Literature DB >> 25421216

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture.

M B F Jensen1, K E P Olsen, X C Nielsen, A M Hoegh, R B Dessau, T Atlung, J Engberg.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) requires the detection of toxigenic C. difficile or its toxins and a clinical assessment. We evaluated the performance of four nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) detecting toxigenic C. difficile directly from faeces compared to routine toxigenic culture. In total, 300 faecal samples from Danish hospitalised patients with diarrhoea were included consecutively. Culture was performed in duplicate (routine and 'expanded toxigenic culture': prolonged and/or re-culture) and genotypic toxin profiling by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), PCR ribotyping and toxinotyping (TT) were performed on culture-positive samples. In parallel, the samples were analysed by four NAATs; two targeting tcdA or tcdB (illumigene C. difficile and PCRFast C. difficile A/B) and two multi-target real-time (RT) PCR assays also targeting cdt and tcdC alleles characteristic of epidemic and potentially more virulent PCR ribotypes 027, 066 and 078 (GeneXpert C. difficile/Epi and an 'in-house RT PCR' two-step algorithm). The multi-target assays were significantly more sensitive compared to routine toxigenic culture (p < 0.05) and significantly more robust to inhibition compared to PCRFast (p < 0.001). Duplicate 'expanded toxigenic culture' increased the culture-positive rate by 29% compared to routine culture. The ability of the GeneXpert and in-house assays to correctly classify PCR ribotype 027 was high (>95%), and in-house PCR displayed 100% correct identification of PCR ribotypes 066 and 078. Furthermore, the presence of the PCR enhancer bovine serum albumin (BSA) was found to be related to high sensitivity and low inhibition rate. Rapid laboratory diagnosis of toxigenic C. difficile by RT PCR was accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25421216     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2284-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  46 in total

1.  Mortality attributable to nosocomial Clostridium difficile-associated disease during an epidemic caused by a hypervirulent strain in Quebec.

Authors:  Jacques Pépin; Louis Valiquette; Benoit Cossette
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Evaluation of a rapid molecular screening approach for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in general and subsequent identification of the tcdC Δ117 mutation in human stools.

Authors:  R F de Boer; J J Wijma; T Schuurman; J Moedt; B G Dijk-Alberts; A Ott; A M D Kooistra-Smid; Y T H P van Duynhoven
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  What is the current role of algorithmic approaches for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Mark H Wilcox; Tim Planche; Ferric C Fang; Peter Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model.

Authors:  L Monteiro; D Bonnemaison; A Vekris; K G Petry; J Bonnet; R Vidal; J Cabrita; F Mégraud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Susan Novak-Weekley; Christopher W Woods; Lance R Peterson; Thomas Davis; Paul Schreckenberger; Ferric C Fang; Andre Dascal; Dale N Gerding; Jim H Nomura; Richard V Goering; Thomas Akerlund; Alice S Weissfeld; Ellen Jo Baron; Edith Wong; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Joseph Whitmore; David H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Lack of association of tcdC type and binary toxin status with disease severity and outcome in toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Simon D Goldenberg; Gary L French
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.072

7.  A systematic evaluation of methods to optimize culture-based recovery of Clostridium difficile from stool specimens.

Authors:  Tiffany Hink; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.331

8.  Update of Clostridium difficile infection due to PCR ribotype 027 in Europe, 2008.

Authors:  E J Kuijper; F Barbut; J S Brazier; N Kleinkauf; T Eckmanns; M L Lambert; D Drudy; F Fitzpatrick; C Wiuff; D J Brown; J E Coia; H Pituch; P Reichert; J Even; J Mossong; A F Widmer; K E Olsen; F Allerberger; D W Notermans; M Delmée; B Coignard; M Wilcox; B Patel; R Frei; E Nagy; E Bouza; M Marin; T Akerlund; A Virolainen-Julkunen; O Lyytikäinen; S Kotila; A Ingebretsen; B Smyth; P Rooney; I R Poxton; D L Monnet
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2008-07-31

9.  A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates.

Authors:  M Rupnik; V Avesani; M Janc; C von Eichel-Streiber; M Delmée
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Binary toxin and death after Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Sabrina Bacci; Kåre Mølbak; Marianne K Kjeldsen; Katharina E P Olsen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  9 in total

1.  Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces of Asymptomatic Patients Admitted to the Hospital.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Terveer; Monique J T Crobach; Ingrid M J G Sanders; Margreet C Vos; Cees M Verduin; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Hanjiang Lai; Chen Huang; Jian Cai; Julian Ye; Jun She; Yi Zheng; Liqian Wang; Yelin Wei; Weijia Fang; Xianjun Wang; Yi-Wei Tang; Yun Luo; Dazhi Jin
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Diagnostic test accuracy of glutamate dehydrogenase for Clostridium difficile: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Arimoto; Nobuyuki Horita; Shingo Kato; Akiko Fuyuki; Takuma Higurashi; Hidenori Ohkubo; Hiroki Endo; Nonaka Takashi; Takeshi Kaneko; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  BaiCD gene cluster abundance is negatively correlated with Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Philipp Solbach; Patrick Chhatwal; Sabrina Woltemate; Evelina Tacconelli; Michael Buhl; Markus Gerhard; Christoph K Thoeringer; Maria J G T Vehreschild; Nathalie Jazmati; Jan Rupp; Michael P Manns; Oliver Bachmann; Sebastian Suerbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection: the First Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Korea.

Authors:  Hae-Sun Chung; Jeong Su Park; Bo-Moon Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile diagnostic assay: an update meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Bai; Yingying Hao; Zhen Song; Wenjun Chu; Yan Jin; Yueling Wang
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 2.476

8.  Evaluation of Xpert C. difficile, BD MAX Cdiff, IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000, and Illumigene C. difficile Assays for Direct Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Specimens.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Sun Mee Yoo; Won Chang Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Accuracy of Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: A meta analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Bai; Xiaorong Sun; Yan Jin; Yueling Wang; Juan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.