Akira Morita1, Naomi Kobayashi2, Hyonmin Choe1, Taro Tezuka1, Toshihiro Misumi3, Yutaka Inaba1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan. naomik58@aol.com. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The severity of bone mineral density (BMD) loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on both implant- and patient-related factors. While implant fixation type is an important factor, but few studies have considered the effect of material composition on the same implant fixation type. In particular, differences in mechanical stiffness due to material composition are of great interest. Here, we compared changes in periprosthetic BMD after THA using proximal fixation concept stems comprising different titanium alloys, i.e., β titanium alloys stem and α + β titanium alloys stem. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 122 patients (β titanium alloys stem, 61 cases; α + β titanium alloys stem, 61 cases) who underwent primary THA between January 2009 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the change in periprosthetic BMD from base line. Age, body mass index, diagnosis, stem size, canal flare index, surgical approach, pre-operative lumbar BMD, and pre-operative activity scores were reviewed and changes in periprosthetic BMD between the two groups were compared using analysis of covariance. The secondary outcome was radiographic response after THA. RESULTS: There was significant difference in periprosthetic BMD in zone 6 and 7 at 2 years (p < 0.05) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in other zones. A significant difference in radiographic response was noted only for the Engh classification. CONCLUSION: α + β titanium alloys stem resulted in a significantly higher rate of BMD loss in zones 6 and 7 compared with the β titanium alloys stem. These results may be due to differences in mechanical stiffness due to the different titanium alloy composition of the prosthetics.
BACKGROUND: The severity of bone mineral density (BMD) loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on both implant- and patient-related factors. While implant fixation type is an important factor, but few studies have considered the effect of material composition on the same implant fixation type. In particular, differences in mechanical stiffness due to material composition are of great interest. Here, we compared changes in periprosthetic BMD after THA using proximal fixation concept stems comprising different titanium alloys, i.e., β titanium alloys stem and α + β titanium alloys stem. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 122 patients (β titanium alloys stem, 61 cases; α + β titanium alloys stem, 61 cases) who underwent primary THA between January 2009 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the change in periprosthetic BMD from base line. Age, body mass index, diagnosis, stem size, canal flare index, surgical approach, pre-operative lumbar BMD, and pre-operative activity scores were reviewed and changes in periprosthetic BMD between the two groups were compared using analysis of covariance. The secondary outcome was radiographic response after THA. RESULTS: There was significant difference in periprosthetic BMD in zone 6 and 7 at 2 years (p < 0.05) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in other zones. A significant difference in radiographic response was noted only for the Engh classification. CONCLUSION: α + β titanium alloys stem resulted in a significantly higher rate of BMD loss in zones 6 and 7 compared with the β titanium alloys stem. These results may be due to differences in mechanical stiffness due to the different titanium alloy composition of the prosthetics.
Authors: Jessica J Alm; Tatu J Mäkinen; Petteri Lankinen; Niko Moritz; Tero Vahlberg; Hannu T Aro Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.717