Literature DB >> 31088268

Imperfect camouflage: how to hide in a variable world?

Anna Hughes1, Eric Liggins2, Martin Stevens1.   

Abstract

Camouflage is an important anti-predator strategy for many animals and is traditionally thought of as being tightly linked to a specific visual background. While much work focuses on optimizing camouflage against one background, this may not be relevant for many species and contexts, as animals may encounter many different habitats throughout their lives due to temporal and spatial variation in their environment. How should camouflage be optimized when an animal or object is seen against multiple visual backgrounds? Various solutions may exist, including colour change to match new environments or use of behaviour to maintain crypsis by choosing appropriate substrates. Here, we focus on a selection of approaches under a third alternative strategy: animals may adopt (over evolution) camouflage appearances that represent an optimal solution against multiple visual scenes. One approach may include a generalist or compromise strategy, where coloration matches several backgrounds to some extent, but none closely. A range of other camouflage types, including disruptive camouflage, may also provide protection in multiple environments. Despite detailed theoretical work determining the plausibility of compromise camouflage and elucidating the conditions under which it might evolve, there is currently mixed experimental evidence supporting its value and little evidence of it in natural systems. In addition, there remain many questions including how camouflage strategies should be defined and optimized, and how they might interact with other types of crypsis and defensive markings. Overall, we provide a critical overview of our current knowledge about how camouflage can enable matching to multiple backgrounds, discuss important challenges of working on this question and make recommendations for future research.

Keywords:  anti-predator coloration; camouflage; disruption; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31088268      PMCID: PMC6532520          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  44 in total

Review 1.  Animal colour vision--behavioural tests and physiological concepts.

Authors:  Almut Kelber; Misha Vorobyev; Daniel Osorio
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2003-02

2.  Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Nina Stobbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Natural selection on social signals: signal efficacy and the evolution of chameleon display coloration.

Authors:  Devi Stuart-Fox; Adnan Moussalli; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Johan Lind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The biology of color.

Authors:  Innes C Cuthill; William L Allen; Kevin Arbuckle; Barbara Caspers; George Chaplin; Mark E Hauber; Geoffrey E Hill; Nina G Jablonski; Chris D Jiggins; Almut Kelber; Johanna Mappes; Justin Marshall; Richard Merrill; Daniel Osorio; Richard Prum; Nicholas W Roberts; Alexandre Roulin; Hannah M Rowland; Thomas N Sherratt; John Skelhorn; Michael P Speed; Martin Stevens; Mary Caswell Stoddard; Devi Stuart-Fox; Laszlo Talas; Elizabeth Tibbetts; Tim Caro
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Optimal background matching camouflage.

Authors:  Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; David P Gibson; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Relative advantages of dichromatic and trichromatic color vision in camouflage breaking.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Jared Wilson-Aggarwal; David Griffiths; Claire N Spottiswoode; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Detection experiments with humans implicate visual predation as a driver of colour polymorphism dynamics in pygmy grasshoppers.

Authors:  Einat Karpestam; Sami Merilaita; Anders Forsman
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Camouflage predicts survival in ground-nesting birds.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Jared Wilson-Aggarwal; Martin Stevens; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Background complexity can mitigate poor camouflage.

Authors:  Zeke W Rowe; Daniel J D Austin; Nicol Chippington; William Flynn; Finn Starkey; Edward J Wightman; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?

Authors:  James A M Galloway; Samuel D Green; Martin Stevens; Laura A Kelley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Gray plumage color is more cryptic than brown in snowy landscapes in a resident color polymorphic bird.

Authors:  Katja Koskenpato; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Carita Lindstedt; Patrik Karell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Motion: enhancing signals and concealing cues.

Authors:  Eunice J Tan; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.422

5.  Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Sophie Briolat; Lina María Arenas; Anna E Hughes; Eric Liggins; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.