Literature DB >> 25415726

CT colonography for the detection of nonpolypoid adenomas: sensitivity assessed with restricted national CT colonography trial criteria.

Jeff L Fidler1, Zheng Zhang, Benjamin A Herman, Paul J Limburg, J G Fletcher, Abraham Dachman, Jay P Heiken, Mark D Kuo, Christine O Menias, Bettina Siewert, Jugesh I Cheema, Richard G Obregon, Peter Zimmerman, Karen M Horton, Kevin Coakley, Revathy B Iyer, Amy Hara, Robert A Halvorsen, Giovanna Casola, Judy Yee, Lawrence J Burgart, C Daniel Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of nonpolypoid adenomas and the sensitivity of CT colonography (CTC) in their detection by use of the restricted criteria of height-to-width ratio<50% and height elevation≤3 mm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the National CT Colonography Trial (American College of Radiology Imaging Network protocol 6664), a cohort of 2531 participants without symptoms underwent CTC and screening colonoscopy. The CTC examinations were interpreted with both 2D and 3D techniques. Nonpolypoid adenomatous polyps identified with CTC or colonoscopy were retrospectively reviewed to determine which polyps met the restricted criteria. The prevalence of nonpolypoid adenomas and the prospective sensitivity of CTC were determined. Descriptive statistics were used to report the prevalence, size, and histologic features. The sensitivities (with 95% CIs) for nonpolypoid and polypoid lesions were compared by two-sided Z test for independent binomial proportions.
RESULTS: The retrospective review confirmed 21 nonpolypoid adenomas, yielding a prevalence of 0.83% (21 of 2531 participants). Eight (38.1%) were advanced adenomas, many (50% [4/8]) only because of large size (≥10 mm). The overall per polyp sensitivity of CTC (combined 2D and 3D interpretation) for detecting nonpolypoid adenomas≥5 mm (n=21) was 0.76; ≥6 mm (n=16), 0.75; and ≥10 mm (n=5), 0.80. These values were not statistically different from the sensitivity of detecting polypoid adenomas (p>0.37).
CONCLUSION: In this large screening population, nonpolypoid adenomas had a very low prevalence (<1%), and advanced pathologic features were uncommon in polyps<10 mm in diameter. Most nonpolypoid adenomas are technically visible at CTC. The prospective sensitivity is similar to that for polypoid adenomas when the interpretation combines both 2D and 3D review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT colonography; colon cancer; nonpolypoid adenoma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25415726      PMCID: PMC4312488          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  42 in total

1.  Flat adenomas.

Authors:  A Cairns; P Quirke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Flat-elevated and depressed, subtypes of flat early colorectal cancers, should be distinguished by their pathological features.

Authors:  M Sakashita; N Aoyama; S Maekawa; K Kuroda; D Shirasaka; T Ichihara; Y Kuroda; R Minami; S Maeda; M Kasuga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Flat colorectal neoplasms: definition, importance, and visualization on CT colonography.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Seung Soo Lee; Eugene K Choi; So Yeon Kim; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin Ho Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M von Bergh; M Hahn; G Hermann; M Jung
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population.

Authors:  Y Saitoh; I Waxman; A B West; N K Popnikolov; Z Gatalica; J Watari; T Obara; Y Kohgo; P J Pasricha
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study.

Authors:  S Tsuda; B Veress; E Tóth; F-T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography.

Authors:  J L Fidler; C D Johnson; R L MacCarty; T J Welch; A K Hara; W S Harmsen
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2002 May-Jun

9.  Flat and depressed lesions of the colon and rectum: Pathogenesis and clinical management.

Authors:  K Togashi; F Konishi; K Koinuma; T Ishitsuka; M Kojima; M Okada; H Nagai
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  David P Hurlstone; Simon S Cross; Ian Adam; Andrew J Shorthouse; Steven Brown; David S Sanders; Alan J Lobo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Familial colorectal cancer screening: When and what to do?

Authors:  Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Omero Alessandro Paoluzi; Pierpaolo Sileri; Piero Rossi; Giuseppe Sica; Francesco Pallone
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.