Literature DB >> 25512146

A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews.

Yong Chen1, Yulun Liu1, Jing Ning2, Lei Nie3, Hongjian Zhu1, Haitao Chu4.   

Abstract

Diagnostic systematic review is a vital step in the evaluation of diagnostic technologies. In many applications, it involves pooling pairs of sensitivity and specificity of a dichotomized diagnostic test from multiple studies. We propose a composite likelihood (CL) method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews. This method provides an alternative way to make inference on diagnostic measures such as sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio. Its main advantages over the standard likelihood method are the avoidance of the nonconvergence problem, which is nontrivial when the number of studies is relatively small, the computational simplicity, and some robustness to model misspecifications. Simulation studies show that the CL method maintains high relative efficiency compared to that of the standard likelihood method. We illustrate our method in a diagnostic review of the performance of contemporary diagnostic imaging technologies for detecting metastases in patients with melanoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bivariate generalized linear mixed effects model; composite likelihood; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic review; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25512146      PMCID: PMC4466215          DOI: 10.1177/0962280214562146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  28 in total

1.  Bayesian analysis on meta-analysis of case-control studies accounting for within-study correlation.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Haitao Chu; Sheng Luo; Lei Nie; Sining Chen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J A Knottnerus; J W Muris
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Regression methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test data.

Authors:  C M Rutter; C A Gatsonis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method.

Authors:  B Littenberg; L E Moses
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.

Authors:  L E Moses; D Shapiro; B Littenberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Early detection and treatment of skin cancer.

Authors:  A F Jerant; J T Johnson; C D Sheridan; T J Caffrey
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  An Empirical Bayes Method for Multivariate Meta-analysis with an Application in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Sheng Luo; Haitao Chu; Xiao Su; Lei Nie
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 0.893

View more
  4 in total

1.  Meta-Analysis Methods of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Niki Dimou; Pantelis Bagos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Annamaria Guolo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data.

Authors:  Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Richard D Riley; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Maximum likelihood estimation based on Newton-Raphson iteration for the bivariate random effects model in test accuracy meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Mohammed Baragilly; Dyuti Coomar
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.