Literature DB >> 26100945

Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Georgios Hatzichristodoulou1, Stefan Wagenpfeil2, Gregor Weirich3, Michael Autenrieth4, Tobias Maurer4, Mark Thalgott4, Thomas Horn4, Matthias Heck4, Kathleen Herkommer4, Jürgen E Gschwend4, Hubert Kübler4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intraoperative frozen sections (IFS) of the prostate have demonstrated to be effective in reducing positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR). The aim of this study was to assess partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles (NVB) and report for the first time corresponding functional results.
METHODS: A total of 500 consecutive patients were included in this prospective series. All patients underwent open nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Intraoperatively, both posterolateral aspects of the prostate were sent for IFS. In case of PSM, additional tissue was partly resected from the prostatic bed along the NVB. BCR was the oncologic endpoint (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml). The impact of IFS on PSM and BCR-free survival, and the effect of secondary partial resection of NVB on continence and erectile function (EF) recovery were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were excluded because of neoadjuvant treatment/lymph node positive disease. PSM were detected in 137/471 patients (29.1%). After secondary resection, 127/137 patients (92.7%) converted to definitive negative surgical margins (NSM). Out of 137 patients, ten (7.3%) showed persistent PSM. False-negative rate was 3.3% (11/334). Out of 471 patients, two (0.4%) showed PSM outside the IFS area. Overall, final PSM rate was 4.9% (23/471). Five-year BCR-free survival did not differ significantly in patients with primarily and converted NSM. Continence and EF recovery after 12 months were 95.8 versus 94.3%, and 65.7 versus 56.1%, respectively (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: IFS are highly effective in reducing PSM and avoiding compromised oncologic outcome. Partial secondary resection of the NVB ensures ns status and consequently preserves continence and EF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; Continence; Erectile function; Frozen section; Radical prostatectomy; Surgical margins

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100945     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1623-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

Review 1.  Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Daniel A Bloch; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden; April E Hebert; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Thomas E Ahlering; Anthony Costello; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Mani Menon; Alexandre Mottrie; Vipul R Patel; Henk Van der Poel; Raymond C Rosen; Ashutosh K Tewari; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.

Authors:  Nazareno Suardi; Marco Moschini; Andrea Gallina; Giorgio Gandaglia; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Marco Bianchi; Manuela Tutolo; Niccolò Passoni; Andrea Salonia; Petter Hedlund; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The natural course of pT2 prostate cancer with positive surgical margin: predicting biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  A Karl; A Buchner; C Tympner; T Kirchner; U Ganswindt; C Belka; R Ganzer; M Burger; F Eder; F Hofstädter; D Schilling; K Sievert; A Stenzl; M Scharpf; F Fend; F Vom Dorp; H Rübben; K Schmid; D Porres-Knoblauch; A Heidenreich; B Hangarter; R Knüchel-Clarke; M Rogenhofer; B Wullich; A Hartmann; E Comploj; A Pycha; E Hanspeter; D Pehrke; G Sauter; M Graefen; C Stief; A Haese
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Reza Z Goharderakhshan; Daniel Sudilovsky; Lauren A Carroll; Gary D Grossfeld; Richard Marn; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karl Pummer; Malte Rieken; Herbert Augustin; Thomas Gutschi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients.

Authors:  A I Tasci; I Tufek; E Gumus; A E Canda; V Tugcu; F Atug; U Boylu; Z Akbulut; S Sahin; A Simsek; A R Kural
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Anders Bjartell; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Rodolfo Montironi; Franceso Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.