Literature DB >> 29866847

Distance-dependent defensive coloration in the poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius, Dendrobatidae.

James B Barnett1, Constantine Michalis2, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel3, Innes C Cuthill1.   

Abstract

Poison dart frogs provide classic examples of warning signals: potent toxins signaled by distinctive, conspicuous coloration. We show that, counterintuitively, the bright yellow and blue-black color of Dendrobates tinctorius (Dendrobatidae) also provides camouflage. Through computational modeling of predator vision, and a screen-based detection experiment presenting frogs at different spatial resolutions, we demonstrate that at close range the frog is highly detectable, but from a distance the colors blend together, forming effective camouflage. This result was corroborated with an in situ experiment, which found survival to be background-dependent, a feature more associated with camouflage than aposematism. Our results suggest that in D. tinctorius the distribution of pattern elements, and the particular colors expressed, act as a highly salient close range aposematic signal, while simultaneously minimizing detectability to distant observers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dendrobatidae; acuity; aposematism; camouflage; distance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29866847      PMCID: PMC6016827          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800826115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spots and stripes: the evolution of repetition in visual signal form.

Authors:  Benjamin Kenward; Carl-Adam Wachtmeister; Stefano Ghirlanda; Magnus Enquist
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva.

Authors:  Birgitta S Tullberg; Sami Merilaita; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Geographic and seasonal variation in alkaloid-based chemical defenses of Dendrobates pumilio from Bocas del Toro, Panama.

Authors:  Ralph A Saporito; Maureen A Donnelly; H Martin Garraffo; Thomas F Spande; John W Daly
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.

Authors:  John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; Amy M M Windsor; Hannah J Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in the european starling (Sturnus vulgaris)

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Warning coloration can be disruptive: aposematic marginal wing patterning in the wood tiger moth.

Authors:  Atsushi Honma; Johanna Mappes; Janne K Valkonen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  8 in total

1.  Why has transparency evolved in aposematic butterflies? Insights from the largest radiation of aposematic butterflies, the Ithomiini.

Authors:  Melanie McClure; Corentin Clerc; Charlotte Desbois; Aimilia Meichanetzoglou; Marion Cau; Lucie Bastin-Héline; Javier Bacigalupo; Céline Houssin; Charline Pinna; Bastien Nay; Violaine Llaurens; Serge Berthier; Christine Andraud; Doris Gomez; Marianne Elias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Hannah M Anderson; Brendan L McEwen; Justin Yeager; Jonathan N Pruitt; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mimicry can drive convergence in structural and light transmission features of transparent wings in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Doris Gomez; Marianne Elias; Charline Sophie Pinna; Maëlle Vilbert; Stephan Borensztajn; Willy Daney de Marcillac; Florence Piron-Prunier; Aaron Pomerantz; Nipam H Patel; Serge Berthier; Christine Andraud
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Divergence, gene flow, and the origin of leapfrog geographic distributions: The history of colour pattern variation in Phyllobates poison-dart frogs.

Authors:  Roberto Márquez; Tyler P Linderoth; Daniel Mejía-Vargas; Rasmus Nielsen; Adolfo Amézquita; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  How conspicuous are peacock eyespots and other colorful feathers in the eyes of mammalian predators?

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Yuchao Wang; Rui Fang; Yabin Lu; Roslyn Dakin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Discrete or indiscrete? Redefining the colour polymorphism of the land snail Cepaea nemoralis.

Authors:  Angus Davison; Hannah J Jackson; Ellis W Murphy; Tom Reader
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  From habitat use to social behavior: natural history of a voiceless poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius.

Authors:  Bibiana Rojas; Andrius Pašukonis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  What's in a band? The function of the color and banding pattern of the Banded Swallowtail.

Authors:  Eunice J Tan; Bodo D Wilts; Brent T K Tan; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.