Onur Asan1, Enid Montague2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 750 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. enid.montague@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of video-based observation research methods in primary care environment and highlight important methodological considerations and provide practical guidance for primary care and human factors researchers conducting video studies to understand patient-clinician interaction in primary care settings. METHODS: We reviewed studies in the literature which used video methods in health care research, and we also used our own experience based on the video studies we conducted in primary care settings. RESULTS: This paper highlighted the benefits of using video techniques, such as multi-channel recording and video coding, and compared "unmanned" video recording with the traditional observation method in primary care research. We proposed a list that can be followed step by step to conduct an effective video study in a primary care setting for a given problem. This paper also described obstacles, researchers should anticipate when using video recording methods in future studies. CONCLUSION: With the new technological improvements, video-based observation research is becoming a promising method in primary care and HFE research. Video recording has been under-utilised as a data collection tool because of confidentiality and privacy issues. However, it has many benefits as opposed to traditional observations, and recent studies using video recording methods have introduced new research areas and approaches.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of video-based observation research methods in primary care environment and highlight important methodological considerations and provide practical guidance for primary care and human factors researchers conducting video studies to understand patient-clinician interaction in primary care settings. METHODS: We reviewed studies in the literature which used video methods in health care research, and we also used our own experience based on the video studies we conducted in primary care settings. RESULTS: This paper highlighted the benefits of using video techniques, such as multi-channel recording and video coding, and compared "unmanned" video recording with the traditional observation method in primary care research. We proposed a list that can be followed step by step to conduct an effective video study in a primary care setting for a given problem. This paper also described obstacles, researchers should anticipate when using video recording methods in future studies. CONCLUSION: With the new technological improvements, video-based observation research is becoming a promising method in primary care and HFE research. Video recording has been under-utilised as a data collection tool because of confidentiality and privacy issues. However, it has many benefits as opposed to traditional observations, and recent studies using video recording methods have introduced new research areas and approaches.
Authors: J B Cooper; D Barron; R Blum; J K Davison; D Feinstein; J Halasz; D Raemer; R Russell Journal: J Clin Anesth Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 9.452
Authors: John W Beasley; Terry H Hankey; Rodney Erickson; Kurt C Stange; Marlon Mundt; Marguerite Elliott; Pamela Wiesen; James Bobula Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Christopher Pearce; Kathryn Dwan; Michael Arnold; Christine Phillips; Stephen Trumble Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Anthony Dowell; Maria Stubbe; Lindsay Macdonald; Rachel Tester; Lesley Gray; Sue Vernall; Tim Kenealy; Nicolette Sheridan; Barbara Docherty; Devi-Ann Hall; Deborah Raphael; Kevin Dew Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Stephen G Henry; Anne Elizabeth Clark White; Elizabeth M Magnan; Eve Angeline Hood-Medland; Melissa Gosdin; Richard L Kravitz; Peter Joseph Torres; Jennifer Gerwing Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-06-03
Authors: Charlotte Gjørup Pedersen; Lea Høj Høstrup; Birgitte Bitsch Gadager; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Thomas Maribo; Louise Sofia Madsen Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 1.792
Authors: Milisa Manojlovich; Richard M Frankel; Molly Harrod; Alaa Heshmati; Timothy Hofer; Elizabeth Umberfield; Sarah Krein Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: L L Daniel Lai; Sebastian J Crutch; Julian West; Emma Harding; Emilie V Brotherhood; Rohan Takhar; Nicholas Firth; Paul M Camic Journal: Wellcome Open Res Date: 2021-06-18
Authors: C Emilson; P Åsenlöf; S Pettersson; S Bergman; M Sandborgh; C Martin; I Demmelmaier Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 2.362