Literature DB >> 14986050

Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications.

Peter Reimer1, Günter Schneider, Wolfgang Schima.   

Abstract

Hepatobiliary contrast agents with uptake into hepatocytes followed by variable biliary excretion represent a unique class of cell-specific MR contrast agents. Two hepatobiliary contrast agents, mangafodipir trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine, are already clinically approved. A third hepatobiliary contrast agent, Gd-EOB-DTPA, is under consideration. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview on the properties, clinical development and application of these three hepatobiliary contrast agents. Bolus injectable paramagnetic hepatobiliary contrast agents combine established features of extracellular agents with the advantages of hepatocyte specificity. The detection and characterisation of focal liver disease appears to be improved compared to unenhanced MRI, MRI with unspecific contrast agents and contrast-enhanced CT. To decrease the total time spent by a patient in the MR scanner, it is advisable to administer the agent immediately after acquisition of unenhanced T1-w MRI. After infusion or bolus injection (with dynamic FS-T1-w 2D or 3D GRE) of the contrast agent, moderately and heavily T2w images are acquired. Post-contrast T1-w MRI is started upon completion of T2-w MRI for mangafodipir trisodium and Gd-EOB-DTPA as early as 20 min following injection, while gadobenate dimeglumine scans are obtained >60 min following injection. Post-contrast acquisition techniques with near isotropic 3D pulse sequences with fat saturation parallel the technical progress made by MSCT combined with an unparalleled improvement in tumour-liver contrast. The individual decision that hepatobiliary contrast agent one uses is partly based on personal preferences. No comparative studies have been conducted comparing the advantages or disadvantages of all three agents directly against each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14986050     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2236-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  79 in total

1.  Hepatic transport of gadobenate dimeglumine in TR-rats.

Authors:  C de Haën; V Lorusso; P Tirone
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Multihance clinical pharmacology: biodistribution and MR enhancement of the liver.

Authors:  A Spinazzi; V Lorusso; G Pirovano; P Taroni; M Kirchin; A Davies
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Efficacy and safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. Multicenter phase III clinical trials. Efficacy of early imaging.

Authors:  M Federle; J Chezmar; D L Rubin; J Weinreb; P Freeny; U P Schmiedl; J J Brown; J A Borrello; J K Lee; R C Semelka; R Mattrey; A H Dachman; S Saini; S E Harms; D G Mitchell; M W Anderson; H H Halford; W F Bennett; S W Young; M Rifkin; S B Gay; R Ballerini; P F Sherwin; R O Robison
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  W Stern; F Schick; A F Kopp; P Reimer; K Shamsi; C D Claussen; M Laniado
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance imaging of liver tumors.

Authors:  R Kuwatsuru; M Kadoya; K Ohtomo; A Tanimoto; S Hirohashi; T Murakami; Y Tanaka; K Yoshikawa; H Katayama
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Hepatic MRI with SPIO: detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  P Reimer; B Tombach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Hepatocellular tumors: characterization with Mn-DPDP-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  N M Rofsky; J C Weinreb; M E Bernardino; S W Young; J K Lee; M E Noz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison between Gd-DTPA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Mn-DPDP in induced HCC in rats: a correlation study of MR imaging, microangiography, and histology.

Authors:  G Marchal; X Zhang; Y Ni; P Van Hecke; J Yu; A L Baert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA, a new liver-directed magnetic resonance contrast agent. Absence of acute hepatotoxic, cardiovascular, or immunogenic effects.

Authors:  A Mühler; O Clément; M Saeed; J R Lake; D P Stites; Y Berthezène; R C Brasch
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  MR imaging evaluation of liver enhancement by Gd-EOB-DTPA in selective and total bile duct obstruction in rats: correlation with serologic, microcholangiographic, and histologic findings.

Authors:  Y Ni; G Marchal; G Lukito; J Yu; A Mühler; A L Baert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  72 in total

1.  Manganese chloride tetrahydrate (CMC-001) enhanced liver MRI: evaluation of efficacy and safety in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Nils Albiin; Nikolaos Kartalis; Annika Bergquist; Bita Sadigh; Torkel B Brismar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree.

Authors:  T Hyodo; S Kumano; F Kushihata; M Okada; M Hirata; T Tsuda; Y Takada; T Mochizuki; T Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The effect of gadoxetic acid enhancement on lesion detection and characterisation using T₂ weighted imaging and diffusion weighted imaging of the liver.

Authors:  S A Choi; S S Lee; I-H Jung; H A Kim; J H Byun; M-G Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging: Review of imaging techniques and overview of liver imaging.

Authors:  Santhi Maniam; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-28

Review 5.  Safety of MR liver specific contrast media.

Authors:  Marie-France Bellin; Judith A W Webb; Aart J Van Der Molen; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Thioguanin-induced nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver-ROC analysis of different MR techniques.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Julia Seiderer; Walter Reinisch; Thomas Ochsenkuhn; Wolfgang Schima; Joachim Diebold; Fritz Wrba; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Can microvessel invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma be predicted by pre-operative MRI?

Authors:  Honsoul Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Jin Young Choi; Young Nyun Park; Myeong-Jin Kim; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Kwang-Hyub Han; EunJu Kim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement in vitro and in vivo by octanuclear iron-oxo cluster-based agents.

Authors:  Soma Das; Kenia Parga; Indranil Chakraborty; Arthur D Tinoco; Yamixa Delgado; Paola M López; Lauren Fernández Vega; Yiannis Sanakis; Sukhen Ghosh; Jim Bankson; Jim Klostergaard; Ricardo González-Méndez; Raphael G Raptis
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.155

Review 9.  Clinical value of MRI liver-specific contrast agents: a tailored examination for a confident non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Martin Uffmann; Sanjai Saini; Nina Bastati; Christian Herold; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.