OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the potential role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in sizing the aortic annulus in patients before transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation. BACKGROUND: Despite clinicians' growing experience with THV procedures, the best method of annulus sizing remains unclear. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with aortic stenosis (<1.0 cm(2)) who were undergoing surgical valve replacement were enrolled. Pre-operative echocardiographic measurements of the annulus and computed tomography measurements of valve calcium were made. Intraoperatively, a valvuloplasty balloon of known size and inflatable pressure was inserted into the aortic valve and inflated. The development of intraballoon pressure in addition to the nominal inflation pressure (AIBP) reflected the apposition of balloon and valve. Surgical annulus was measured by cylindrical sizers. RESULTS: In patients with tricuspid valves, AIBP was generated in 11 of 12 patients when the balloon diameter was greater than the surgically measured annulus, regardless of leaflet calcification (2 of 10 patients when balloon < or = surgical annulus). In bicuspid valves, high AIBP ( approximately 1 atm) was encountered with balloons that were within 1 mm of annulus size, and leaflet dehiscence occurred with larger balloons (n = 2 patients). Annulus size was underestimated by transthoracic echocardiogram and transesophageal echocardiogram compared with surgery (p < 0.001): transthoracic echocardiogram = 21.5 +/- 1.8 mm, transesophageal echocardiogram = 22.0 +/- 1.6 mm and surgical = 23.2 +/- 1.9 mm (range 20 to 27 mm, mode 22 mm). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that measuring AIBP during balloon aortic valvuloplasty in tricuspid valves is an important adjunctive measurement of the aortic annulus and may help in determining the appropriate THV size.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the potential role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in sizing the aortic annulus in patients before transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation. BACKGROUND: Despite clinicians' growing experience with THV procedures, the best method of annulus sizing remains unclear. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with aortic stenosis (<1.0 cm(2)) who were undergoing surgical valve replacement were enrolled. Pre-operative echocardiographic measurements of the annulus and computed tomography measurements of valve calcium were made. Intraoperatively, a valvuloplasty balloon of known size and inflatable pressure was inserted into the aortic valve and inflated. The development of intraballoon pressure in addition to the nominal inflation pressure (AIBP) reflected the apposition of balloon and valve. Surgical annulus was measured by cylindrical sizers. RESULTS: In patients with tricuspid valves, AIBP was generated in 11 of 12 patients when the balloon diameter was greater than the surgically measured annulus, regardless of leaflet calcification (2 of 10 patients when balloon < or = surgical annulus). In bicuspid valves, high AIBP ( approximately 1 atm) was encountered with balloons that were within 1 mm of annulus size, and leaflet dehiscence occurred with larger balloons (n = 2 patients). Annulus size was underestimated by transthoracic echocardiogram and transesophageal echocardiogram compared with surgery (p < 0.001): transthoracic echocardiogram = 21.5 +/- 1.8 mm, transesophageal echocardiogram = 22.0 +/- 1.6 mm and surgical = 23.2 +/- 1.9 mm (range 20 to 27 mm, mode 22 mm). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that measuring AIBP during balloon aortic valvuloplasty in tricuspid valves is an important adjunctive measurement of the aortic annulus and may help in determining the appropriate THV size.
Authors: Antonio H Frangieh; Jonathan Michel; Oliver Deutsch; Michael Joner; Costanza Pellegrini; Tobias Rheude; Sabine Bleiziffer; Albert Markus Kasel Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mark C Svendsen; Anjan K Sinha; Zachary C Berwick; William Combs; Shawn D Teague; Thierry Lefevre; Vasilis Babaliaros; Ghassan Kassab Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rebecca T Hahn; Susheel Kodali; E Murat Tuzcu; Martin B Leon; Samir Kapadia; Deepika Gopal; Stamatios Lerakis; Brian R Lindman; Zuyue Wang; John Webb; Vinod H Thourani; Pamela S Douglas Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-03
Authors: Polykarpos C Patsalis; Axel Kloppe; Björn Plicht; Dominik Schöne; Fabian Schiedat; Assem Aweimer; Kaffer Kara; Peter Lukas Haldenwang; Justus Thomas Strauch; Thomas Buck; Andreas Mügge Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2020-07-30
Authors: Johnny Chahine; Zeina Jedeon; Jacob Fiocchi; Andrew Shaffer; Ryan Knoper; Ranjit John; Demetris Yannopoulos; Ganesh Raveendran; Sergey Gurevich Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-22
Authors: Ibrahim Akin; Stephan Kische; Tim C Rehders; Christoph A Nienaber; Mathias Rauchhaus; Hüseyin Ince; Henrik Schneider; Andreas Liebold Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Florian Schwarz; Philipp Lange; Dominik Zinsser; Martin Greif; Peter Boekstegers; Christoph Schmitz; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Kupatt; Hans C Becker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240