Mark C Svendsen1,2, Anjan K Sinha3, Zachary C Berwick1,2, William Combs1, Shawn D Teague4, Thierry Lefevre5, Vasilis Babaliaros6, Ghassan Kassab1,7,8. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana. 2. 3DT Holdings LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana. 3. Department of Cardiology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana. 4. Indiana School of Medicine, Indiana Institute for Biomedical Imaging Sciences, Indianapolis, Indiana. 5. Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Moassy, France. 6. Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 7. Department of Surgery, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana. 8. Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inaccurate aortic valve sizing and selection is linked to paravalvular leakage in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Here, a novel sizing valvuloplasty conductance balloon (SVCB) catheter is shown to be accurate, reproducible, unbiased, and provides real-time tool for aortic valve sizing that fits within the standard valvuloplasty procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SVCB catheter is a valvuloplasty device that uses real-time electrical conductance measurements based on Ohm's Law to size the balloon opposed against the aortic valve at any given inflation pressure. Accuracy and repeatability of the SVCB catheter was performed on the bench in phantoms of known dimension and ex vivo in three domestic swine aortic annuli with comparison to computed tomography (CT) and dilator measurements. Procedural workflow and safety was demonstrated in vivo in three additional domestic swine. SVCB catheter measurements had negligible bias or error for bench accuracy considered as the gold standard (Bias: -0.11 ± 0.26 mm; Error: 1.2%), but greater disagreement in ex vivo versus dilators (Bias: -0.3 ± 1.1 mm; Error: 4.5%), and ex vivo versus CT (Bias: -1.0 ± 1.6 mm; Error: 8.7%). The dilator versus CT accuracy showed similar agreement (Bias: -0.9 ± 1.5 mm; Error: 7.3%). Repeatability was excellent on the bench (Bias: 0.02 ± 0.12 mm; Error: 0.5%) and ex vivo (Bias: -0.4 ± 0.9 mm; Error: 4.6%). In animal studies, the device fit well within the procedural workflow with no adverse events or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the clinical relevance of this accurate, repeatable, unbiased, and real-time sizing measurement, the SVCB catheter may provide a useful tool prior to TAVR. These findings merit a future human study.
BACKGROUND: Inaccurate aortic valve sizing and selection is linked to paravalvular leakage in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Here, a novel sizing valvuloplasty conductance balloon (SVCB) catheter is shown to be accurate, reproducible, unbiased, and provides real-time tool for aortic valve sizing that fits within the standard valvuloplasty procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SVCB catheter is a valvuloplasty device that uses real-time electrical conductance measurements based on Ohm's Law to size the balloon opposed against the aortic valve at any given inflation pressure. Accuracy and repeatability of the SVCB catheter was performed on the bench in phantoms of known dimension and ex vivo in three domestic swine aortic annuli with comparison to computed tomography (CT) and dilator measurements. Procedural workflow and safety was demonstrated in vivo in three additional domestic swine. SVCB catheter measurements had negligible bias or error for bench accuracy considered as the gold standard (Bias: -0.11 ± 0.26 mm; Error: 1.2%), but greater disagreement in ex vivo versus dilators (Bias: -0.3 ± 1.1 mm; Error: 4.5%), and ex vivo versus CT (Bias: -1.0 ± 1.6 mm; Error: 8.7%). The dilator versus CT accuracy showed similar agreement (Bias: -0.9 ± 1.5 mm; Error: 7.3%). Repeatability was excellent on the bench (Bias: 0.02 ± 0.12 mm; Error: 0.5%) and ex vivo (Bias: -0.4 ± 0.9 mm; Error: 4.6%). In animal studies, the device fit well within the procedural workflow with no adverse events or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the clinical relevance of this accurate, repeatable, unbiased, and real-time sizing measurement, the SVCB catheter may provide a useful tool prior to TAVR. These findings merit a future human study.
Authors: John G Webb; Mann Chandavimol; Christopher R Thompson; Donald R Ricci; Ronald G Carere; Brad I Munt; Christopher E Buller; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Samuel Lichtenstein Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ghassan S Kassab; Jenny S Choy; Mark Svendsen; Anjan K Sinha; Mouhamad Alloosh; Mike Sturek; Yunlong Huo; George E Sandusky; James Hermiller Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Carl J Schultz; Adriaan Moelker; Nicolo Piazza; Apostolos Tzikas; Amber Otten; Rutger J Nuis; Lisan A Neefjes; Robert J van Geuns; Pim de Feyter; Gabriel Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P T de Jaegere Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Corrado Tamburino; Davide Capodanno; Angelo Ramondo; Anna Sonia Petronio; Federica Ettori; Gennaro Santoro; Silvio Klugmann; Francesco Bedogni; Francesco Maisano; Antonio Marzocchi; Arnaldo Poli; David Antoniucci; Massimo Napodano; Marco De Carlo; Claudia Fiorina; Gian Paolo Ussia Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jose de Ribamar Costa; Gary S Mintz; Stéphane G Carlier; Ricardo A Costa; Kenichi Fujii; Koichi Sano; Masashi Kimura; Joanna Lui; Giora Weisz; Issam Moussa; George Dangas; Roxana Mehran; Alexandra J Lansky; Edward M Kreps; Michael Collins; Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Vasilis C Babaliaros; Zahid Junagadhwalla; Stamatios Lerakis; Vinod Thourani; David Liff; Edward Chen; Thomas Vassiliades; Clay Chappell; Nathan Gross; Ateet Patel; Sharon Howell; Jacob T Green; Emir Veledar; Robert Guyton; Peter C Block Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Vasilis C Babaliaros; David Liff; Edward P Chen; Jason H Rogers; Ryan A Brown; Vinod H Thourani; Robert A Guyton; Stamatios Lerakis; Arthur E Stillman; Paolo Raggi; Jennifer E Cheesborough; Emir Veledar; Emir Veladar; Jacob T Green; Peter C Block Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Hyo Won Choi; Zachary C Berwick; Matthew S Sulkin; Christopher D Owens; Ghassan S Kassab Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.240