Literature DB >> 29058256

Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens.

Hanjiang Lai1, Chen Huang2, Jian Cai3, Julian Ye2, Jun She1, Yi Zheng4, Liqian Wang5, Yelin Wei1, Weijia Fang4, Xianjun Wang5, Yi-Wei Tang6,7, Yun Luo8, Dazhi Jin9.   

Abstract

We employed a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with capillary electrophoresis (mPCR-CE) targeting six Clostridium difficile genes, including tpi, tcdA, tcdB, cdtA, cdtB, and a deletion in tcdC for simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic C. difficile directly from fecal specimens. The mPCR-CE had a limit of detection of 10 colony-forming units per reaction with no cross-reactions with other related bacterial genes. Clinical validation was performed on 354 consecutively collected stool specimens from patients with suspected C. difficile infection and 45 isolates. The results were compared with a reference standard combined with BD MAX Cdiff, real-time cell analysis assay (RTCA), and mPCR-CE. The toxigenic C. difficile species were detected in 36 isolates and 45 stool specimens by the mPCR-CE, which provided a positive rate of 20.3% (81/399). The mPCR-CE had a specificity of 97.2% and a sensitivity of 96.0%, which was higher than RTCA (x2 = 5.67, P = 0.017) but lower than BD MAX Cdiff (P = 0.245). Among the 45 strains, 44 (97.8%) were determined as nonribotype 027 by the mPCR-CE, which was fully agreed with PCR ribotyping. Even though ribotypes 017 (n = 8, 17.8%), 001 (n = 6, 13.3%), and 012 (n = 7, 15.6%) were predominant in this region, ribotype 027 was an important genotype monitored routinely. The mPCR-CE provided an alternative diagnosis tool for the simultaneous detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and potentially differentiated between RT027 and non-RT027.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; capillary electrophoresis; characterization; detection; multiplex PCR

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29058256      PMCID: PMC6750768          DOI: 10.1007/s11684-017-0560-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   4.592


  62 in total

Review 1.  A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene.

Authors:  Susannah G Tringe; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Real-time cellular analysis coupled with a specimen enrichment accurately detects and quantifies Clostridium difficile toxins in stool.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Dazhi Jin; Jing Zhang; Janet Y Sun; Xiaobo Wang; Jeffrey Stiles; Xiao Xu; Mini Kamboj; N Esther Babady; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the Verigene Clostridium difficile, Simplexa C. difficile Universal Direct, BD MAX Cdiff, and Xpert C. difficile assays for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile.

Authors:  Jeremy J Gilbreath; Punam Verma; April N Abbott; Susan M Butler-Wu
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Clinical characterization and risk factors of Clostridium difficile infection in elderly patients in a Chinese hospital.

Authors:  Zhang Lihua; Dong Danfeng; Jiang Cen; Wang Xuefeng; Peng Yibing
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Molecular Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients in Eastern China.

Authors:  Dazhi Jin; Yun Luo; Chen Huang; Jian Cai; Julian Ye; Yi Zheng; Liqian Wang; Peng Zhao; Anbing Liu; Weijia Fang; Xianjun Wang; Shichang Xia; Jianmin Jiang; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of Illumigene, Simplexa, and AmpliVue Clostridium difficile molecular assays for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

Authors:  E Deak; S A Miller; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Roberta A Dickenson; Fongman Wu; Sarah B Andrea
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Blake W Buchan; Sokha Tan; Paul D Stamper; Katherine M Riebe; Preeti Pancholi; Cheryl Kelly; Arundhati Rao; Robert Fader; Robert Cavagnolo; Wendy Watson; Richard V Goering; Ernest A Trevino; Alice S Weissfeld; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins from stool samples using real-time multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Ann Pallis; Jalal Jazayeri; Peter Ward; Karolina Dimovski; Suzanne Svobodova
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  The First Two Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027/ST1 Isolates Identified in Beijing, China-an Emerging Problem or a Neglected Threat?

Authors:  Jing-Wei Cheng; Meng Xiao; Timothy Kudinha; Zhi-Peng Xu; Xin Hou; Lin-Ying Sun; Li Zhang; Xin Fan; Fanrong Kong; Ying-Chun Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Three Immunoassays for the Simultaneous Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B.

Authors:  Namsu Kim; Seung Yeob Lee; Joonhong Park; Jaehyeon Lee
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Loop mediated isothermal amplification of Clostridioides difficile isolates in gastrointestinal patients.

Authors:  Mojtaba Moosavian; Razieyeh Keshavarzi; Effat Abbasi Montazeri; Eskandar Hajiani
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.298

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.