Literature DB >> 27513849

18F Fluorocholine Dynamic Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinical-Pathologic Comparisons.

Joon Young Choi1, Jaewon Yang1, Susan M Noworolski1, Spencer Behr1, Albert J Chang1, Jeffry P Simko1, Hao G Nguyen1, Peter R Carroll1, John Kurhanewicz1, Youngho Seo1.   

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the initial clinical value of fluorine 18 (18F) fluorocholine (FCH) dynamic positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by comparing its parameters with clinical-pathologic findings in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who plan to undergo radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and informed written consent was obtained from all subjects for this HIPAA-compliant study. Twelve men (mean age ± standard deviation, 61.7 years ± 8.4; range, 46-74 years) with untreated intermediate- to high-risk PCa characterized according to Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) underwent preoperative FCH dynamic PET/MR imaging followed by radical prostatectomy between April and November 2015. PET/MR imaging parameters including average and maximum K1 (delivery rate constant) and standardized uptake values (SUVs) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 scores were measured and compared with clinical-pathologic characteristics. For statistical analysis, the Spearman rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed. Results Of the PET parameters, maximum SUV of primary tumors showed significant correlations with several clinical-pathologic parameters including serum prostate-specific antigen level (ρ = 0.71, P = .01), pathologic stage (ρ = 0.59, P = .043), and postsurgical CAPRA score (ρ = 0.72, P = .008). The overall PI-RADS score showed significant correlations with pathologic tumor volume (ρ = 0.81, P < .001), percentage of tumor cells with Gleason scores greater than 3 (ρ = 0.59, P = .02), and postsurgical CAPRA score (ρ = 0.58, P = .046). The high-risk postsurgical CAPRA score patient group had a significantly higher maximum SUV than did the intermediate-risk group. Combined PET and MR imaging showed improved sensitivity (88%) for prediction of pathologic extraprostatic extension compared with that with MR imaging (50%) and PET (75%) performed separately. Conclusion Maximum SUVs and PI-RADS scores from FCH PET/MR imaging show good correlation with clinical-pathologic characteristics, such as postsurgical CAPRA score, which are related to prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk PCa. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27513849      PMCID: PMC5283870          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

Review 1.  Update on positron emission tomography for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Robert C Murphy; Mark A Nathan; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.369

2.  18F choline PET/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Larisa Imamovic; Gabriele Broinger; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Franz Stoiber; Michael Nader; Bernhard Gruy; Guenter Janetschek; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Simultaneous 18F choline positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: initial results.

Authors:  Axel Wetter; Christine Lipponer; Felix Nensa; Karsten Beiderwellen; Tobias Olbricht; Herbert Rübben; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Schlosser; Till A Heusner; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Usefulness of MRI-assisted metabolic volumetric parameters provided by simultaneous (18)F-fluorocholine PET/MRI for primary prostate cancer characterization.

Authors:  Yong-Il Kim; Gi Jeong Cheon; Jin Chul Paeng; Jeong Yeon Cho; Cheol Kwak; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; Euishin Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Mark S Litwin; David M Latini; Janeen Du Chane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Alberto Briganti; Pieter De Visschere; Mark Emberton; Gianluca Giannarini; Alex Kirkham; Samir S Taneja; Harriet Thoeny; Geert Villeirs; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes.

Authors:  J Mikel Hubanks; Stephen A Boorjian; Igor Frank; Matthew T Gettman; R Houston Thompson; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Combined PET imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of intermediate and high-risk primary prostate carcinomas with simultaneous [18F] choline PET/MRI.

Authors:  Axel Wetter; Felix Nensa; Marcus Schenck; Philipp Heusch; Thorsten Pöppel; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Forsting; Thomas W Schlosser; Thomas C Lauenstein; James Nagarajah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Kinetic Modeling Application to (18)F-fluoroethylcholine Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer Using Two-tissue Compartmental Model.

Authors:  Mustafa Takesh
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Effect of Time-of-Flight and Regularized Reconstructions on Quantitative Measurements and Qualitative Assessments in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer With 18F-Fluorocholine Dual Time Point PET/MRI.

Authors:  Spencer C Behr; Brett J Mollard; Jaewon Yang; Robert R Flavell; Randall A Hawkins; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Multiparametric [11C]Acetate positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment and staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephan H Polanec; Piotr Andrzejewski; Pascal A T Baltzer; Thomas H Helbich; Alexander Stiglbauer; Dietmar Georg; Georgios Karanikas; Martin Susani; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Margreiter; Markus Mitterhauser; Peter Brader; Katja Pinker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Imaging as a Personalized Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Kyle H Gennaro; Kristin K Porter; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Samuel J Galgano; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  Optimization of temporal sampling for 18F-choline uptake quantification in prostate cancer assessment.

Authors:  Xavier Palard-Novello; Anne-Lise Blin; Florence Le Jeune; Etienne Garin; Pierre-Yves Salaün; Anne Devillers; Giulio Gambarota; Solène Querellou; Patrick Bourguet; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  The Role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Characterization of High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer: Comparison with [11C]Choline PET/CT and Histopathological Analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zanoni; Riccardo Mei; Lorenzo Bianchi; Francesca Giunchi; Lorenzo Maltoni; Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone; Cristina Nanni; Irene Bossert; Antonella Matti; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Cristina Fonti; Filippo Lodi; Antonietta D'Errico; Eugenio Brunocilla; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging Predicting Intraprostatic Tumor Extent, Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion Prior to Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Christoph-Alexander J von Klot; Axel S Merseburger; Alena Böker; Sebastian Schmuck; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel; Markus A Kuczyk; Christoph Henkenberens; Hans Christiansen; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Wiebke Solass; Marcel Lafos; Thorsten Derlin
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.