OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of axial traction during MR arthrography (MRA) of the elbow joint on joint space widening, contrast dispersion between opposing cartilage surfaces and cartilage surface visibility. METHODS: 11 patients with elbow MRA with and without axial traction were prospectively studied. Two radiologists independently measured the elbow joint space width and semi-quantitatively graded contrast material dispersion between the opposing cartilage surfaces as well as the articular cartilage surface visibility before and after traction. The detection and visibility of articular cartilage defects were also compared before and after traction. Patients were instructed to report on pain or any other symptoms during elbow traction. RESULTS: No patient reported discomfort, pain or any other symptoms related to traction on immediate and intermediate-term follow-up. Joint space width increased, more at the radiocapitellar joint space (Δ = 0.63 mm, p = 0.005) than at the ulnotrochlear joint space (Δ = 0.17 mm, p = 0.012), with contrast dispersion into the radiocapitellar joint and cartilage visibility of the radiocapitellar joint space significantly improving after traction (all p < 0.05). All of these parameters also improved at the ulnotrochlear joint, although this did not reach statistical significance. Traction improved the visibility of cartilage defects. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the effect of traction on MRA of the elbow joint. This technique is safe and technically feasible. Traction MRA improves the cartilage surface visibility and cartilage defect visibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This technique is safe and technically feasible. Traction MRA improves cartilage surface visibility and cartilage defect visibility.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of axial traction during MR arthrography (MRA) of the elbow joint on joint space widening, contrast dispersion between opposing cartilage surfaces and cartilage surface visibility. METHODS: 11 patients with elbow MRA with and without axial traction were prospectively studied. Two radiologists independently measured the elbow joint space width and semi-quantitatively graded contrast material dispersion between the opposing cartilage surfaces as well as the articular cartilage surface visibility before and after traction. The detection and visibility of articular cartilage defects were also compared before and after traction. Patients were instructed to report on pain or any other symptoms during elbow traction. RESULTS: No patient reported discomfort, pain or any other symptoms related to traction on immediate and intermediate-term follow-up. Joint space width increased, more at the radiocapitellar joint space (Δ = 0.63 mm, p = 0.005) than at the ulnotrochlear joint space (Δ = 0.17 mm, p = 0.012), with contrast dispersion into the radiocapitellar joint and cartilage visibility of the radiocapitellar joint space significantly improving after traction (all p < 0.05). All of these parameters also improved at the ulnotrochlear joint, although this did not reach statistical significance. Traction improved the visibility of cartilage defects. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the effect of traction on MRA of the elbow joint. This technique is safe and technically feasible. Traction MRA improves the cartilage surface visibility and cartilage defect visibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This technique is safe and technically feasible. Traction MRA improves cartilage surface visibility and cartilage defect visibility.
Authors: Daryl C Osbahr; Joshua S Dines; Andrew J Rosenbaum; Joseph T Nguyen; David W Altchek Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Florian Schmaranzer; Andrea Klauser; Michael Kogler; Benjamin Henninger; Thomas Forstner; Markus Reichkendler; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Florian Schmaranzer; Andrea Klauser; Michael Kogler; Benjamin Henninger; Thomas Forstner; Markus Reichkendler; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eva Llopis; Luis Cerezal; Ara Kassarjian; Victoria Higueras; Ernesto Fernandez Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.959