Literature DB >> 20631203

Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans.

Alessandra Padiglia1, Andrea Zonza, Elena Atzori, Caterina Chillotti, Carla Calò, Beverly J Tepper, Iole Tomassini Barbarossa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The individual ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) may be correlated with body mass index (BMI) and differences in the salivary proteins involved in taste function, such as the zinc-dependent enzyme gustin, which is a trophic factor of taste buds.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the possible association of PROP taste responsiveness with gustin gene polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G), salivary ionic zinc concentrations, and BMI.
DESIGN: We measured cognitive eating behaviors and BMI in 75 volunteers (28 men and 47 women; mean plusmn SEM age: 25 plusmn 3 y). The intensity of taste perception evoked by PROP and sodium chloride solutions was estimated to evaluate PROP taster status. Salivary ionic zinc concentrations were measured, and molecular analyses of the gustin gene polymorphism were performed in individuals classified by PROP status by using polymerase chain reaction techniques.
RESULTS: We classified subjects as PROP supertasters (n = 27), medium tasters (n = 28), or nontasters (n = 20). Salivary ionic zinc concentrations and BMI were greater in nontasters than in supertasters (P = 0.003 and P = 0.042, respectively). Molecular analyses of gustin DNA showed that allele A and genotype AA were significantly more frequent in supertasters, whereas allele G and genotype GG were significantly more frequent in nontasters (P lt 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data showed that responsiveness to PROP is inversely related to BMI and salivary ionic zinc concentrations. The gustin gene dimorphism rs2274333 observed in supertaster and nontaster subjects may influence the protein conformation and, thereby, affect zinc ion binding. Our data showed a direct association between PROP sensitivity and a polymorphism in the gustin gene that is hypothesized to affect its function. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as UNICADBSITB-1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20631203     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  43 in total

1.  Salivary protein profiles are linked to bitter taste acceptance in infants.

Authors:  M Morzel; C Chabanet; C Schwartz; G Lucchi; P Ducoroy; S Nicklaus
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Bitter taste phenotype and body weight predict children's selection of sweet and savory foods at a palatable test-meal.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Annemarie Olsen; Terri L Cravener; Rachel Bloom; Wendy K Chung; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Karol Meyermann
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Changes in the salivary protein profile of morbidly obese women either previously subjected to bariatric surgery or not.

Authors:  Elsa Lamy; Carla Simões; Lénia Rodrigues; Ana Rodrigues Costa; Rui Vitorino; Francisco Amado; Célia Antunes; Isabel do Carmo
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.158

4.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Genetic analysis of chemosensory traits in human twins.

Authors:  Antti Knaapila; Liang-Dar Hwang; Anna Lysenko; Fujiko F Duke; Brad Fesi; Amin Khoshnevisan; Rebecca S James; Charles J Wysocki; MeeRa Rhyu; Michael G Tordoff; Alexander A Bachmanov; Emi Mura; Hajime Nagai; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Genetic taste blindness to bitter and body composition in childhood: a Mendelian randomization design.

Authors:  S H Bouthoorn; F J van Lenthe; J C Kiefte-de Jong; H R Taal; A I Wijtzes; A Hofman; V W V Jaddoe; M M Glymour; F Rivadeneira; H Raat
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

8.  Altered gene expression in the lower respiratory tract of Car6 (-/-) mice.

Authors:  Maarit S Patrikainen; Peiwen Pan; Harlan R Barker; Seppo Parkkila
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Wine Expertise Predicts Taste Phenotype.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Gary J Pickering
Journal:  Am J Enol Vitic       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney; Alissa L Allen
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.