Literature DB >> 19300310

Physician gender affects how physician nonverbal behavior is related to patient satisfaction.

Marianne Schmid Mast1, Judith A Hall, Christina Köckner, Elisa Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physician and patient gender both influence medical communication. Nonverbal behavior is generally under-researched in the medical encounter but plays an important role for patient outcomes such as satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: This article aims at identifying how specific physician nonverbal behaviors predict analogue patient satisfaction depending on physician and patient gender. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Eleven physicians in a real medical encounter were videotaped and analogue patients indicated their satisfaction with each physician while viewing the videotapes.
SUBJECTS: One hundred sixty-three university students participated (analogue patients). MEASURES: From the videotapes, 17 physician nonverbal behaviors (related to face, body, voice/speech), 2 physician appearance cues, 2 characteristics of the examination room, and 1 patient behavior were coded. For each analogue patient, the correlation between each of these coded characteristics and the patient's satisfaction was calculated, across all physicians and across male and female physicians separately.
RESULTS: There was no main effect for patient gender but most coded characteristics showed different relations to patient satisfaction according to physician gender. Analogue patients were most satisfied with female physicians who behaved in line with the female gender role (eg, more gazing, more forward lean, softer voice) while still stressing their professionalism (laboratory coat, medical-looking examination room). For male physicians, satisfaction was high for a broader range of behaviors, partly related to their gender role (eg, louder voice, more distance to patient).
CONCLUSIONS: To be satisfied, patients expect female and male physicians to show different patterns of nonverbal behavior. Awareness of these gender-specific expectations should be taken into account in medical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19300310     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e1877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  26 in total

Review 1.  Corneal blindness and current major treatment concern-graft scarcity.

Authors:  Kah Hie Wong; Ka Wai Kam; Li Jia Chen; Alvin L Young
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Medical students' skills and needs for training in breaking bad news.

Authors:  Friedrich Stiefel; Céline Bourquin; Carine Layat; Sara Vadot; Raphael Bonvin; Alexandre Berney
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Stereotyping in the digital age: Male language is "ingenious", female language is "beautiful" - and popular.

Authors:  Tabea Meier; Ryan L Boyd; Matthias R Mehl; Anne Milek; James W Pennebaker; Mike Martin; Markus Wolf; Andrea B Horn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dynamic modeling of patient and physician eye gaze to understand the effects of electronic health records on doctor-patient communication and attention.

Authors:  Enid Montague; Onur Asan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Modeling eye gaze patterns in clinician-patient interaction with lag sequential analysis.

Authors:  Enid Montague; Jie Xu; Ping-Yu Chen; Onur Asan; Bruce P Barrett; Betty Chewning
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  The Nonverbal Accommodation Analysis System (NAAS): initial application and evaluation.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-20

7.  Ophthalmic malpractice and physician gender: a claims data analysis (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Tamara R Fountain
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2014

8.  Hostile sexist male patients and female doctors: a challenging encounter.

Authors:  Christina Klöckner Cronauer; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Nonverbal sensitivity in medical students: implications for clinical interactions.

Authors:  Judith A Hall; Debra L Roter; Danielle C Blanch; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Communication and outcomes of visits between older patients and nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Dorothy Ann Gilbert; Eileen Hayes
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.