Literature DB >> 31579736

Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair - a systematic review.

Dirk Weyhe1, Navid Tabriz1, Bianca Sahlmann1, Verena-Nicole Uslar1.   

Abstract

The current literature suggests that perioperative complications occur in 8%-10% of all inguinal hernia repairs. However, the clinical relevance of these complications is currently unknown. In our review, based on 571,445 hernia repairs reported in 39 publications, we identified the following potential risk factors: patient age, ASA score, diabetes, smoking, mode of admission (emergency vs. elective surgery), surgery in low resource settings, type of anesthesia, and (in men) bilateral and sliding hernias. The most commonly reported complications are bleeding (0.9%), wound infection (0.5%), and pulmonary and cardiovascular complications (0.2%). In 3.9% of the included publications, a reliable grading of the reported complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification was possible. Using this classification retrospectively, we could show that, in patients with complications, these are clinically relevant for about 22% of these patients (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa). About 78% of all patients suffered from complications needing only minor (meaning mostly medical) intervention (Clavien-Dindo grade <III). Especially with regard to the low incidence of complications in inguinal hernia repair, future studies should use the Clavien-Dindo classification to achieve better comparability between studies, thus enabling better correlation with potential risk factors. ©2017 Weyhe D. et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien-Dindo classification; inguinal hernia surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 31579736      PMCID: PMC6754002          DOI: 10.1515/iss-2017-0008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Surg Sci        ISSN: 2364-7485


Introduction

For men, there is a lifelong risk of contracting an inguinal or femoral hernia of 27%–43%. For women, there is a risk of 3%–6% [1]. Throughout the world, about 20 million inguinal hernia repairs are performed every year. Thus, inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgeries worldwide. Although three professional societies have developed guidelines for the treatment of inguinal hernia [2], [3], [4], no consensus has been reached with regard to a standardized therapy. Since the introduction of mesh augmentation in hernia repair, a multitude of techniques have developed, each with respective inherent risk factors. In this context, complications are defined as an uncommon course of disease accompanied by particular symptoms. Complications may develop due to an underlying illness and/or due to the treatment of the disease. The severity of the complications may be classified using the seven-point Clavien-Dindo classification scale [5]. The scale is patient-oriented and uses the most important clinical consequences impacting the course of treatment. Most of the studies in this review do not use the classification. An overview of complications occurring perioperatively in inguinal hernia repair might best be achieved using registry data. The Swedish Hernia Registry, for instance, reports an overall complication rate of about 8% [6]. This is in line with Polak and Nyhus [7]. However, there is still some ambiguity with regard to the actual incidences of specific complications. For instance, a newly published review reports incidence rates for wound infection after hernia surgery of 2.4%, which is about twice as high as the incidence rate published in the Swedish registry and almost 10 times higher than the reports of the German Herniamed Registry [6], [8], [9]. Light or severe complications are often not clearly defined. For instance, seromas are mostly regarded as low-grade, common complications, whereas intraoperative or postoperative bleeding of anticoagulated patients may lead to major complications, including death [10]. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to offer an overview on potential risk factors with regard to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Materials and methods

Laparoendoscopic hernia surgery was established in the early 1990s. Case reports and studies dating back to this time were not included in this review due to the general learning curve for those techniques. Only actual evidence on complication potential was considered here. We conducted a literature search as described in Figure 1. All publications reporting perioperative outcome in relation to the specified risk factors in elective and emergency inguinal hernia repair were included. All reports concerning only chronic groin pain, which is often classified as a postoperative complication, were excluded.
Figure 1:

Flow chart of the literature search.

Flow chart of the literature search. Overall, 39 reports were found to be relevant to the research question. Of these, 3 were randomized controlled trials [11], [12], [13], 5 were prospective studies [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], 4 were case reports [10], [19], [20], [21], 25 were retrospective (registry) studies [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], and 2 were meta-analyses [47], [48]. Risk factors were identified. In addition, incidence rates were analyzed for various types of complications in 17 of the studies [11], [13], [15], [16], [18], [19], [20], [22], [24], [26], [29], [32], [36], [37], [38], [44]; if possible, the complications reported in the included studies were graded with regard to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Not all complications summarized here were reported in all of the studies. In addition, the amount of complications ranged from 1 to more than 4000 in the respective studies. For better comparison between studies, a weighting had to be implemented. Therefore, to normalize all data, the number of each respective complication reported was divided by the number of all complications reported in the respective study. The thusly calculated ratios were summed up over for each respective complication for all studies the respective complication was reported in. For example, Hellspong et al. [32] reported 2657 bleedings and 4744 complications overall, giving a ratio of 0.56. Mayer et al. [37] reported 203 bleedings and 934 complications overall, giving a ratio of 0.22. The sum of both ratios is 0.78. This method was used for all complications mentioned in all 18 studies.

Results

Analysis of risk factors and overall complication rate

In 39 studies, data of 571,445 hernia repairs were evaluated. The following risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia were identified: patient age [37], [41], ASA score [37], diabetes [32], smoking [35], [36], mode of admission (emergency vs. elective surgery) [39], [45], surgery in low resource settings [48], type of anesthesia [25], [39], and (in men) bilateral hernia [33], [39] and sliding hernia [30], [39]. Overall, 16,482 (2.9%) perioperative complications were reported. Of these, 23 were deaths corresponding to Clavien-Dindo grade V (0.004%). In low resource settings, the risk of death increases to 0.49%, thus being about 100 times higher than in developed countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, the risk of death even reaches 2.5% [48].

Analysis of specific complications

For further analysis, only one publication each concerning data from the Swedish registry and Herniamed was used. Thus, using the same patient collective, more than once was avoided. More specific information on the actual type of complication was given only in 17 of 39 studies with 345,746 of 571,445 hernia repairs. Overall incidence rates for other complications range between 0.0003% (bowel obstruction) and 0.86% (bleeding). The most commonly reported complications were bleeding, wound infection, and pulmonary and cardiovascular complications (see Figure 2).
Figure 2:

Distribution of 7985 reported incidences with regard to the type of complication.

Distribution of 7985 reported incidences with regard to the type of complication.

Grading according to Clavien-Dindo classification

Of the 16,482 complications, 651 (3.9%) were reliably classifiable according to Clavien-Dindo (see Figure 3). Clinically relevant complications include only grades IIIa to IV. Therefore, grades I and II were analyzed collectively. Grade V was already analyzed as mentioned above. Most reported incidences could be classified as Clavien-Dindo grades I and II (75%), indicating the need for only minor (mostly medical) intervention. Grade III, defined as requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention, was needed in 21.5% of all cases. Only 0.2% of all reported complications were classified as life-threatening complications (grade IV).
Figure 3:

For 651 of 7985 reported incidences, Clavien-Dindo classification was possible.

Depicted is the distribution of complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

For 651 of 7985 reported incidences, Clavien-Dindo classification was possible. Depicted is the distribution of complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Discussion

The risk of death as the most severe complication in inguinal hernia repair has an incidence of 0.004%, which is very low in developed countries. However, it may be up to 100 times higher in undeveloped countries. Incidence rates for specific perioperative complications are very low in our review (2.9% in this review and about 8% in the Swedish Hernia registry). We only regarded perioperative complications in this review. Therefore, we did not include chronic groin pain in our analysis, which is a commonly reported complication after inguinal hernia repair, explaining our relatively low overall complication rate. However, the aim of this review was not to evaluate the overall complication rate, as the focus was more on evaluating typical perioperative complications, calculating the potential impact of those complications on the patients’ treatment, and identifying risk factors associated with the respective complications. Our literature review shows that overall complication rates in inguinal hernia repair are low. However, we could identify risk factors for perioperative complications. For example, according to Nilsson et al. [39], the most relevant risk factors for 30-day morbidity after hernia repair are localization of the hernia (femoral vs. inguinal), patient age, ASA score, mode of admission (emergency vs. elective surgery), and type of anesthesia. In the Swedish registry, emergency surgery was more frequent in women compared to men (17 vs. 5%). For women, femoral hernia had occurred in 23% (2670 of 11.623) of all cases, whereas femoral hernia occurred only in 1% (1324 of 128.944) of all surgeries in men. For men, bilateral and sliding hernias pose an increased risk for complications. Patients >60 years old with emergency surgery show a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular complications within the first 30 days after surgery. Incidence rates of cardiovascular complications in our review (0.21% of all complications) are in line with the data from the Swedish registry (0.3–2.3%). Our data suggest that pulmonary and cardiovascular complications are among the five most frequent perioperative complications. Wound infection rate in low-risk environments are reported to be less than 5%. For patients with high comorbidity, the risk may rise to 8.7%. The most important risk factor for wound infection is bilateral surgery. Overall, there is some ambiguity in the data to that regard. For example, in the Swedish registry, 96% of all inguinal hernia repairs conducted in Sweden are documented. The registry data show that the postoperative infection rate is 1.2% in men and 1.5% in women. In the German Herniamed Registry, infections occur in 0.2% of all laparoendoscopic cases and in 0.6% of all open repairs. However, in Sweden, only 5.6% of the patients receive antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas in Germany 70% of all patients scheduled for inguinal hernia repair receive antibiotics [49]. In our review, 0.5% of all reported complications concern wound infection, which is in line with the German Herniamed Registry. In the literature, complications after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair range between 1.2% and 49% (median 11.4%). For totally extraperitoneal (TEP), the results are similar (1.3–50.3%; median 12.5%). Registry studies report lower complication rates for TAPP and TEP. The overall complication rate in the Herniamed registry is higher for TAPP (5.4%) than for TEP (2.9%) contrary to the Swiss Hernia Registry (TAPP 1.7% vs. TEP 4.2%) [28]. The incidence rate for visceral complications (e.g. puncture of the bladder or bowel) after TEP or TAPP is very low (0.2% and 0.6%, respectively). Bladder or bowel injury occurred in 0.3% (29 of 10,887) of all cases after TAPP and in 0.1% (7 of 6700) after TEP [9]. Irrespective of the surgery technique, we observed an incidence rate for visceral injury in 0.1% of all cases. Bleeding occurred more often in TEP than in TAPP (0.41% vs. 0.28) [50]. Including open repair, we detected a higher risk for bleeding of 0.9%. This observation is in line with published registry data [51]. Like every review, this review is limited due to incomplete reports in the publications and by missing definitions. For instance, we completely disregarded chronic groin pain in this review, because definition as well as the type of pain measurement are very heterogeneous. A newly published study evaluating pain measurement procedures after inguinal hernia repair [52] shows that 22 different definitions of pain were used in 48 studies. For the measurement of pain, 53 studies used 33 different procedures. Thus, developing reliable recommendations for preventive measures against chronic groin pain is very difficult. By graduating the complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, we could quantify the amount of clinically relevant complications. Overall, the risk for complications in inguinal hernia repair is low (2.9–8%). If complications occur, then in 78% of all cases they are manageable by conservative means (Clavien-Dindo grades I and II). Conversely, postoperative intervention was needed in 22% of all classifiable cases (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III). To our knowledge, routine documentation of complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification is not performed outside of study settings. Especially with regard to the low incidence of complications in inguinal hernia repair, future studies should use the Clavien-Dindo classification to achieve better comparability between studies, thus enabling better correlation with potential risk factors. Click here for additional data file.
  51 in total

1.  Diabetes as a risk factor in patients undergoing groin hernia surgery.

Authors:  Gustaf Hellspong; Ulf Gunnarsson; Ursula Dahlstrand; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Elma A O'Reilly; John P Burke; P Ronan O'Connell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Repair of inguinal hernia in the elderly. Results of the plug-and-patch repair with special reference to quality of life].

Authors:  J Zieren; H U Zieren; F Wenger; J M Müller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Complications of groin hernia repair.

Authors:  R Pollak; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Elderly: A Prospective Control Study.

Authors:  Simone Zanella; Antonios Vassiliadis; Francesco Buccelletti; Enrico Lauro; Francesco Ricci; Franco Lumachi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Laparoendoscopic single-site extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in 10 patients.

Authors:  Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; John Beatty; Tim Haefner; Ian Dunn; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  The safety of open inguinal herniorraphy in patients on chronic warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Elisabeth C McLemore; Kristi L Harold; Stephen S Cha; Daniel J Johnson; Richard J Fowl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair using polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures vs. self-fixating polypropylene mesh: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  G Chatzimavroudis; B Papaziogas; I Koutelidakis; I Galanis; S Atmatzidis; P Christopoulos; T Doulias; K Atmatzidis; J Makris
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Proportion of Surgical Site Infections Occurring after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erik Woelber; Emily J Schrick; Bradford D Gessner; Heather L Evans
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.150

10.  Psychological stress impairs early wound repair following surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth Broadbent; Keith J Petrie; Patrick G Alley; Roger J Booth
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Are immunosuppressive conditions and preoperative corticosteroid treatment risk factors in inguinal hernia repair?

Authors:  M Varga; F Köckerling; F Mayer; M Lechner; R Fortelny; R Bittner; K Borhanian; D Adolf; R Bittner; K Emmanuel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with inguinal hernia.

Authors:  F Köckerling; M Maneck; C Günster; D Adolf; M Hukauf
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  [Outcomes of patients experiencing cardiovascular adverse events within 1 year following craniotomy for intracranial aneurysm clipping: a retrospective cohort study].

Authors:  N Chen; R Li; E Wang; D Hu; Z Tang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 4.  Difficulties in Diagnosing Extraperitoneal Ureteroinguinal Hernias: A Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience of a Rare Encounter in Acute Surgical Care Settings.

Authors:  Catalin Pirvu; Stelian Pantea; Alin Popescu; Mirela Loredana Grigoras; Felix Bratosin; Andrei Valceanu; Tudorel Mihoc; Vlad Dema; Mircea Selaru
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Perioperative outcome in groin hernia repair: what are the most important influencing factors?

Authors:  F Köckerling; D Adolf; R Lorenz; B Stechemesser; A Kuthe; J Conze; B Lammers; R Fortelny; F Mayer; K Zarras; W Reinpold; H Hoffmann; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  New Persistent Opioid Use After Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Ryan Howard; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Chad Brummett; Jennifer Waljee; Michael Englesbe; Dana Telem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 13.787

7.  Modified Halsted's operation for inguinal hernia repair: A new technique.

Authors:  Omar Salem Khattab Alomar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-19

8.  Prevention and management of intraoperative complication during single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair.

Authors:  Sungwoo Jung; Jin Ho Lee; Jae Uk Chong; Hyung Soon Lee
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2022-03-15

9.  Hospital volume and outcome in inguinal hernia repair: analysis of routine data of 133,449 patients.

Authors:  M Maneck; F Köckerling; C Fahlenbrach; C D Heidecke; G Heller; H J Meyer; U Rolle; E Schuler; B Waibel; E Jeschke; C Günster
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.

Authors:  F Köckerling; A J Sheen; F Berrevoet; G Campanelli; D Cuccurullo; R Fortelny; H Friis-Andersen; J F Gillion; J Gorjanc; D Kopelman; M Lopez-Cano; S Morales-Conde; J Österberg; W Reinpold; R K J Simmermacher; M Smietanski; D Weyhe; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.