Literature DB >> 11393782

Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.

P K Venesmaa1, H P Kröger, H J Miettinen, J S Jurvelin, O T Suomalainen, E M Alhava.   

Abstract

Insertion of a metallic implant into the femur changes bone loading conditions and results in remodeling of femoral bone. To quantify changes in bone mass after uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), we monitored femoral bone with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with Lunar DPX densitometry in seven Gruen zones and the total periprosthetic area at scheduled time intervals in 22 patients during a 3-year follow-up. BMD decreased significantly almost in all Gruen zones during the first 3 months, ranging from 3.4% to 14.4% (p < 0.05 top < 0.001). At the end of the first year, the most remarkable decrease in BMD was found in the calcar (zone 7; -22.9%). During the second postoperative year, a slight restoration of periprosthetic bone mass was recorded. During the third year, no significant changes in BMD were found. The preoperative BMD was the only factor that was significantly related to the periprosthetic bone loss. Clearly, the early periprosthetic bone loss noticed during the 3 months after THA is caused by mainly limited weight bearing to the operated hip and stress shielding. We suggest that the restoration of bone mass is a sign of successful osteointegration between bone and metallic implant. DXA is a suitable tool to follow the bone response to prosthetization and will increase our knowledge on the behavior of bone after THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11393782     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  51 in total

1.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.

Authors:  A I A Rahmy; T Gosens; G M Blake; A Tonino; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodeling after 12 years differs in cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Prakash Chandran; Mohammed Azzabi; Mark Andrews; John G Bradley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  The effectiveness of mono or combined osteoporosis drug therapy against bone mineral density loss around femoral implants after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Naoyuki Iwamoto; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Yohei Yukizawa; Hiroyuki Ike; Takashi Ishida; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  High pressure may inhibit periprosthetic osteogenesis.

Authors:  Kongzu Hu; Chengtao Wang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Results of total hip arthroplasty using a bionic hip stem.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Taras Sarler; Andrej Strahovnik; Alenka Repše-Fokter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Bone remodeling and hydroxyapatite resorption in coated primary hip prostheses.

Authors:  Alphons J Tonino; Bart C H van der Wal; Ide C Heyligers; Bernd Grimm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Antonio Di Stefano; Andrea Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.