Literature DB >> 28533457

The perfection of mimicry: an information approach.

Thomas N Sherratt1, Casey A Peet-Paré2.   

Abstract

We consider why imperfect deceptive mimics can persist when it appears to be in the predator's interest to discriminate finely between mimics and their models. One theory is that a receiver will accept being duped if the model and mimic overlap in appearance and the relative costs of attacking the model are high. However, a more fundamental explanation for the difficulty of discrimination is not based on perceptual uncertainty, but simply based on a lack of information. In particular, predators in the process of learning may cease sampling imperfect mimics entirely because the immediate pay-off and future value of information is low, allowing such mimics to persist. This outcome will be particularly likely when the model is relatively costly to attack and/or the discriminative rules the predator has to learn are complex. Information limitations neatly explain why predators tend to adopt discriminative rules based on single traits (such as stripe colour), rather than on combinations of traits (such as stripe order). They also explain why predators utilize certain salient discriminative traits while ignoring equally informative ones (a phenomenon known as overshadowing), and why imperfect mimics may be more common in phenotypically diverse prey communities.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Batesian mimicry; bandit model; learning; model selection; overshadowing; signal reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28533457      PMCID: PMC5444061          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  30 in total

1.  The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries.

Authors:  Leena Lindström; Rauno V Alatalo; Anne Lyytinen; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The evolution of müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities.

Authors:  Christopher D Beatty; Kirsten Beirinckx; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The evolution of mimicry under constraints.

Authors:  Øistein Haugsten Holen; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Feature saltation and the evolution of mimicry.

Authors:  Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Alexandra C V Balogh; Birgitta S Tullberg; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Mimicry on the edge: why do mimics vary in resemblance to their model in different parts of their geographical range?

Authors:  George R Harper; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  C J Duncan; P M Sheppard
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1965       Impact factor: 1.991

7.  Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.

Authors:  Eira Ihalainen; Hannah M Rowland; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration.

Authors:  Jonathan D Cohen; Samuel M McClure; Angela J Yu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Stimulus salience as an explanation for imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Baharan Kazemi; Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Birgitta S Tullberg; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Daniel Osorio
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sensory bias and signal detection trade-offs maintain intersexual floral mimicry.

Authors:  Avery L Russell; David W Kikuchi; Noah W Giebink; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Unsupervised machine learning reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees occur along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Briana D Ezray; Drew C Wham; Carrie E Hill; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  How cognitive biases select for imperfect mimicry: a study of asymmetry in learning with bumblebees.

Authors:  David W Kikuchi; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Frequency dependence shapes the adaptive landscape of imperfect Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  Susan D Finkbeiner; Patricio A Salazar; Sofía Nogales; Cassidi E Rush; Adriana D Briscoe; Ryan I Hill; Marcus R Kronforst; Keith R Willmott; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Persistence of multiple patterns and intraspecific polymorphism in multi-species Müllerian communities of net-winged beetles.

Authors:  Matej Bocek; Dominik Kusy; Michal Motyka; Ladislav Bocak
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Field evidence for colour mimicry overshadowing morphological mimicry.

Authors:  Alberto Corral-Lopez; Javier Edo Varg; Yiselle P Cano-Cobos; Rafael Losada; Emilio Realpe; David Outomuro
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Mimicry in motion and morphology: do information limitation, trade-offs or compensation relax selection for mimetic accuracy?

Authors:  Donald James McLean; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development.

Authors:  Steven M Van Belleghem; Paola A Alicea Roman; Heriberto Carbia Gutierrez; Brian A Counterman; Riccardo Papa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.