Literature DB >> 25488512

Results of total hip arthroplasty using a bionic hip stem.

Samo K Fokter1, Taras Sarler, Andrej Strahovnik, Alenka Repše-Fokter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The trabecular-orientated bionic hip stem was designed to mimic the natural force transmission through the femur in total hip arthroplasty, resulting in supposedly longer prosthesis survivability. The aim of this study was to compare the second-generation bionic hip stem to a standard uncemented hip stem.
METHODS: A group of 18 patients (21 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty with a bionic stem (bionic group) was compared with a historic group of 12 patients (12 hips) treated with standard anatomic hip stem (control group). During the first year after the procedure, the densitometric measurements of the bone around the prosthesis were taken. Radiographic and clinical assessments were additionally performed preoperatively and at the three month, six month, one year and three year follow-ups in the bionic group.
RESULTS: In the bionic group, one patient was revised for aseptic loosening and 16 patients (19 hips) were available to the final follow-up. A significant decrease of bone mineral density was found in Gruen zones 3, 4 and 5 in the bionic group, and in zone 7 in both groups. The bionic group had a significantly higher bone mineral density in Gruen zone 1 at the one year follow-up. At the final follow-up, all prostheses were radiologically stable in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Provided that a good implant position is achieved, comparable short-term results can be obtained using a bionic stem. Still, a decrease of bone mineral density in Gruen zone 7 occurred in both groups. Further studies are required to determine survivability of the bionic stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488512     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2623-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P K Venesmaa; H P Kröger; H J Miettinen; J S Jurvelin; O T Suomalainen; E M Alhava
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  W Brodner; P Bitzan; F Lomoschitz; P Krepler; R Jankovsky; S Lehr; F Kainberger; F Gottsauner-Wolf
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

3.  The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Theofilos Karachalios; Christos Tsatsaronis; George Efraimis; Panagiotis Papadelis; George Lyritis; George Diakoumopoulos
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Biology of implant osseointegration.

Authors:  A F Mavrogenis; R Dimitriou; J Parvizi; G C Babis
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Changes of periprosthetic bone density after a cementless short hip stem: a clinical and radiological analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Jahnke; Sandra Engl; Corinna Altmeyer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [A biomechanical solution for permanent anchoring of artificial hip joint acetabula].

Authors:  F Copf; U Holz; S Vesel
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1983 May-Jun

7.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A prospective short-term outcome study of a short metaphyseal fitting total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim; Jong-Hwan Joo; Jang-Won Park
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  L F Grochola; B Habermann; N Mastrodomenico; A Kurth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Periprosthetic bone loss after insertion of an uncemented, customized femoral stem and an uncemented anatomical stem. A randomized DXA study with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mona Nysted; Pål Benum; Jomar Klaksvik; Olav Foss; Arild Aamodt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of implant composition on periprosthetic bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akira Morita; Naomi Kobayashi; Hyonmin Choe; Taro Tezuka; Toshihiro Misumi; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Restoration of proximal periprosthetic bone loss by denosumab in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Satoshi Nagoya; Kenji Tateda; Shunichiro Okazaki; Ima Kosukegawa; Junya Shimizu; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-05-17

Review 3.  Short-term success of proximal bone stock preservation in short hip stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sheryl de Waard; Jacqueline van der Vis; Pascale A H T Venema; Inger N Sierevelt; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

4.  Bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis--a prospective 5 year follow-up.

Authors:  Wolfram Steens; Friedrich Boettner; Rainer Bader; Ralf Skripitz; Alberto Schneeberger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.