Literature DB >> 22538670

Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial.

Ashraf E Abbas1, Mohamed E Abd Ellatif, Nashat Noaman, Ahmad Negm, Gamal El-Morsy, Mahmoud Amin, Ahmad Moatamed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hernia repair accounts for 10% of all hernia surgery. Potential benefits include reduction in postoperative pain, rapid recovery, lower recurrence rate, and fewer complications. The outcomes of health-related quality of life and patient perspective after hernia repair are our aim.
METHODS: Consecutive patients treated for unilateral uncomplicated groin hernia were enrolled after evaluation for inclusion. Participants were randomly distributed to receive either laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) (group I) or Lichtenstein repair (group II). Operative and postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and late complications were assessed early postoperatively, at 4 weeks, and every 6 months thereafter. Quality of life was assessed using Short Form-36 questionnaire in the first visit (after 4 weeks).
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-five patients of unilateral uncomplicated groin hernia were included; 88 patients (group I) were treated by TAPP, and 97 patients were treated by Lichtenstein repair (group II) with median follow-up of 17.9 months. Mean hospital stay, mean operative time, operative and postoperative complications were similar in the two groups. Quality of life showed better and significant outcomes in group I for physical function (p ≤ 0.001), role physical (p ≤ 0.011), bodily pain (p ≤ 0.017), general health (p ≤ 0.047), and total physical health (p ≤ 0.008). However, mental health showed no statistical significance in its four scales, but with better outcomes in group I. Total quality outcomes showed significantly better outcomes in group I (p ≤ 0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: TAPP hernia repair technique is a safe technique with low complication rate, less postoperative body pain, and better quality-of-life outcomes compared with open technique, being well accepted from the patient's perspective for quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538670     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2212-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic hernia repair--TAPP or/and TEP?

Authors:  B J Leibl; C Jäger; B Kraft; K Kraft; J Schwarz; M Ulrich; R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Coala trial group.

Authors:  M S Liem; J A Halsema; Y van der Graaf; A J Schrijvers; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.

Authors:  K McCormack; B Wake; J Perez; C Fraser; J Cook; E McIntosh; L Vale; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  [Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernia operation (TAPP)].

Authors:  L Krähenbühl; M Schäfer; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  H Pokorny; A Klingler; T Schmid; R Fortelny; C Hollinsky; R Kawji; E Steiner; H Pernthaler; R Függer; M Scheyer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Quality of life analysis after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair--retrospective study.

Authors:  Darko Srsen; Nikica Druzijanić; Zenon Pogorelić; Zdravko Perko; Josko Juricić; Damir Kraljević; Dragan Krnić; Kanito Bilan; Zeljko Mimica
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Amudha S Poobalan; Julie Bruce; W Cairns S Smith; Peter M King; Zygmunt H Krukowski; W Alastair Chambers
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A M Paganini; E Lezoche; F Carle; F Carlei; F Favretti; F Feliciotti; R Gesuita; M Guerrieri; D Lomanto; M Nardovino; M Panti; P Ribichini; L Sarli; M Sottili; A Tamburini; A Taschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  19 in total

1.  Outcomes and impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair versus open inguinal hernia repair on healthcare spending and employee absenteeism.

Authors:  Gurteshwar Rana; Priscila Rodrigues Armijo; Shariq Khan; Nathan Bills; Marsha Morien; Jianying Zhang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Health-related quality of life after TAPP repair for the sportsmen's groin.

Authors:  Gerwin A Bernhardt; Gerald Gruber; Benjamin S Molderings; Herwig Cerwenka; Mathias Glehr; Christian Giessauf; Peter Kornprat; Andreas Leithner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Justin B Dimick; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does peritoneal flap closure technique following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair make a difference in postoperative pain? A long-term quality of life comparison.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Steven A Groene; Tanu Prasad; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of testicular functions, sexual functions and quality of life following laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Asuri Krishna; Pratik Manek; Subodh Kumar; Omprakash Prajapati; Rajeshwari Subramaniam; Anand Kumar; Atin Kumar; Rajesh Sagar; M C Misra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive preperitoneal single-layer mesh repair versus standard Lichtenstein hernia repair for inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K Arslan; B Erenoglu; E Turan; H Koksal; O Dogru
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Surgeon utilization of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a population-based study.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Greta L Krapohl; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell; Justin B Dimick; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Authors:  Alyssa K Kosturakis; Kathryn E LaRusso; Nels D Carroll; Michael B Nicholl
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

9.  Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Michael B Ujiki; Matthew E Gitelis; Joann Carbray; Brittany Lapin; John Linn; Steven Haggerty; Chi Wang; Ryota Tanaka; Ermilo Barrera; Zeeshan Butt; Woody Denham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  [Quality of life and visceral surgery].

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; C Baltin; F Berlth; S P Mönig; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.