Literature DB >> 29492583

Validation of the current eligibility criteria for focal therapy in men with localized prostate cancer and the role of MRI.

Raisa S Pompe1,2, Bieke Kühn-Thomä1, Yamini Nagaraj1, Valia Veleva1, Felix Preisser1, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah1,2, Markus Graefen1, Hartwig Huland1, Derya Tilki1,2, Georg Salomon3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate current eligibility criteria for focal therapy (FT) in prostate cancer men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 217 RP patients (2009-2016) with preoperative MRI (almost all in external institutions) and fulfillment of different FT eligibility criteria: unilateral tumor, clinical tumor stage ≤ cT2a, prostate volume ≤ 60 mL and either biopsy Gleason 3 + 3 or ≤ 3 + 4 and PSA ≤ 10 or ≤ 15 ng/mL. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) assessed the role of MRI to predict the presence of significant contralateral tumor or extracapsular extension (ECE), including seminal vesicle invasion. To quantify model accuracy, Receiver Operating Characteristics-derived area under the curve (AUC) was used.
RESULTS: Of 217 patients fulfilling widest biopsy criteria and 113 fulfilling additional MRI criteria, 64 (29.7%) and 37 (32.7%) remained eligible for FT according to histopathological results. In MVA, fulfillment of MRI criteria reached independent predictor status for prediction of contralateral tumor but not for ECE. Addition of MRI resulted in AUC gain (57.5-64.6%). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for MRI to predict contralateral tumor were: 41.8, 71.6, 70.9 and 42.6%, respectively. Virtually the same results were recorded for Gleason 3 + 3 and/or PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient eligibility criteria for FT using biopsy criteria remained insufficient with respect to contralateral tumor disease. Although, MRI improves accuracy, it cannot safely exclude or minimize chance of significant cancer on contralateral prostate side. To date, stricter eligibility criteria are needed to provide more diagnostic reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focal therapy; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29492583     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2238-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  34 in total

1.  Poor standard mp-MRI and routine biopsy fail to precisely predict intraprostatic tumor localization.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Will focal therapy remain only an attractive illusion for the primary treatment of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Gianluca Giannarini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Gallina; Carmen Maccagnano; Nazareno Suardi; Umberto Capitanio; Firas Abdollah; Marco Raber; Andrea Salonia; Vincenzo Scattoni; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Alphaeus M Wise; Thomas A Stamey; John E McNeal; John L Clayton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Matthew Miessau; David G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Primary Cryotherapy for High-Grade Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes from the COLD Registry.

Authors:  Kae Jack Tay; Thomas J Polascik; Ahmed Elshafei; Michael L Cher; Robert W Given; Vladimir Mouraviev; Ashley E Ross; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Thorsten Schlomm; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Masahiro Yashi; Akinori Nukui; Yuumi Tokura; Kohei Takei; Issei Suzuki; Kazumasa Sakamoto; Hideo Yuki; Tsunehito Kambara; Hironori Betsunoh; Hideyuki Abe; Yoshitatsu Fukabori; Yoshimasa Nakazato; Yasushi Kaji; Takao Kamai
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Sari Laitinen; Sofia Khan; Mauno Vihinen; Jeanne Kowalski; Guoqiang Yu; Li Chen; Charles M Ewing; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Yue Wang; Jianfeng Xu; William B Isaacs; Tapio Visakorpi; G Steven Bova
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  2 in total

1.  Standards, innovations, and controversies in urologic imaging.

Authors:  Pat Fox Fulgham; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Soleen Ghafoor; Daniel Stocker; Olivio F Donati; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Anton S Becker; Borna K Barth; Daniel Eberli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.