Literature DB >> 30007915

Formative evaluation of the video reflexive ethnography method, as applied to the physician-nurse dyad.

Milisa Manojlovich1, Richard M Frankel2, Molly Harrod3, Alaa Heshmati4, Timothy Hofer3,5, Elizabeth Umberfield1, Sarah Krein3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research and interventions, poor communication between physicians and nurses continues to be a primary contributor to adverse events in the hospital setting and a major challenge to improving patient safety. The lack of progress suggests that it is time to consider alternative approaches with greater potential to identify and improve communication than those used to date. We conducted a formative evaluation to assess the feasibility, acceptability and utility of using video reflexive ethnography (VRE) to examine, and potentially improve, communication between nurses and physicians.
METHODS: We begin with a brief description of the institutional review boardapproval process and recruitment activities, then explain how we conducted the formative evaluation by describing (1) the VRE process itself; (2) our assessment of the exposure to the VRE process; and (3) challenges encountered and lessons learnt as a result of the process, along with suggestions for change.
RESULTS: Our formative evaluation demonstrates that it is feasible and acceptable to video-record communication between physicians and nurses during patient care rounds across many units at a large, academic medical centre. The lessons that we learnt helped to identify procedural changes for future projects. We also discuss the broader application of this methodology as a possible strategy for improving other important quality and safety practices in healthcare settings.
CONCLUSIONS: The VRE process did generate increased reflection in both nurse and physician participants. Moreover, VRE has utility in assessing communication and, based on the comments of our participants, can serve as an intervention to possibly improve communication, with implications for patient safety. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; patient safety; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30007915      PMCID: PMC6548313          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  21 in total

1.  How Kaiser Permanente uses video ethnography of patients for quality improvement, such as in shaping better care transitions.

Authors:  Esther B Neuwirth; Jim Bellows; Ana H Jackson; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions.

Authors:  M E J L Hulscher; M G H Laurant; R P T M Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

3.  Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video-reflexive ethnography.

Authors:  Katherine Carroll; Rick Iedema; Ross Kerridge
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2008-03

Review 4.  Patients, doctors, and videotape: a prescription for creating optimal healing environments?

Authors:  Richard M Frankel; Sue Hee Sung; John T Hsu
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.579

5.  Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned?

Authors:  Lucian L Leape; Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative.

Authors:  L Leape; D Berwick; C Clancy; J Conway; P Gluck; J Guest; D Lawrence; J Morath; D O'Leary; P O'Neill; D Pinakiewicz; T Isaac
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-12

Review 7.  Audio-visual recording of patient-GP consultations for research purposes: a literature review on recruiting rates and strategies.

Authors:  Markus Themessl-Huber; Gerry Humphris; Jon Dowell; Steve Macgillivray; Rosemary Rushmer; Brian Williams
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-03-19

8.  Communication failure: basic components, contributing factors, and the call for structure.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dayton; Kerm Henriksen
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-01

9.  Context, culture and (non-verbal) communication affect handover quality.

Authors:  Richard M Frankel; Mindy Flanagan; Patricia Ebright; Alicia Bergman; Colleen M O'Brien; Zamal Franks; Andrew Allen; Angela Harris; Jason J Saleem
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Creating safety by strengthening clinicians' capacity for reflexivity.

Authors:  Rick Iedema
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  3 in total

1.  Which Factors Promote Shared Understanding Between Physicians and Nurses in Inpatient Oncology Care Settings?: A Qualitative Exploration.

Authors:  Kaycee Crist; Megan Lafferty; Elizabeth Umberfield; Milisa Manojlovich
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Enriching medical trainees' learning through practice: a video reflexive ethnography study protocol.

Authors:  Christy Noble; Stephen Billett; Joanne Hilder; Andrew Teodorczuk; Rola Ajjawi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Feasibility of video recording interpersonal interactions between patients and hospital staff during usual care.

Authors:  Angela L Todd; Lynette Roberts; Kirsty Foster
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-04-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.