AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can be difficult to detect using CT due to poor and heterogeneous contrast. Dual-energy CT (DECT) allows iodine contrast optimization using noise-optimized monoenergetic extrapolations (MEIs) and iodine maps (IMs). Our aim was to assess whether MEI and IM could improve the delineation of thrombotic material within iodine-enhanced blood compared to single-energy CT (SECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six vessel phantoms, including human thrombus and contrast media-enhanced blood and one phantom without contrast, were placed in an attenuation phantom and scanned with DECT 100/140 kV and SECT 120 kV. IM, virtual non-contrast images (VNC), mixed images, and MEI were calculated. Attenuation of thrombi and blood were measured. Contrast and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) were calculated and compared among IM, VNC, mixed images, MEI, and SECT using paired t tests. RESULTS: MEI40keV and IM showed significantly higher contrast and CNR than SE120kV from high to intermediate iodine concentrations (contrast:pMEI40keV < 0.002,pIM < 0.005;CNR:pMEI40keV < 0.002,pIM < 0.004). At low iodine concentrations, MEI190keV and VNC images showed significantly higher contrast and CNR than SE120kV with inverted contrasts (contrast:pMEI190keV < 0.008,pVNC < 0.002;CNR:pMEI190keV < 0.003,pVNC < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Noise-optimized MEI and IM provide significantly higher contrast and CNR in the delineation of thrombosis compared to SECT, which may facilitate the detection of DVT in difficult cases. KEY POINTS: • Poor contrast makes it difficult to detect thrombosis in CT. • Dual-energy-CT allows contrast optimization using monoenergetic extrapolations (MEI) and iodine maps (IM). • Noise-optimized-MEI and IM are significantly superior to single-energy-CT in delineation of thrombosis. • Noise-optimized-MEI and IM may facilitate the detection of deep vein thrombosis.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can be difficult to detect using CT due to poor and heterogeneous contrast. Dual-energy CT (DECT) allows iodine contrast optimization using noise-optimized monoenergetic extrapolations (MEIs) and iodine maps (IMs). Our aim was to assess whether MEI and IM could improve the delineation of thrombotic material within iodine-enhanced blood compared to single-energy CT (SECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six vessel phantoms, including humanthrombus and contrast media-enhanced blood and one phantom without contrast, were placed in an attenuation phantom and scanned with DECT 100/140 kV and SECT 120 kV. IM, virtual non-contrast images (VNC), mixed images, and MEI were calculated. Attenuation of thrombi and blood were measured. Contrast and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) were calculated and compared among IM, VNC, mixed images, MEI, and SECT using paired t tests. RESULTS: MEI40keV and IM showed significantly higher contrast and CNR than SE120kV from high to intermediate iodine concentrations (contrast:pMEI40keV < 0.002,pIM < 0.005;CNR:pMEI40keV < 0.002,pIM < 0.004). At low iodine concentrations, MEI190keV and VNC images showed significantly higher contrast and CNR than SE120kV with inverted contrasts (contrast:pMEI190keV < 0.008,pVNC < 0.002;CNR:pMEI190keV < 0.003,pVNC < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Noise-optimized MEI and IM provide significantly higher contrast and CNR in the delineation of thrombosis compared to SECT, which may facilitate the detection of DVT in difficult cases. KEY POINTS: • Poor contrast makes it difficult to detect thrombosis in CT. • Dual-energy-CT allows contrast optimization using monoenergetic extrapolations (MEI) and iodine maps (IM). • Noise-optimized-MEI and IM are significantly superior to single-energy-CT in delineation of thrombosis. • Noise-optimized-MEI and IM may facilitate the detection of deep vein thrombosis.
Authors: Frederick A Spencer; Cathy Emery; Samuel W Joffe; Luigi Pacifico; Darleen Lessard; George Reed; Joel M Gore; Robert J Goldberg Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martin Beeres; Jesko Trommer; Claudia Frellesen; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Jan E Scholtz; Eva Herrmann; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Jakob Weiss; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Malte Bongers; Christoph Schabel; Stefanie Mangold; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg; Ahmed E Othman Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christian Booz; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Sarah C Metzger; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: C Schabel; M N Bongers; D Ketelsen; R Syha; C Thomas; G Homann; M Notohamiprodjo; K Nikolaou; F Bamberg Journal: Radiologe Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Jakob Weiss; Christoph Schabel; Ahmed E Othman; Georg Bier; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg; Malte N Bongers Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 5.315