Literature DB >> 31184270

Maximum likelihood estimation based on Newton-Raphson iteration for the bivariate random effects model in test accuracy meta-analysis.

Brian H Willis1, Mohammed Baragilly1,2, Dyuti Coomar1.   

Abstract

A bivariate generalised linear mixed model is often used for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. The model is complex and requires five parameters to be estimated. As there is no closed form for the likelihood function for the model, maximum likelihood estimates for the parameters have to be obtained numerically. Although generic functions have emerged which may estimate the parameters in these models, they remain opaque to many. From first principles we demonstrate how the maximum likelihood estimates for the parameters may be obtained using two methods based on Newton-Raphson iteration. The first uses the profile likelihood and the second uses the Observed Fisher Information. As convergence may depend on the proximity of the initial estimates to the global maximum, each algorithm includes a method for obtaining robust initial estimates. A simulation study was used to evaluate the algorithms and compare their performance with the generic generalised linear mixed model function glmer from the lme4 package in R before applying them to two meta-analyses from the literature. In general, the two algorithms had higher convergence rates and coverage probabilities than glmer. Based on its performance characteristics the method of profiling is recommended for fitting the bivariate generalised linear mixed model for meta-analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bivariate model; diagnostic accuracy; maximum likelihood estimation; meta-analysis; random effects

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31184270      PMCID: PMC7221455          DOI: 10.1177/0962280219853602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  20 in total

Review 1.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Anne W S Rutjes; Rob J P M Scholten; Patrick M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Jonathan J Deeks; Matthias Egger; Penny Whiting; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Maximum likelihood, profile likelihood, and penalized likelihood: a primer.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  A bivariate approach to meta-analysis.

Authors:  H C Van Houwelingen; K H Zwinderman; T Stijnen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Effect of intravenous streptokinase on acute myocardial infarction: pooled results from randomized trials.

Authors:  M J Stampfer; S Z Goldhaber; S Yusuf; R Peto; C H Hennekens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Lau; E M Antman; J Jimenez-Silva; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  What is the test's accuracy in my practice population? Tailored meta-analysis provides a plausible estimate.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Christopher J Hyde
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Measuring the statistical validity of summary meta-analysis and meta-regression results for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Tailored meta-analysis: an investigation of the correlation between the test positive rate and prevalence.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Dyuti Coomar; Mohammed Baragilly
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  1 in total

1.  On estimating a constrained bivariate random effects model for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Mohammed Baragilly; Brian Harvey Willis
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.021

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.