Literature DB >> 25447784

3.0T, time-resolved, 3D flow-sensitive MR in the thoracic aorta: Impact of k-t BLAST acceleration using 8- versus 32-channel coil arrays.

Arshad Zaman1, Manish Motwani1, James J Oliver1, Gerard Crelier2, Laura E Dobson1, David M Higgins3, Sven Plein1, John P Greenwood1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of 4D flow MR in the thoracic aorta with 8- and 32-channel coil arrays using k-t BLAST and SENSE acceleration techniques and compare this to a conventional 2D SENSE approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects and eight patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0T using: 1) 2D SENSE phase contrast velocity mapping as the reference standard and 2) 4D-flow pulse sequences accelerated with SENSE and k-t BLAST, using both 8- and 32-channel coil arrays. Data processing was performed using GT Flow. Image quality of the magnitude images and pathline visualization were graded and mean scan times, flow, peak velocity, stroke volume, and image quality were compared between techniques.
RESULTS: Mean scan times were significantly lower for 4D-flow sequences accelerated with k-t BLAST compared to SENSE (5.5 vs. 25.2 min; P < 0.01). 4D k-t BLAST acquisition had greater magnitude and pathline image quality than 4D SENSE acquisition for both 32-channel and 8-channel data (P < 0.001); both 4D SENSE and 4D k-t BLAST acquisitions had significantly greater image quality when 32 channels were utilized compared to 8 (P < 0.05). On Bland-Altman analysis, all 4D flow pulse sequences showed significant agreement with the 2D SENSE reference for peak velocity measurement (P > 0.05); the lowest bias being observed with the 4D 32 channel k-t BLAST sequence. There were no significant differences in measured flow, peak velocity, or stroke volume with any of the four investigated 4D acquisition techniques compared to reference technique values (P > 0.05). In patients, there were no significant differences in flow, peak velocity, or stroke volume measurements between 32-channel 4D k-t BLAST and the reference acquisition.
CONCLUSION: 4D flow MR using k-t BLAST and 32 channel coils allows a reduction in total scan time while improving overall image quality compared to a standard 2D SENSE and 4D SENSE acquisitions. The use of 32 channels rather than 8 channels with the 4D k-t BLAST was also preferable in terms of image quality.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D flow; MR; aorta

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447784     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Pim van Ooij; Alex Powell; James Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Alex J Barker; Ryan Scott Dolan; James C Carr; Pim van Ooij; Rouzbeh Ahmadian; Alex Powell; Jeremy D Collins; Julia Geiger; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k-space reordering, and inline reconstruction.

Authors:  Liliana E Ma; Michael Markl; Kelvin Chow; Hyungkyu Huh; Christoph Forman; Alireza Vali; Andreas Greiser; James Carr; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Ning Jin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Advanced flow MRI: emerging techniques and applications.

Authors:  M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  A semiflexible 64-channel receive-only phased array for pediatric body MRI at 3T.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Thomas Grafendorfer; Joseph Y Cheng; Peigang Ning; Bob Rainey; Mark Giancola; Sarah Ortman; Fraser J Robb; Paul D Calderon; Brian A Hargreaves; Michael Lustig; Greig C Scott; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole-heart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jos J M Westenberg; Pieter J van den Boogaard; Peter P Swoboda; Rahoz Aziz; James R J Foley; Graham J Fent; F G J Tyl; L Coratella; Mohammed S M ElBaz; R J van der Geest; David M Higgins; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Accelerated aortic 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing: applicability, validation and clinical integration.

Authors:  Elisabeth Neuhaus; Kilian Weiss; Rene Bastkowski; Jonas Koopmann; David Maintz; Daniel Giese
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Miroslawa Gorecka; Malenka M Bissell; David M Higgins; Pankaj Garg; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.903

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.