Literature DB >> 28828517

Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life.

Deepa V Cherla1,2,3, Maya L Moses4, Cristina P Viso4, Julie L Holihan4,5, Juan R Flores-Gonzalez4, Lillian S Kao4,5, Tien C Ko4, Mike K Liang4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The modified Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) is a 13-question abdominal wall quality of life (AW-QOL) survey validated in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). No studies have assessed AW-QOL among individuals without abdominal wall pathology. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the modified AAS and its implications for the threshold at which VHR should be offered also remain unknown. Our objectives were to (1) establish the AW-QOL of patients with a clinical abdominal wall hernia versus those with no hernia, (2) determine the MCID of the modified AAS, and (3) identify the baseline quality of life (QOL) score at which patients derive little clinical benefit from VHR.
METHODS: Patient-centered outcomes data for all patients presenting to General Surgery and Hernia Clinics October-December 2016 at a single safety-net institution were collected via a prospective, cross-sectional observational study design. Primary outcome was QOL measured using the modified AAS. Secondary outcome was the MCID.
RESULTS: Patients with no hernia had modified AAS scores of 81.6 (50.4-94.4), while patients with a clinically apparent hernia had lower modified AAS scores of 31.4 (12.6-58.7) (p < 0.001). The MCID threshold was 7.6 for a "slight" change and 14.9 for "definite" change. Above a modified AAS score of 81, the risk of worsening a patient's QOL by surgery is higher than the chances of improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: VHR can improve 1-year postsurgical AW-QOL to levels similar to that of the general population. The MCID of the modified AAS is 7.6 points. Patients with high baseline scores should be counseled about the lack of potential benefit in QOL from elective VHR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28828517     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4173-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Is Nonoperative Management Warranted in Ventral Hernia Patients With Comorbidities?: A Case-matched, Prospective, Patient-centered Study.

Authors:  Julie L Holihan; Blake E Henchcliffe; Jiandi Mo; Juan R Flores-Gonzalez; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eva B Deerenberg; Joris J Harlaar; Ewout W Steyerberg; Harold E Lont; Helena C van Doorn; Joos Heisterkamp; Bas Pl Wijnhoven; Willem R Schouten; Huib A Cense; Hein Bac Stockmann; Frits J Berends; F Paul Hlj Dijkhuizen; Roy S Dwarkasing; An P Jairam; Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia.

Authors:  R Le Huu Nho; D Mege; M Ouaïssi; I Sielezneff; B Sastre
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.043

4.  Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  K Itatsu; Y Yokoyama; G Sugawara; H Kubota; Y Tojima; Y Kurumiya; H Kono; H Yamamoto; M Ando; M Nagino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain.

Authors:  Eske K Aasvang; Eliza Gmaehle; Jeanette B Hansen; Bjorn Gmaehle; Julie L Forman; Jochen Schwarz; Reinhard Bittner; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Assessment of patient functional status after surgery.

Authors:  Martin McCarthy; Olga Jonasson; Chih-Hung Chang; A Simon Pickard; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; James Gibbs; Perry Edelman; Robert Fitzgibbons; Leigh Neumayer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Carolinas Comfort Scale as a Measure of Hernia Repair Quality of Life: A Reappraisal Utilizing 3788 International Patients.

Authors:  B Todd Heniford; Amy E Lincourt; Amanda L Walters; Paul D Colavita; Igor Belyansky; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Design and implementation of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care.

Authors:  B K Poulose; S Roll; J W Murphy; B D Matthews; B Todd Heniford; G Voeller; W W Hope; M I Goldblatt; G L Adrales; M J Rosen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function.

Authors:  David M Krpata; Brian J Schmotzer; Susan Flocke; Judy Jin; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Bridget Ermlich; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  7 in total

1.  Are online surgical discussion boards a safe and useful venue for surgeons to ask for advice? A review of the International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group.

Authors:  Karla Bernardi; Alexis N Milton; William Hope; John Scott Roth; Shinil K Shah; Puja Shah; Nicole B Lyons; Alexander C Martin; Julie L Holihan; Deepa V Cherla; Tien C Ko; Tyler G Hughes; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An evaluation of clinical and quality of life outcomes after ventral hernia repair with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh.

Authors:  A N Christopher; M P Morris; V Patel; J A Mellia; C Fowler; C A Messa; R B Broach; J P Fischer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Clinical and Functional Outcome After Abdominal Wall Incisional Hernia Repair: Evaluation of Quality-of-Life Improvement and Comparison of Assessment Scales.

Authors:  Leo Licari; Giovanni Guercio; Sofia Campanella; Gregorio Scerrino; Sebastiano Bonventre; Roberta Tutino; Leonardo Gulotta; Giuseppe Profita; Dalila Scaturro; Giulia Letizia Mauro; Giuseppe Salamone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A retrospective comparison of outcomes after open anterior and posterior component separation by a single surgical team.

Authors:  Ramesh Punjani; Eham Arora; Emily Coughlin; Rahul Mhaskar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Synthetic versus Biologic Mesh for Complex Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Oscar A Olavarria; Karla Bernardi; Naila H Dhanani; Nicole B Lyons; John A Harvin; Stefanos G Millas; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.853

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Oscar A Olavarria; Karla Bernardi; Shinil K Shah; Todd D Wilson; Shuyan Wei; Claudia Pedroza; Elenir B Avritscher; Michele M Loor; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-07-14

7.  Health-related quality of life in abdominal wall hernia: let's ask patients what matters to them?

Authors:  O A Smith; M F Mierzwinski; P Chitsabesan; S Chintapatla
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.920

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.