OBJECTIVES: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents a major and highly prevalent complication in patients with diabetes mellitus. The diagnostic, non-invasive work-up by computed tomography angiography (CTA) is limited in the presence of extensive calcification. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dual energy CTA (DE-CTA) for the detection and characterization of PAD in patients with diabetes mellitus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 30 diabetic patients with suspected or known PAD were retrospectively included in the analysis. All subjects underwent DE-CTA (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) prior to invasive angiography, which served as the reference standard. Blinded analysis included assessment of the presence and degree of peripheral stenosis on curved multiplanar reformatting (MPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Conventional measures of diagnostic accuracy were derived. RESULTS: Among the 30 subjects included in the analysis (83% male, mean age 70.0 ± 10.5 years, 83% diabetes type 2), the prevalence of critical stenosis in 331 evaluated vessel segments was high (30%). Dual energy CT identified critical stenoses with a high sensitivity and good specificity using curved MPR (100% and 93.1%, respectively) and MIP images (99% and 91.8%, respectively). In stratified analysis, the diagnostic accuracy was higher for stenosis pertaining to the pelvic and thigh vessels as compared with the lower extremities (curved MPR accuracy 97.1% vs. 99.2 vs. 90.9%; respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of DE-CTA allows reliable detection and characterization of peripheral arterial stenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus with higher accuracy in vessels in the pelvic and thigh regions compared with the vessels in the lower legs.
OBJECTIVES:Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents a major and highly prevalent complication in patients with diabetes mellitus. The diagnostic, non-invasive work-up by computed tomography angiography (CTA) is limited in the presence of extensive calcification. The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dual energy CTA (DE-CTA) for the detection and characterization of PAD in patients with diabetes mellitus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 30 diabeticpatients with suspected or known PAD were retrospectively included in the analysis. All subjects underwent DE-CTA (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) prior to invasive angiography, which served as the reference standard. Blinded analysis included assessment of the presence and degree of peripheral stenosis on curved multiplanar reformatting (MPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Conventional measures of diagnostic accuracy were derived. RESULTS: Among the 30 subjects included in the analysis (83% male, mean age 70.0 ± 10.5 years, 83% diabetes type 2), the prevalence of critical stenosis in 331 evaluated vessel segments was high (30%). Dual energy CT identified critical stenoses with a high sensitivity and good specificity using curved MPR (100% and 93.1%, respectively) and MIP images (99% and 91.8%, respectively). In stratified analysis, the diagnostic accuracy was higher for stenosis pertaining to the pelvic and thigh vessels as compared with the lower extremities (curved MPR accuracy 97.1% vs. 99.2 vs. 90.9%; respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of DE-CTA allows reliable detection and characterization of peripheral arterial stenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus with higher accuracy in vessels in the pelvic and thigh regions compared with the vessels in the lower legs.
Authors: Rody Ouwendijk; Marianne de Vries; Peter M T Pattynama; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Michiel W de Haan; Theo Stijnen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Felix G Meinel; Christian Canstein; U Joseph Schoepf; Martin Sedlmaier; Bernhard Schmidt; Brett S Harris; Thomas G Flohr; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; U Joseph Schoepf; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Ralf Lehmann; Sonja Sudarski; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 11.105