Literature DB >> 20674616

Evaluation of a rapid molecular screening approach for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in general and subsequent identification of the tcdC Δ117 mutation in human stools.

R F de Boer1, J J Wijma, T Schuurman, J Moedt, B G Dijk-Alberts, A Ott, A M D Kooistra-Smid, Y T H P van Duynhoven.   

Abstract

We have developed and validated a rapid molecular screening protocol for toxigenic Clostridium difficile, that also enables the identification of the hypervirulent epidemic 027/NAP1 strain. We describe a multiplex real-time PCR assay, which detects the presence of the tcdA and tcdB genes directly in stool samples. In case of positive PCR results, a separate multiplex real-time PCR typing assay was performed targeting the tcdC gene frame shift mutation at position 117. We prospectively compared the results of the screening PCR with those of a cytotoxicity assay (CTA), and a rapid immuno-enzyme assay for 161 stool samples with a specific request for diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). A total of 16 stool samples were positive by CTA. The screening PCR assay confirmed all 16 samples, and gave a PCR positive signal in eight additional samples. The typing PCR assay detected the tcdC Δ117 mutation in 2/24 samples suggesting the presence of the epidemic strain in these samples. This was confirmed by PCR ribotyping and sequencing of the tcdC gene. Using CTA as the "gold standard", the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, for the screening PCR were 100%, 94.4%, 66.7%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, PCR may serve as a rapid negative screening assay for patients suspected of having CDI, although the low PPV hamper the use of PCR as a standalone test. However, PCR results may provide valuable information for patient management and minimising the spread of the epidemic 027/NAP1 strain.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674616     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  15 in total

1.  A multiplex, internally controlled real-time PCR assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and identification of hypervirulent strain 027/ST-1.

Authors:  A M Hoegh; J B Nielsen; A Lester; A Friis-Møller; K Schønning
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Routine disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Clostridium difficile and association with PCR ribotype 027.

Authors:  H M Holt; T K Danielsen; U S Justesen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Etiology of acute gastroenteritis in children requiring hospitalization in the Netherlands.

Authors:  I H M Friesema; R F de Boer; E Duizer; L M Kortbeek; D W Notermans; O F Norbruis; D D L Bezemer; H van Heerbeek; R N J van Andel; J G van Enk; P L A Fraaij; M P G Koopmans; A M D Kooistra-Smid; Y T H P van Duynhoven
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

6.  Comparison of real-time PCR techniques to cytotoxigenic culture methods for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  C W Knetsch; D Bakker; R F de Boer; I Sanders; S Hofs; A M D Kooistra-Smid; J Corver; K Eastwood; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture.

Authors:  M B F Jensen; K E P Olsen; X C Nielsen; A M Hoegh; R B Dessau; T Atlung; J Engberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Multiplex PCR method for detection of Clostridium difficile tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, and cdtB and internal in-frame deletion of tcdC.

Authors:  Søren Persson; Joan N Jensen; Katharina E P Olsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Premarket evaluations of the IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000 Assay and the BD Max Cdiff Assay.

Authors:  K A Stellrecht; A A Espino; V P Maceira; S M Nattanmai; S A Butt; D Wroblewski; G E Hannett; K A Musser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.