Literature DB >> 24520945

Acetabular cartilage assessment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement by using T2* mapping with arthroscopic verification.

Jutta Ellermann1, Connor Ziegler, Mikko J Nissi, Rainer Goebel, John Hughes, Michael Benson, Peter Holmberg, Patrick Morgan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of T2* mapping to help differentiate damaged from normal acetabular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. The study complied with HIPAA guidelines. The authors reviewed T2* relaxation time maps of 28 hips from 26 consecutive patients (mean patient age, 28.2 years; range, 12-53 years; eight male patients (nine hips) with a mean age of 26.7 years [range, 16-53 years]; 18 female patients (19 hips) with a mean age of 28.9 years [range, 12-46 years]). Conventional diagnostic 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography was augmented by including a multiecho gradient-recalled echo sequence for T2* mapping. After imaging, acetabular and femoral data were separated and acetabular regions of interest were identified. Arthroscopic cartilage assessment with use of a modified Beck scale for acetabular cartilage damage was performed by an orthopedic surgeon who was blinded to the results of T2* mapping. A patient-specific acetabular projection with a T2* overlay was developed to anatomically correlate imaging data with those from surgery (the standard of reference). Results were analyzed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: The patient-specific acetabular projection enabled co-localization between the MR imaging and arthroscopic findings. T2* relaxation times for normal cartilage (Beck score 1, 35.3 msec ± 7.0) were significantly higher than those for cartilage with early changes (Beck score 2, 20.7 msec ± 6.0) and cartilage with more advanced degeneration (Beck scores 3-6, ≤19.8 msec ± 5.6) (P < .001). At ROC curve analysis, a T2* value of 28 msec was identified as the threshold for damaged cartilage, with a 91% true-positive and 13% false-positive rate for differentiating Beck score 1 cartilage (normal) from all other cartilages.
CONCLUSION: The patient-specific acetabular projection with a T2* mapping overlay enabled good anatomic localization of cartilage damage defined with a T2* threshold of 28 msec and less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24520945     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Elite Rowers Demonstrate Consistent Patterns of Hip Cartilage Damage Compared With Matched Controls: A T2* Mapping Study.

Authors:  Bernd Bittersohl; Chiara Benedikter; Alexander Franz; Tobias Hesper; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish S Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Riley; Emily J McWalter; Kathryn J Stevens; Marc R Safran; Riccardo Lattanzi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  T2* Mapping Provides Information That Is Statistically Comparable to an Arthroscopic Evaluation of Acetabular Cartilage.

Authors:  Patrick Morgan; Mikko J Nissi; John Hughes; Shabnam Mortazavi; Jutta Ellermann
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  T2* relaxation time of acetabular and femoral cartilage with and without intraarticular gadopentetate dimeglumine in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Mikko J Nissi; Shabnam Mortazavi; John Hughes; Patrick Morgan; Jutta Ellermann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Christina Neugroda; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Christine L Abraham; Neal K Bangerter; Lance S McGavin; Christopher L Peters; Alex J Drew; Christopher J Hanrahan; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Using a simplified version of a common surgical grading scale for acetabular labral tears improves the utility of preoperative hip MRI for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Patrick Morgan; Amanda Crawford; Shelly Marette; Takashi Takahashi; Joseph Luchsinger; James Kirkham; Baolin Wu; Jutta M Ellermann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Diagnostic performance of direct traction MR arthrography of the hip: detection of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Andrea Klauser; Michael Kogler; Benjamin Henninger; Thomas Forstner; Markus Reichkendler; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The influences of different spatial resolutions on the characteristics of T2 relaxation times in articular cartilage: A coarse-graining study of the microscopic magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhuang; Ji Hyun Lee; Farid Badar; Jianrong Xu; Yang Xia
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 10.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Stephanie Pun; Deepak Kumar; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.995

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.