Literature DB >> 19516081

Biology of implant osseointegration.

A F Mavrogenis1, R Dimitriou, J Parvizi, G C Babis.   

Abstract

Osseointegration refers to a direct structural and functional connection between ordered, living bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant. Currently, an implant is considered as osseointegrated when there is no progressive relative movement between the implant and the bone with which it has direct contact. A direct bone contact as observed histologically may be indicative of the lack of a local or systemic biological response to that surface. It is therefore proposed that osseointegration is not the result of an advantageous biological tissue response but rather the lack of a negative tissue response. The rationale of the present review is to evaluate the basic science work performed on the concept of biology of osseointegration, and to discuss the specific factors as they may relate to osseous healing around an implant.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19516081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


  93 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of the bone integration of coated poly(vinyl-alcohol) hydrogel fiber implants.

Authors:  David Moreau; Arthur Villain; Manon Bachy; Henry Proudhon; David N Ku; Didier Hannouche; Hervé Petite; Laurent Corté
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive.

Authors:  Daniel J Huey; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Automating the processing steps for obtaining bone tissue-engineered substitutes: from imaging tools to bioreactors.

Authors:  Pedro F Costa; Albino Martins; Nuno M Neves; Manuela E Gomes; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Biological fixation of total hip arthroplasty: Facts and factors.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-15

6.  Degradation of Bioresorbable Mg-4Zn-1Sr Intramedullary Pins and Associated Biological Responses in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Aaron F Cipriano; Jiajia Lin; Alan Lin; Amy Sallee; Belinda Le; Mayra Celene Cortez Alcaraz; Ren-Guo Guan; Gary Botimer; Serkan Inceoğlu; Huinan Liu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Modification of titanium alloys surface properties by plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) and influence on biological response.

Authors:  Mónica Echeverry-Rendón; Oscar Galvis; Robinson Aguirre; Sara Robledo; Juan Guillermo Castaño; Félix Echeverría
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Results of total hip arthroplasty using a bionic hip stem.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Taras Sarler; Andrej Strahovnik; Alenka Repše-Fokter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Antonio Di Stefano; Andrea Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Pharmacologic augmentation of implant fixation in osteopenic bone.

Authors:  R D Ross; J L Hamilton; B M Wilson; D R Sumner; A S Virdi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.