Literature DB >> 25514004

Distance-dependent defensive coloration.

James B Barnett1, Innes C Cuthill2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25514004     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Imperfect camouflage: how to hide in a variable world?

Authors:  Anna Hughes; Eric Liggins; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cultural evolution of military camouflage.

Authors:  Laszlo Talas; Roland J Baddeley; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The perfection of mimicry: an information approach.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt; Casey A Peet-Paré
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Distance-dependent pattern blending can camouflage salient aposematic signals.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Divergence, gene flow, and the origin of leapfrog geographic distributions: The history of colour pattern variation in Phyllobates poison-dart frogs.

Authors:  Roberto Márquez; Tyler P Linderoth; Daniel Mejía-Vargas; Rasmus Nielsen; Adolfo Amézquita; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration in the poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius, Dendrobatidae.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; John Skelhorn; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Optimal background matching camouflage.

Authors:  Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; David P Gibson; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Distance-dependent aposematism and camouflage in the cinnabar moth caterpillar (Tyria jacobaeae, Erebidae).

Authors:  James B Barnett; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.