Literature DB >> 25463499

High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants.

Nathan T Evans1, F Brennan Torstrick2, Christopher S D Lee3, Kenneth M Dupont4, David L Safranski4, W Allen Chang3, Annie E Macedo5, Angela S P Lin2, Jennifer M Boothby5, Daniel C Whittingslow5, Robert A Carson6, Robert E Guldberg2, Ken Gall7.   

Abstract

Despite its widespread clinical use in load-bearing orthopedic implants, polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is often associated with poor osseointegration. In this study, a surface-porous PEEK material (PEEK-SP) was created using a melt extrusion technique. The porous layer was 399.6±63.3 μm thick and possessed a mean pore size of 279.9±31.6 μm, strut spacing of 186.8±55.5 μm, porosity of 67.3±3.1% and interconnectivity of 99.9±0.1%. Monotonic tensile tests showed that PEEK-SP preserved 73.9% of the strength (71.06±2.17 MPa) and 73.4% of the elastic modulus (2.45±0.31 GPa) of as-received, injection-molded PEEK. PEEK-SP further demonstrated a fatigue strength of 60.0 MPa at one million cycles, preserving 73.4% of the fatigue resistance of injection-molded PEEK. Interfacial shear testing showed the pore layer shear strength to be 23.96±2.26 MPa. An osseointegration model in the rat revealed substantial bone formation within the pore layer at 6 and 12 weeks via microcomputed tomography and histological evaluation. Ingrown bone was more closely apposed to the pore wall and fibrous tissue growth was reduced in PEEK-SP when compared to non-porous PEEK controls. These results indicate that PEEK-SP could provide improved osseointegration while maintaining the structural integrity necessary for load-bearing orthopedic applications.
Copyright © 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fatigue; Orthopedic implant; Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK); Surface porous

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463499      PMCID: PMC4294703          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  44 in total

1.  Microarchitectural and mechanical characterization of oriented porous polymer scaffolds.

Authors:  Angela S P Lin; Thomas H Barrows; Sarah H Cartmell; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Do human osteoblasts grow into open-porous titanium?

Authors:  U Müller; T Imwinkelried; M Horst; M Sievers; U Graf-Hausner
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Rahul Tare; Abhay Andar; Mathis O Riehle; Pawel Herzyk; Chris D W Wilkinson; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-09-23       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Quantitative assessment of scaffold and growth factor-mediated repair of critically sized bone defects.

Authors:  Megan E Oest; Kenneth M Dupont; Hyun-Joon Kong; David J Mooney; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; S Goodman; S Toksvig-Larsen; L Ryd; T Albrektsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-04

6.  Biological response to chopped-carbon-fiber-reinforced peek.

Authors:  K A Jockisch; S A Brown; T W Bauer; K Merritt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1992-02

7.  Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone.

Authors:  Ying Zhao; Hoi Man Wong; Wenhao Wang; Penghui Li; Zushun Xu; Eva Y W Chong; Chun Hoi Yan; Kelvin W K Yeung; Paul K Chu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  Yusuke Arima; Hiroo Iwata
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Nanostructured metal coatings on polymers increase osteoblast attachment.

Authors:  Chang Yao; Dan Storey; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007

10.  Porous surface modified bioactive bone cement for enhanced bone bonding.

Authors:  Qiang He; Huiling Chen; Li Huang; Jingjing Dong; Dagang Guo; Mengmeng Mao; Liang Kong; Yang Li; Zixiang Wu; Wei Lei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  Surface sulfonation and nitrification enhance the biological activity and osteogenesis of polyetheretherketone by forming an irregular nano-porous monolayer.

Authors:  Yanhua Li; Jing Wang; Dong He; Gaoyi Wu; Lei Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices.

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; David L Safranski; J Kenneth Burkus; James L Chappuis; Christopher S D Lee; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall; Kathryn E Smith
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 3.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Interbody Spacer Material Properties and Design Conformity for Reducing Subsidence During Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Lillian S Chatham; Vikas V Patel; Christopher M Yakacki; R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; Nathan T Evans; Hazel Y Stevens; Ken Gall; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Thermal Localization Improves the Interlayer Adhesion and Structural Integrity of 3D printed PEEK Lumbar Spinal Cages.

Authors:  Cemile Basgul; Daniel W MacDonald; Ryan Siskey; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Materialia (Oxf)       Date:  2020-03-09

7.  Biological evaluation and finite-element modeling of porous poly(para-phenylene) for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Hyunhee Ahn; Ravi R Patel; Anthony J Hoyt; Angela S P Lin; F Brennan Torstrick; Robert E Guldberg; Carl P Frick; R Dana Carpenter; Christopher M Yakacki; Nick J Willett
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Modification of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) physical features to improve osteointegration.

Authors:  Dan Yu; Xiaoyue Lei; Huiyong Zhu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter; Brett S Klosterhoff; F Brennan Torstrick; Kevin T Foley; J Kenneth Burkus; Christopher S D Lee; Ken Gall; Robert E Guldberg; David L Safranski
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-04

10.  3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Alejandro Alonso-Calleja; Alexander Kelly; Cambre Kelly; Ken Gall; Jennifer L West
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.