Literature DB >> 27484645

Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.

James B Barnett1, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel2, Innes C Cuthill3.   

Abstract

Aposematic signals are often characterized by high conspicuousness. Larger and brighter signals reinforce avoidance learning, distinguish defended from palatable prey and are more easily memorized by predators. Conspicuous signalling, however, has costs: encounter rates with naive, specialized or nutritionally stressed predators are likely to increase. It has been suggested that intermediate levels of aposematic conspicuousness can evolve to balance deterrence and detectability, especially for moderately defended species. The effectiveness of such signals, however, has not yet been experimentally tested under field conditions. We used dough caterpillar-like baits to test whether reduced levels of aposematic conspicuousness can have survival benefits when predated by wild birds in natural conditions. Our results suggest that, when controlling for the number and intensity of internal contrast boundaries (stripes), a reduced-conspicuousness aposematic pattern can have a survival advantage over more conspicuous signals, as well as cryptic colours. Furthermore, we find a survival benefit from the addition of internal contrast for both high and low levels of conspicuousness. This adds ecological validity to evolutionary models of aposematic saliency and the evolution of honest signalling.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Keywords:  aposematism; camouflage; defensive coloration; honest signalling; visual signalling; warning signals

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27484645      PMCID: PMC5014027          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  13 in total

1.  Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva.

Authors:  Birgitta S Tullberg; Sami Merilaita; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 6.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  How bright and how nasty: explaining diversity in warning signal strength.

Authors:  Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Can't tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Innes C Cuthill; Ian F Harvey; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cultural evolution of military camouflage.

Authors:  Laszlo Talas; Roland J Baddeley; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Distance-dependent pattern blending can camouflage salient aposematic signals.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Biased generalization of salient traits drives the evolution of warning signals.

Authors:  Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Baharan Kazemi; Alexandra Balogh; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Hannah M Anderson; Brendan L McEwen; Justin Yeager; Jonathan N Pruitt; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Background complexity can mitigate poor camouflage.

Authors:  Zeke W Rowe; Daniel J D Austin; Nicol Chippington; William Flynn; Finn Starkey; Edward J Wightman; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration in the poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius, Dendrobatidae.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Optimal background matching camouflage.

Authors:  Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; David P Gibson; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Distance-dependent aposematism and camouflage in the cinnabar moth caterpillar (Tyria jacobaeae, Erebidae).

Authors:  James B Barnett; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Sex differences but no evidence of quantitative honesty in the warning signals of six-spot burnet moths (Zygaena filipendulae L.).

Authors:  Emmanuelle Sophie Briolat; Mika Zagrobelny; Carl Erik Olsen; Jonathan D Blount; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.