Literature DB >> 29563069

Biological evaluation and finite-element modeling of porous poly(para-phenylene) for orthopaedic implants.

Hyunhee Ahn1, Ravi R Patel2, Anthony J Hoyt3, Angela S P Lin4, F Brennan Torstrick4, Robert E Guldberg4, Carl P Frick3, R Dana Carpenter2, Christopher M Yakacki2, Nick J Willett5.   

Abstract

Poly(para-phenylene) (PPP) is a novel aromatic polymer with higher strength and stiffness than polyetheretherketone (PEEK), the gold standard material for polymeric load-bearing orthopaedic implants. The amorphous structure of PPP makes it relatively straightforward to manufacture different architectures, while maintaining mechanical properties. PPP is promising as a potential orthopaedic material; however, the biocompatibility and osseointegration have not been well investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate biological and mechanical behavior of PPP, with or without porosity, in comparison to PEEK. We examined four specific constructs: 1) solid PPP, 2) solid PEEK, 3) porous PPP and 4) porous PEEK. Pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3) exhibited similar cell proliferation among the materials. Osteogenic potential was significantly increased in the porous PPP scaffold as assessed by ALP activity and calcium mineralization. In vivo osseointegration was assessed by implanting the cylindrical materials into a defect in the metaphysis region of rat tibiae. Significantly more mineral ingrowth was observed in both porous scaffolds compared to the solid scaffolds, and porous PPP had a further increase compared to porous PEEK. Additionally, porous PPP implants showed bone formation throughout the porous structure when observed via histology. A computational simulation of mechanical push-out strength showed approximately 50% higher interfacial strength in the porous PPP implants compared to the porous PEEK implants and similar stress dissipation. These data demonstrate the potential utility of PPP for orthopaedic applications and show improved osseointegration when compared to the currently available polymeric material. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: PEEK has been widely used in orthopaedic surgery; however, the ability to utilize PEEK for advanced fabrication methods, such as 3D printing and tailored porosity, remain challenging. We present a promising new orthopaedic biomaterial, Poly(para-phenylene) (PPP), which is a novel class of aromatic polymers with higher strength and stiffness than polyetheretherketone (PEEK). PPP has exceptional mechanical strength and stiffness due to its repeating aromatic rings that provide strong anti-rotational biaryl bonds. Furthermore, PPP has an amorphous structure making it relatively easier to manufacture (via molding or solvent-casting techniques) into different geometries with and without porosity. This ability to manufacture different architectures and use different processes while maintaining mechanical properties makes PPP a very promising potential orthopaedic biomaterial which may allow for closer matching of mechanical properties between the host bone tissue while also allowing for enhanced osseointegration. In this manuscript, we look at the potential of porous and solid PPP in comparison to PEEK. We measured the mechanical properties of PPP and PEEK scaffolds, tested these scaffolds in vitro for osteocompatibility with MC3T3 cells, and then tested the osseointegration and subsequent functional integration in vivo in a metaphyseal drill hole model in rat tibia. We found that PPP permits cell adhesion, growth, and mineralization in vitro. In vivo it was found that porous PPP significantly enhanced mineralization into the construct and increased the mechanical strength required to push out the scaffold in comparison to PEEK. This is the first study to investigate the performance of PPP as an orthopaedic biomaterial in vivo. PPP is an attractive material for orthopaedic implants due to the ease of manufacturing and superior mechanical strength.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthopaedic biomaterial; Osseointegration; Poly(para-phenylene); Polyetheretherketone; Porous structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29563069      PMCID: PMC5938097          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  35 in total

1.  Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla: ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface.

Authors:  T Futami; N Fujii; H Ohnishi; N Taguchi; H Kusakari; H Ohshima; T Maeda
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Three-dimensional cellular development is essential for ex vivo formation of human bone.

Authors:  S Kale; S Biermann; C Edwards; C Tarnowski; M Morris; M W Long
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants.

Authors:  Tord Berglundh; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Niklaus P Lang; Jan Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 4.  Implant surfaces.

Authors:  David A Puleo; Mark V Thomas
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07

5.  Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.

Authors:  Sasidhar Vadapalli; Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel; Matt Robon; Ashok Biyani; Ashutosh Khandha; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Hung-Tae Chung; Jae-Lim Cho; Dong-Jun Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2013-04

7.  The effect of hydroxyapatite coating on bone growth into porous titanium alloy implants.

Authors:  H Oonishi; M Yamamoto; H Ishimaru; E Tsuji; S Kushitani; M Aono; Y Ukon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-03

8.  A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Masashi Neo; Tomiharu Matsushita; Tadashi Kokubo; Kenji Doi; Tatsuya Ito; Akira Shimizu; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Nathan T Evans; F Brennan Torstrick; Christopher S D Lee; Kenneth M Dupont; David L Safranski; W Allen Chang; Annie E Macedo; Angela S P Lin; Jennifer M Boothby; Daniel C Whittingslow; Robert A Carson; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  The effects of design and positioning of carbon fiber lumbar interbody cages and their subsidence in vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Fred C Lam; Ron Alkalay; Michael W Groff
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Gaseous sulfur trioxide induced controllable sulfonation promoting biomineralization and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone implants.

Authors:  Teng Wan; Zixue Jiao; Min Guo; Zongliang Wang; Yizao Wan; Kaili Lin; Qinyi Liu; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-07-04

2.  Desktop-Stereolithography 3D Printing of a Polyporous Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Bone Defect Regeneration.

Authors:  Yunxiang Luo; Hao Pan; Jiuzhou Jiang; Chenchen Zhao; Jianfeng Zhang; Pengfei Chen; Xianfeng Lin; Shunwu Fan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-06

3.  Early osteointegration evaluation of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface models.

Authors:  Lan Li; Jianping Shi; Kaijia Zhang; Longfei Yang; Fei Yu; Liya Zhu; Huixin Liang; Xingsong Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A novel surgical model for the preclinical assessment of the osseointegration of dental implants: a surgical protocol and pilot study results.

Authors:  Noura M AlOtaibi; Michael Dunne; Ashraf F Ayoub; Kurt B Naudi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.