Literature DB >> 32318685

Thermal Localization Improves the Interlayer Adhesion and Structural Integrity of 3D printed PEEK Lumbar Spinal Cages.

Cemile Basgul1, Daniel W MacDonald1, Ryan Siskey1,2, Steven M Kurtz1,2.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a potential application for polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spinal interbody fusion cages, which were introduced as an alternative to titanium cages because of their biocompatibility, radiolucency and strength. However, AM of PEEK is challenging due to high melting temperature and thermal gradient. Although fused filament fabrication (FFF) techniques have been shown to 3D print PEEK, layer delamination was identified in PEEK cages printed with a first generation FFF PEEK printer [1]. A standard cage design [2] was 3D printed with a second generation FFF PEEK printer. The effect of changing layer cooling time on FFF cages' mechanical strength was investigated by varying nozzle sizes (0.2 mm and 0.4 mm), print speeds (1500 and 2500 mm/min), and the number of cages printed in a single build (1, 4 and 8). To calculate the porosity percentage, FFF cages were micro-CT scanned prior to destructive testing. Mechanical tests were then conducted on FFF cages according to ASTM F2077 [2]. Although altering the cooling time of a layer was not able to change the failure mechanism of FFF cages, it was able to improve cages' mechanical strength. Printing a single cage per build caused a higher ultimate load than printing multiple cages per build. Regardless of the cage number printed per build, cages printed with bigger nozzle diameter achieved higher ultimate load compared to cages printed with smaller nozzle diameter. Printing with a bigger nozzle diameter resulted in less porosity, which might have an additional affect on the interlayer delamination failure mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Fused Filament Fabrication; Polyetheretherketone; Spinal Cage

Year:  2020        PMID: 32318685      PMCID: PMC7172383          DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materialia (Oxf)        ISSN: 2589-1529


  18 in total

Review 1.  Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Martelli; Carole Serrano; Hélène van den Brink; Judith Pineau; Patrice Prognon; Isabelle Borget; Salma El Batti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.

Authors:  Sasidhar Vadapalli; Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel; Matt Robon; Ashok Biyani; Ashutosh Khandha; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-10

4.  Engineering Thermoplastics for Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Perspective with Experimental Evidence to Support Functional Applications.

Authors:  Gianluca Cicala; Alberta Latteri; Barbara Del Curto; Alessio Lo Russo; Giuseppe Recca; Silvia Farè
Journal:  J Appl Biomater Funct Mater       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.604

5.  An analysis of fusion cage migration in unilateral and bilateral fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jan William Duncan; Richard Anthony Bailey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Hope versus hype: what can additive manufacturing realistically offer trauma and orthopedic surgery?

Authors:  David M R Gibbs; Mohammad Vaezi; Shoufeng Yang; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices.

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; David L Safranski; J Kenneth Burkus; James L Chappuis; Christopher S D Lee; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall; Kathryn E Smith
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Nathan T Evans; F Brennan Torstrick; Christopher S D Lee; Kenneth M Dupont; David L Safranski; W Allen Chang; Annie E Macedo; Angela S P Lin; Jennifer M Boothby; Daniel C Whittingslow; Robert A Carson; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Strength of PLA Components Fabricated with Fused Deposition Technology Using a Desktop 3D Printer as a Function of Geometrical Parameters of the Process.

Authors:  Vladimir E Kuznetsov; Alexey N Solonin; Oleg D Urzhumtsev; Richard Schilling; Azamat G Tavitov
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.329

View more
  2 in total

1.  Heat Transfer-Based Non-isothermal Healing Model for the Interfacial Bonding Strength of Fused Filament Fabricated Polyetheretherketone.

Authors:  Cemile Basgul; Florian M Thieringer; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Addit Manuf       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  Mechanical strength and shape accuracy optimization of polyamide FFF parts using grey relational analysis.

Authors:  Zohreh Shakeri; Khaled Benfriha; Nader Zirak; Mohammadali Shirinbayan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.