Literature DB >> 25480626

Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Michael B Ujiki1, Matthew E Gitelis, Joann Carbray, Brittany Lapin, John Linn, Steven Haggerty, Chi Wang, Ryota Tanaka, Ermilo Barrera, Zeeshan Butt, Woody Denham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most common surgery in the world. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes are arguably the most important elements of successful repair. This study is aimed to describe short- and long-term quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
METHODS: We prospectively followed patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP) as part of an Institutional Review Board-approved study. HRQOL was measured preoperatively, or 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using Short Form 36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) and Carolinas Comfort Scale. Postoperative HRQOL scores were compared to baseline using paired t tests.
RESULTS: Between June 2009 and February 2014, 1,175 patients underwent TEP by four surgeons. Of those, 301 patients with 388 hernias were registered in the database and followed by a research coordinator. Mean age was 56.4 ± 15.2 years and 93% were male. Mean body mass index was 26.1 ± 3.7 kg/m(2). Seventy-eight percent presented with pain, the majority of which were described as mild. Hernias were unilateral right-sided in 43%, left-sided in 28%, and bilateral in 29 %. Eighty-five percent were primary hernias. Average operative time was 43.5 ± 17.9 min and there were no intraoperative complications. Urinary retention occurred in 6%. Visual analog scale at discharge was 1.9 ± 1.7. Analgesics were used an average of 2.5 ± 3.4 days and return to activities of daily living and work occurred on postoperative 5.5 ± 4.4 and 5.6 ± 3.9 days. Recurrence occurred in 2.1%. Significant improvements between baseline and 1 year were found in role limitations due to physical health (81.5 ± 25.6 vs. 91.8 ± 19.4, p = 0.02), social functioning (87.4 ± 21.3 vs. 92.9 ± 15.3, p = 0.02), and pain (78.2 ± 19.7 vs. 86.6 ± 15.9, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: TEP results in significant improvement in HRQOL including physical health, social functioning, and pain at 1 year. On average, patients are able to return to activities of daily living and work within a week.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480626     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4011-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  Ashraf E Abbas; Mohamed E Abd Ellatif; Nashat Noaman; Ahmad Negm; Gamal El-Morsy; Mahmoud Amin; Ahmad Moatamed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  K Lawrence; D McWhinnie; C Jenkinson; A Coulter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; H Kehlet; L Strand; J Malmstrøm; F H Andersen; P Wara; P Juul; T Callesen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M E Arregui; C J Davis; O Yucel; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-03

6.  Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  S Post; B Weiss; M Willer; T Neufang; D Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.

Authors:  J Wellwood; M J Sculpher; D Stoker; G J Nicholls; C Geddes; A Whitehead; R Singh; D Spiegelhalter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-11

8.  Patient-reported outcomes in hernia repair.

Authors:  E M Bitzer; C Lorenz; S Nickel; H Dörning; A Trojan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Predictors of chronic groin discomfort after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Shahzad M Ali; Benjamin Zendejas; Siddhant Yadav; Roberto C Hernandez-Irizarry; Christine M Lohse; David R Farley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Memon; N J Cooper; B Memon; M I Memon; K R Abrams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Chronic pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair using the COMI-hernia score.

Authors:  Ralph Fabian Staerkle; Raphael Nicolas Vuille-Dit-Bille; Lukas Fink; Christopher Soll; Peter Villiger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis.

Authors:  Lava Y Patel; Brittany Lapin; Matthew E Gitelis; Craig Brown; John G Linn; Stephen Haggerty; Woody Denham; Zeeshan Butt; Ermilo Barrera; Ray Joehl; JoAnn Carbray; Tyler Hall; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Maya L Moses; Cristina P Viso; Julie L Holihan; Juan R Flores-Gonzalez; Lillian S Kao; Tien C Ko; Mike K Liang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Clinical and Functional Outcome After Abdominal Wall Incisional Hernia Repair: Evaluation of Quality-of-Life Improvement and Comparison of Assessment Scales.

Authors:  Leo Licari; Giovanni Guercio; Sofia Campanella; Gregorio Scerrino; Sebastiano Bonventre; Roberta Tutino; Leonardo Gulotta; Giuseppe Profita; Dalila Scaturro; Giulia Letizia Mauro; Giuseppe Salamone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  A Parseliunas; S Paskauskas; V Simatoniene; J Vaitekunas; D Venskutonis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  Inguinal hernia mesh is safe in 1720 patients.

Authors:  Beau Forester; Mikhail Attaar; Maya Lach; Sebastian Chirayil; Kristine Kuchta; Woody Denham; John G Linn; Stephen P Haggerty; JoAnn Carbray; Michael Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after total extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP).

Authors:  E H H Mommers; D R M Hünen; J C H M van Hout; M Guit; J A Wegdam; S W Nienhuijs; T S de Vries Reilingh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Efficacy and safety of a novel partially absorbable mesh in totally extraperitoneal hernia repair.

Authors:  Hsien Wen Yang; Sang Hee Kang; Sung Yeop Jung; Byung Wook Min; Sun Il Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 9.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair - a systematic review.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Navid Tabriz; Bianca Sahlmann; Verena-Nicole Uslar
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-02-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.