Literature DB >> 32576422

Making the most of video recorded clinical encounters: Optimizing impact and productivity through interdisciplinary teamwork.

Stephen G Henry1, Anne Elizabeth Clark White2, Elizabeth M Magnan3, Eve Angeline Hood-Medland2, Melissa Gosdin4, Richard L Kravitz2, Peter Joseph Torres5, Jennifer Gerwing6.   

Abstract

Patient-clinician interactions are central to technical and interpersonal processes of medical care. Video recordings of these interactions provide a rich source of data and a stable record that allows for repeated viewing and analysis. Collecting video recordings requires navigating ethical and feasibility constraints; further, realizing the potential of video requires specialized research skills. Interdisciplinary collaborations involving practitioners, medical educators, and social scientists are needed to provide the clinical perspectives, methodological expertise, and capacity needed to make collecting video worthwhile. Such collaboration ensures that research questions will be based on scholarship from the social sciences, resonate with practice, and produce results that fit educational needs. However, the literature lacks suggested practices for building and sustaining interdisciplinary research collaborations involving video data. In this paper, we provide concrete advice based on our experience collecting and analyzing a single set of video-recorded clinical encounters and non-video data, which have so far yielded nine distinct studies. We present the research process, timeline, and advice based on our experience with interdisciplinary collaboration. We found that integrating disciplines and traditions required patience, compromise, and mutual respect; learning from each other enhanced our enjoyment of the process, our productivity, and the clinical relevance of our research.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health communication; Interdisciplinary research; Professional-Patient relations; Research methodology; Video recording

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32576422      PMCID: PMC7508819          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  25 in total

1.  Effects of mode of presentation on ratings of empathic communication in medical interviews.

Authors:  Jennifer Nicolai; Ralf Demmel; Karin Farsch
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-11-30

2.  Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES).

Authors:  Christa Zimmermann; Lidia Del Piccolo; Jozien Bensing; Svein Bergvik; Hanneke De Haes; Hilde Eide; Ian Fletcher; Claudia Goss; Cathy Heaven; Gerry Humphris; Young-Mi Kim; Wolf Langewitz; Ludwien Meeuwesen; Matthias Nuebling; Michela Rimondini; Peter Salmon; Sandra van Dulmen; Larry Wissow; Linda Zandbelt; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-04-28

3.  Gestures convey content: an exploration of the semantic functions of physicians' gestures.

Authors:  Jennifer Gerwing; Anne Marie Landmark Dalby
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-07-22

4.  Building Trust Between Institutional Review Boards and Researchers.

Authors:  Stephen G Henry; Patrick S Romano; Mark Yarborough
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Methods to improve reliability of video-recorded behavioral data.

Authors:  Kim Kopenhaver Haidet; Judith Tate; Dana Divirgilio-Thomas; Ann Kolanowski; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Comparing audio and video data for rating communication.

Authors:  Kristine Williams; Ruth Herman; Daniel Bontempo
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Methods for assessing patient-clinician communication about depression in primary care: what you see depends on how you look.

Authors:  Stephen G Henry; Bo Feng; Peter Franks; Robert A Bell; Daniel J Tancredi; Dustin Gottfeld; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Comparison of audio vs. audio + video for the rating of shared decision making in oncology using the observer OPTION5 instrument: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Gionfriddo; Megan E Branda; Cara Fernandez; Aaron Leppin; Kathleen J Yost; Brittany Kimball; Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla; Laura Larrea; Katherine E Nowakowski; Victor M Montori; Jon Tilburt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Communication about chronic pain and opioids in primary care: impact on patient and physician visit experience.

Authors:  Stephen G Henry; Robert A Bell; Joshua J Fenton; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 10.  Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; John Witton; Diana R Elbourne
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visit Linearity in Primary Care Visits for Patients with Chronic Pain on Long-term Opioid Therapy.

Authors:  Anne Elizabeth Clark White; Eve Angeline Hood-Medland; Richard L Kravitz; Stephen G Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunisation (MI4MI) study: a protocol for an implementation study of a clinician vaccine communication intervention for prenatal care settings.

Authors:  Sarah E Brewer; Jessica R Cataldi; Mary Fisher; Russell E Glasgow; Kathleen Garrett; Sean T O'Leary
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.