Literature DB >> 25498570

External validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict biochemical recurrence, metastasis and mortality after radical prostatectomy in a European cohort.

Derya Tilki1, Philipp Mandel2, Thorsten Schlomm3, Felix K-H Chun2, Pierre Tennstedt4, Dirk Pehrke4, Alexander Haese4, Hartwig Huland4, Markus Graefen4, Georg Salomon4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The CAPRA-S score predicts prostate cancer recurrence based on pathological information from radical prostatectomy. To our knowledge CAPRA-S has never been externally validated in a European cohort. We independently validated CAPRA-S in a single institution European database.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised 14,532 patients treated with radical prostatectomy between January 1992 and August 2012. Prediction of biochemical recurrence, metastasis and cancer specific mortality by CAPRA-S was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the c-index. CAPRA-S performance to predict biochemical recurrence was evaluated by calibration plot and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Median followup was 50.8 months (IQR 25.0-96.0). Biochemical recurrence developed in 20.3% of men at a median of 21.2 months (IQR 7.7-44.9). When stratifying patients by CAPRA-S risk group, estimated 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 91.4%, 70.4% and 29.3% in the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively. The CAPRA-S c-index to predict biochemical recurrence, metastasis and cancer specific mortality was 0.80, 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. Metastasis developed in 417 men and 196 men died of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The CAPRA-S score was accurate when applied in a European study cohort. It predicted biochemical recurrence, metastasis and cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy with a c-index of greater than 0.80. The score can be valuable in regard to decision making for adjuvant therapy.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forecasting; local; neoplasm recurrence; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498570     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes in transplant patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Burkhard Beyer; Philipp Mandel; Uwe Michl; Raisa S Pompe; Valia Veleva; Thomas Steuber; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  P Mandel; D Tilki; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Complete bladder neck preservation promotes long-term post-prostatectomy continence without compromising midterm oncological outcome: analysis of a randomised controlled cohort.

Authors:  Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Diana Tichy; Gencay Hatiboglu; Sascha Pahernik; Georgi Tosev; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect patient pathological outcome? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Cedric Lebacle; Thierry Lebeau; Serge Benayoun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  18F Fluorocholine Dynamic Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinical-Pathologic Comparisons.

Authors:  Joon Young Choi; Jaewon Yang; Susan M Noworolski; Spencer Behr; Albert J Chang; Jeffry P Simko; Hao G Nguyen; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  CAPRA-S predicts outcome for adjuvant and salvage external beam radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michel Zimmermann; Guila Delouya; Abdullah M Alenizi; Emad Rajih; Kevin C Zorn; Daniel Taussky
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system among prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-08

8.  Chromatin changes predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tarjei S Hveem; Andreas Kleppe; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Elin Ersvær; Håkon Wæhre; Birgitte Nielsen; Marte Avranden Kjær; Manohar Pradhan; Rolf Anders Syvertsen; John Arne Nesheim; Knut Liestøl; Fritz Albregtsen; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Optimising preoperative risk stratification tools for prostate cancer using mpMRI.

Authors:  Lars A R Reisæter; Jurgen J Fütterer; Are Losnegård; Yngve Nygård; Jan Monssen; Karsten Gravdal; Ole J Halvorsen; Lars A Akslen; Martin Biermann; Svein Haukaas; Jarle Rørvik; Christian Beisland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Combining 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-Directed and Elective Radiation Therapy Improves Outcome in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simon Kirste; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Christoph Henkenberens; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Marco M E Vogel; Jessica Becker; Constantinos Zamboglou; Irene Burger; Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bartenstein; Juri Ruf; Christian la Fougère; Matthias Eiber; Hans Christiansen; Stephanie E Combs; Arndt-Christian Müller; Claus Belka; Matthias Guckenberger; Anca-Ligia Grosu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.