Literature DB >> 30674199

Poor Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography to Detect Hip Chondral Delamination: A Retrospective Follow-Up of 227 FAI-Operated Patients.

George Konstantinidis1, Michael Mitchell2, Gordon Boyd2, Catherine Coady2, Swagata Ghosh3, Ivan Wong2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency and characteristics of acetabular cartilage delamination (CD) in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients and to assess the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in detecting CD based on the radiologist report.
DESIGN: This is a single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients operated for symptomatic FAI. All of the patients had a 1.5-T MR-arthrogram within 12 months preoperatively. MRA reports of these patients were compared with operation notes and surgical videos of all patients by two trained assessors.
RESULTS: At surgery, CD of the acetabulum was present in 169 patients out of a total of 229 patients (74%). Only 6.5% (11 patients) of CD was described on the MRA reports preoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 37.6 ± 13.3 years. The average extent of delamination was 3.12 ± 1.5 cm2 with a mean coronal × sagittal extent of 0.68 × 4.33 cm. There was a significant difference regarding age (P = 0.002), alpha angle from frog view (P = 0.002), and alpha angle from anteroposterior view (P = 0.012) between the patients with delamination and without delamination. The majority of labral tears and cartilage damage were located in the anterosuperior quadrant. MRA sensitivity was 6%, specificity 98%, NPV 27%, and PPV 91% based on the radiologist report.
CONCLUSION: The CD in patients with FAI can be severely underdiagnosed with MRA. There is a need for better standard diagnostic criteria to detect CD in patients with FAI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage delamination; diagnostic value; epidemiology; magnetic resonance arthrography

Year:  2019        PMID: 30674199      PMCID: PMC7970378          DOI: 10.1177/1947603518816453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  34 in total

1.  Surgical images: musculoskeletal acetabular cartilage delamination demonstrated by magnetic resonance arthrography: inverted "Oreo" cookie sign.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Edward J Zaragoza
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Arthroscopy of the hip: factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  Joseph McCarthy; Sean Mc Millan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Hip osteochondral lesions: arthroscopic evaluation.

Authors:  Andrea Fontana; Donato Mancini; Antonello Gironi; Alberto Acerbi
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients.

Authors:  Christian W A Pfirrmann; Bernard Mengiardi; Claudio Dora; Fabian Kalberer; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Cartilage imaging techniques: current clinical applications and state of the art imaging.

Authors:  C B Chung; L R Frank; D Resnick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ana M Crespo-Rodríguez; Jose C De Lucas-Villarrubia; Miguel Pastrana-Ledesma; Ana Hualde-Juvera; Santiago Méndez-Alonso; Mario Padron
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  M Tannast; D Goricki; M Beck; S B Murphy; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography.

Authors:  Marius R Schmid; Hubert P Nötzli; Marco Zanetti; Tobias F Wyss; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography to assess acetabular cartilage delamination.

Authors:  Edward Zaragoza; Pierre-Jean Lattanzio; Paul E Beaule
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Update on imaging in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome].

Authors:  Clemens Felsing; Jörg Schröder
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acetabular Chondral Delamination in Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Guanying Gao; Hanmei Dong; Jianquan Wang; Yingfang Ao; Yan Xu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Arvin B Kheterpal; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.959

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.