Literature DB >> 26757719

Oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes in transplant patients after radical prostatectomy.

Burkhard Beyer1, Philipp Mandel2, Uwe Michl1, Raisa S Pompe1, Valia Veleva1, Thomas Steuber1, Hartwig Huland1, Markus Graefen1, Derya Tilki3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oncological surgery in immunosuppressed patients with solid organ transplantation (Tx) is challenging. These patients are thought to have higher postoperative morbidity and an increased rate of tumour progression. The aim of the present study was to analyse oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes in Tx patients following radical prostatectomy (RP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2014, 30 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer underwent RP at our institution following Tx (kidney: n = 20, heart: n = 5, liver: n = 5). Functional, oncological and perioperative follow-ups were analysed. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45 months. Median PSA was 5.3 ng/ml. Intraoperative blood loss was 600 ml at a median operating time of 180 min. Surgery in kidney Tx patients was technically feasible. Major complications occurred in 3 patients (ureteral injury, lymphocele and haematoma). Histological evaluation revealed n = 18 ≤pT2 tumours (60.0 %), n = 7 pT3a tumours (23.3 %) and n = 5 ≥pT3b tumours (16.7 %). Continence rate 12 months after surgery, defined as no or one safety pad use, was 73.3 %, while 93.3 % of the patients used ≤2 pads/24 h. After the median follow-up of 45 months, BCR-free survival was 69.0 %. In recurrent men, there was suspicion of metastasis in one patient. No cancer-specific death was observed. Five-year overall survival was 94.4 %.
CONCLUSION: The complication rate in patients with solid organ transplantation after RP was low. While histopathological evaluation revealed disease characteristics comparable to non-transplant patients from current RP series, postoperative continence was worse. Immunosuppressive therapy does not seem to lead to an increased rate of tumour progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Transplant patients

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757719     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1758-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of malignancies following renal transplantation.

Authors:  A G Sheil
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on wound healing.

Authors:  Roshan Bootun
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  The effect of age on functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Philipp Mandel; Markus Graefen; Uwe Michl; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Excess risk of cancer in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Michèle Kessler; Nicolas Jay; Rachel Molle; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Do elderly patients deserve a kidney graft?

Authors:  P Nunes; A Mota; B Parada; A Figueiredo; F Rolo; C Bastos; F Macário
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Comparison of the incidence of malignancy in recipients of different types of organ: a UK Registry audit.

Authors:  D Collett; L Mumford; N R Banner; J Neuberger; C Watson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Cancer incidence among Canadian kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  P J Villeneuve; D E Schaubel; S S Fenton; F A Shepherd; Y Jiang; Y Mao
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy in immunosuppressed transplant recipients.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; R Jeffrey Karnes; Eric J Bergstralh; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Morbidity of retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: multicenter study from Renal Transplantation Committee of French Urological Association.

Authors:  François M Kleinclauss; Yann Neuzillet; Xavier Tillou; Nicolas Terrier; Guillaume Guichard; Jacques Petit; Eric Lechevallier
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; David Pfister; Andrea Thissen; Charlotte Piper; Daniel Porres
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-02-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Determinants of self-reported functional status (EPIC-26) in prostate cancer patients prior to treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Roth; Sebastian Dieng; Alisa Oesterle; Günter Feick; Günther Carl; Andreas Hinkel; Thomas Steiner; Björn Theodor Kaftan; Frank Kunath; Boris Hadaschik; Simba-Joshua Oostdam; Rein Jüri Palisaar; Mateusz Koralewski; Burkhard Beyer; Björn Haben; Igor Tsaur; Simone Wesselmann; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.