; Ajeet Kaushik
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 6.598

Review 3.  Magnetic particles for integrated nucleic acid purification, amplification and detection without pipetting.

Authors:  Yanju Chen; Yang Liu; Ya Shi; Jianfeng Ping; Jian Wu; Huan Chen
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 12.296

4.  Magnetic Nanoparticles Conjugated with Peptides Derived from Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 as a Tool for Targeting Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Kao; Po-Ting Wu; Mei-Yi Liao; I-Ju Chung; Kai-Chien Yang; Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng; Jiashing Yu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  Synthesis and properties of magnetic nanotheranostics coated with polyethylene glycol/5-fluorouracil/layered double hydroxide.

Authors:  Mona Ebadi; Bullo Saifullah; Kalaivani Buskaran; Mohd Zobir Hussein; Sharida Fakurazi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-08-19

6.  DNA Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Iron Oxide/Nanocellulose Crystalline Composite Modified Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Mohd Hazani Mat Zaid; Che Engku Noramalina Che-Engku-Chik; Nor Azah Yusof; Jaafar Abdullah; Siti Sarah Othman; Rahizan Issa; Mohd Fairulnizal Md Noh; Helmi Wasoh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Behavior of Fungal Extracellular Synthesized Ag Nanoparticles Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope.

Authors:  Taher A Salaheldin; Sherif M Husseiny; Abdullah M Al-Enizi; Ahmed Elzatahry; Alan H Cowley
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications: A Perspective on Synthesis, Drugs, Antimicrobial Activity, and Toxicity.

Authors:  Laís Salomão Arias; Juliano Pelim Pessan; Ana Paula Miranda Vieira; Taynara Maria Toito de Lima; Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem; Douglas Roberto Monteiro
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-09

Review 9.  Applications of Magnetotactic Bacteria, Magnetosomes and Magnetosome Crystals in Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Mini-Review.

Authors:  Gabriele Vargas; Jefferson Cypriano; Tarcisio Correa; Pedro Leão; Dennis A Bazylinski; Fernanda Abreu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Electrochemical Sensor for Determination of Various Phenolic Compounds in Wine Samples Using Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Modified Carbon Paste Electrode.

Authors:  Pwadubashiyi C Pwavodi; Vasfiye H Ozyurt; Suleyman Asir; Mehmet Ozsoz
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.