Literature DB >> 27738805

Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Hakmin Lee1, Chan Kyo Kim2, Byung Kwan Park2, Hyun Hwan Sung1, Deok Hyun Han1, Hwang Gyun Jeon1, Byong Chang Jeong1, Seong Il Seo1, Seong Soo Jeon1, Han Yong Choi1, Hyun Moo Lee3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for preoperative staging and its influence on the determination of neurovascular bundle sparing and disease prognosis in patients with localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: We reviewed 1045 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with preoperative mpMRI at a single institution. Clinical local stages determined from mpMRI were correlated with preoperative and postoperative pathological outcomes.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity to diagnose seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) on mpMRI were 43.8 and 95.4 %, respectively. The negative predictive value was 78.9 %. The sensitivity and specificity to diagnose extracapsular extension (ECE) were 54.5 and 80.5 %, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing pathological T3 or higher were 52.6 and 82.1 %, respectively. Non-organ-confined disease determined by mpMRI was significantly associated with positive surgical margin and pathological T3 disease on multivariate analysis. Preoperative adverse findings on mpMRI were significantly associated with performance of the non-nerve-sparing technique.
CONCLUSION: mpMRI did not show outstanding diagnostic accuracy relative to our expectations in predicting SVI or ECE preoperatively. However, adverse findings on preoperative mpMRI were significantly related to worse postoperative pathological outcomes as well as postoperative biochemical recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; MRI; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Survival; mpMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27738805     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1948-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  16 in total

1.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for clinically high risk prostate cancer in 922 radical prostatectomies.

Authors:  In Gab Jeong; Ju Hyun Lim; Dalsan You; Mi-Hyun Kim; Hyuk Jae Choi; Jeong Kon Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Marc A Bjurlin; Joseph Nicholson; Teuvo L Tammela; David F Penson; H Ballentine Carter; Peter Carroll; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Linda M Johnson; Baris Turkbey; William D Figg; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Alberto Briganti; Pieter De Visschere; Mark Emberton; Gianluca Giannarini; Alex Kirkham; Samir S Taneja; Harriet Thoeny; Geert Villeirs; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Monique J Roobol; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Visualization of prostate cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with transrectal power Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  H Ito; K Kamoi; K Yokoyama; K Yamada; T Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten de Rooij; Esther H J Hamoen; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The role of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard Johnston; Lih-Ming Wong; Anne Warren; Nimish Shah; David Neal
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [MRI of the prostate].

Authors:  D Nörenberg; O Solyanik; B Schlenker; G Magistro; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; M F Reiser; M D'Anastasi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Imaging of locally advanced prostate cancer : Importance of ultrasound and especially MRI].

Authors:  O Solyanik; B Schlenker; C Gratzke; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; J Ricke; D Nörenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Chen-Lu Liu; Qian Chen; Sheng-Chao Shao; Shuang-Qing Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Clinical utility of MRI in the decision-making process before radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mieszko Kozikowski; Wojciech Malewski; Wojciech Michalak; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  External Validation and Comparison of Two Nomograms Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Patients subjected to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Concomitant Lymph Node Dissection: A Single Tertiary Center Experience in the MRI-Era.

Authors:  Nicola Frego; Marco Paciotti; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Davide Maffei; Roberto Contieri; Pier Paolo Avolio; Vittorio Fasulo; Alessandro Uleri; Massimo Lazzeri; Rodolfo Hurle; Alberto Saita; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni; Paolo Casale; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 6.  Current Opinion on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jamie Michael; Kevin Neuzil; Ersan Altun; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Prognostic value of seminal vesicle invasion on preoperative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in pathological stage T3b prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.