Literature DB >> 27217861

CAPRA-S predicts outcome for adjuvant and salvage external beam radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

Michel Zimmermann1, Guila Delouya2, Abdullah M Alenizi3, Emad Rajih3, Kevin C Zorn3, Daniel Taussky2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical Score (CAPRA-S) for patients treated with radical prostatectomy followed by subsequent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
METHODS: A total of 373 patients treated with EBRT between January 2000 and June 2015 were identified in the institutional database. Followup and complete CAPRA-S score were available for 334 (89.5%) patients. CAPRA-S scores were sorted into previously defined categories of low- (score 0-2), intermediate- (3-5), and high-risk (6-12). Time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.20 ng/mL after EBRT. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Overall median time from surgery to EBRT was 18 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8-36) and median followup since EBRT was 48 months (IQR 28-78). CAPRA-S predicted time to BCR (<0.001), time to palliative androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) (p=0.017), and a trend for significantly predicting overall survival (OS, p=0.058). On multivariate analysis, the CAPRA-S was predictive of time to BCR only (low-risk vs. intermediate-risk; hazard ratio [HR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.043-0.48, p=0.001). The last PSA measurement before EBRT as a continuous and grouped variable proved highly significant in predicting all outcomes tested, including OS (p≤0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: CAPRA-S predicts time to BCR and freedom from palliative ADT, and is borderline significant for OS. Together with the PSA before EBRT, CAPRA-S is a useful, predictive tool. The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27217861      PMCID: PMC4839995          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  14 in total

Review 1.  Can early implementation of salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer improve the therapeutic ratio? A systematic review and regression meta-analysis with radiobiological modelling.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Adam P Dicker; Edouard J Trabulsi; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Joan F Hilton; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Long-term Outcome of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Exhibit Biochemical Failure Despite Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  James Ying; Chiachien J Wang; Jingsheng Yan; Stanley L Liauw; Christopher Straka; David Pistenmaa; Xian-Jin Xie; Yair Lotan; Claus Roehrborn; D Nathan Kim
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen after prostatectomy reliably identifies patients requiring postoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jung Julie Kang; Robert E Reiter; Michael L Steinberg; Christopher R King
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Biochemical recurrence without PSA progression characterizes a subset of patients after radical prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Rajesh Shinghal; Cheryl Yemoto; John E McNeal; James D Brooks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Salvage radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer and biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy : Long-term follow-up of a single-center survey.

Authors:  Gunnar Lohm; Jörg Lütcke; Basil Jamil; Stefan Höcht; Konrad Neumann; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Thomas Wiegel; Dirk Bottke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  The timing of salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher R King
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  External validation of the cancer of the prostate risk assessment-s score in koreans undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ki Taek Seong; Ju Hyun Lim; Chang Myon Park; Han Kwon Kim; Jong Yeon Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-07-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Does surgical delay for radical prostatectomy affect patient pathological outcome? A retrospective analysis from a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Kelsey Lawson; Mounsif Azizi; Emad Rajih; Abdullah Alenizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Cedric Lebacle; Thierry Lebeau; Serge Benayoun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  The very-high-risk prostate cancer: a contemporary update.

Authors:  R Mano; J Eastham; O Yossepowitch
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Current status of its use as a treatment endpoint and early management strategies.

Authors:  Barrett Z McCormick; Ali M Mahmoud; Stephen B Williams; John W Davis
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.