INTRODUCTION: It is not clear whether flat lesions play a role in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma. Flat lesions are being increasingly recognised with new colonoscopic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10,939 consecutive colonoscopies were performed over a 9-year period. After bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution, high-resolution video colonoscopy and indigocarmine spraying were performed to detect flat lesions. All lesions suggesting neoplastic change were removed by polypectomy or surgery. Cancers invading beyond the submucosal layer were excluded from this analysis. The gross appearance of flat-type lesions was classified as flat elevated type or flat depressed type based on the presence or absence of central depression. RESULTS: A total of 5408 neoplastic lesions were index lesions, including 5035 adenomas and 373 carcinomas (124 with submucosal invasion). The prevalence of flat depressed and flat elevated lesions were 2.8% and 18.1%, respectively. Submucosal invasion rates were 17.1% in the flat depressed, 0.8% in the flat elevated, 1.6% in the sessile, 4.0% in pedunculated lesions and 9.3% in creeping lesions. The submucosal invasion rate in the flat depressed lesions was significantly higher than in any others, except for creeping lesions (P = 0.06). The percentage of flat elevated and flat depressed carcinomas among all carcinomas invading the submucosa was 6.5% and 21.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Flat lesions were common during routine colonoscopy. One-quarter of colorectal cancers may be derived from flat lesions. Training in dye spray technique may result in a higher detection rate of flat colonic lesions.
INTRODUCTION: It is not clear whether flat lesions play a role in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma. Flat lesions are being increasingly recognised with new colonoscopic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10,939 consecutive colonoscopies were performed over a 9-year period. After bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution, high-resolution video colonoscopy and indigocarmine spraying were performed to detect flat lesions. All lesions suggesting neoplastic change were removed by polypectomy or surgery. Cancers invading beyond the submucosal layer were excluded from this analysis. The gross appearance of flat-type lesions was classified as flat elevated type or flat depressed type based on the presence or absence of central depression. RESULTS: A total of 5408 neoplastic lesions were index lesions, including 5035 adenomas and 373 carcinomas (124 with submucosal invasion). The prevalence of flat depressed and flat elevated lesions were 2.8% and 18.1%, respectively. Submucosal invasion rates were 17.1% in the flat depressed, 0.8% in the flat elevated, 1.6% in the sessile, 4.0% in pedunculated lesions and 9.3% in creeping lesions. The submucosal invasion rate in the flat depressed lesions was significantly higher than in any others, except for creeping lesions (P = 0.06). The percentage of flat elevated and flat depressed carcinomas among all carcinomas invading the submucosa was 6.5% and 21.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Flat lesions were common during routine colonoscopy. One-quarter of colorectal cancers may be derived from flat lesions. Training in dye spray technique may result in a higher detection rate of flat colonic lesions.
Authors: Sharon J Miller; Cameron M Lee; Bishnu P Joshi; Adam Gaustad; Eric J Seibel; Thomas D Wang Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Giuseppe Giuffrè; Annegret Müller; Thomas Brodegger; Tina Bocker-Edmonston; Johannes Gebert; Matthias Kloor; Wolfgang Dietmaier; Frank Kullmann; Reinhard Büttner; Giovanni Tuccari; Josef Rüschoff Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Jeff L Fidler; Zheng Zhang; Benjamin A Herman; Paul J Limburg; J G Fletcher; Abraham Dachman; Jay P Heiken; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Bettina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Lawrence J Burgart; C Daniel Johnson Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Quirinus J M Voorham; Beatriz Carvalho; Angela J Spiertz; Bart Claes; Sandra Mongera; Nicole C T van Grieken; Heike Grabsch; Martin Kliment; Bjorn Rembacken; Mark A van de Wiel; Philip Quirke; Chris J J Mulder; Diether Lambrechts; Manon van Engeland; Gerrit A Meijer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240