Literature DB >> 25528491

Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model.

Randy K Kalkman1, Jeroen J Briaire2, Johan H M Frijns3.   

Abstract

Several multipolar current focussing strategies are examined in a computational model of the implanted human cochlea. The model includes a realistic spatial distribution of cell bodies of the auditory neurons throughout Rosenthal's canal. Simulations are performed of monopolar, (partial) tripolar and phased array stimulation. Excitation patterns, estimated thresholds, electrical dynamic range, excitation density and neural recruitment curves are determined and compared. The main findings are: (I) Current focussing requires electrical field interaction to induce spatially restricted excitation patterns. For perimodiolar electrodes the distance to the neurons is too small to have sufficient electrical field interaction, which results in neural excitation near non-centre contacts. (II) Current focussing only produces spatially restricted excitation patterns when there is little or no excitation occurring in the peripheral processes, either because of geometrical factors or due to neural degeneration. (III) The model predicts that neural recruitment with electrical stimulation is a three-dimensional process; regions of excitation not only expand in apical and basal directions, but also by penetrating deeper into the spiral ganglion. (IV) At equal loudness certain differences between the spatial excitation patterns of various multipoles cannot be simulated in a model containing linearly aligned neurons of identical morphology. Introducing a form of variability in the neurons, such as the spatial distribution of cell bodies in the spiral ganglion used in this study, is therefore essential in the modelling of spread of excitation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Lasker Award>.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528491     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of a high-resolution patient-specific model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  Ahmet Cakir; Robert T Dwyer; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

2.  Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.

Authors:  Shefin S George; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Towards a Complete In Silico Assessment of the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Authors:  Nerea Mangado; Mario Ceresa; Heval Benav; Pavel Mistrik; Gemma Piella; Miguel A González Ballester
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Bobby E Gibbs; Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  A phenomenological computational model of the evoked action potential fitted to human cochlear implant responses.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos-de-Miguel; José M Escobar; David Greiner; Domingo Benítez; Eduardo Rodríguez; Albert Oliver; Marcos Hernández; Ángel Ramos-Macías
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.779

8.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

9.  Combining current focusing and steering in a cochlear implant processing strategy.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu; Kathryn Pulling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  An Instrumented Cochlea Model for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrical Stimulus Spread.

Authors:  Chen Jiang; Shreya Singhal; Thomas Landry; Iwan Roberts; Simone de Rijk; Tim Brochier; Tobias Goehring; Yu Tam; Robert Carlyon; George Malliaras; Manohar Bance
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.