Literature DB >> 14638361

A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom.

David P Hurlstone1, Simon S Cross, Ian Adam, Andrew J Shorthouse, Steven Brown, David S Sanders, Alan J Lobo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Flat and depressed colorectal lesions are now reported in Western populations. The malignant potential, anatomical distribution, and other clinicopathological features have not been established in this group. This study aimed to assess prospectively the prevalence, clinicopathological, and endoscopic features of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: A single endoscopist performed colonoscopy on 850 consecutive patients presenting for routine colonoscopy. All endoscopies were performed using a high magnification colonoscope with chromoscopy to facilitate detection of flat and depressed colorectal lesions.
RESULTS: A total of 458 flat lesions were identified. Of these, 173 (38%) were hyperplastic and 285 (62%) adenomatous or beyond. Of the 173 hyperplastic flat lesions, 162 (94%) were located in the recto-sigmoid region. Of the 267 adenomas, 66 (25%) had areas of high grade dysplasia (HGD), with 54/66 (82%) being present in the right colon. Flat lesions <8 mm in diameter was more likely to contain HGD than those <8 mm (p<0.001). Nine of the 10 (90%) flat invasive adenoacarcinomas were in the right colon and all had a depressed morphological component. In contrast, HGD was observed in 58/466 (12%) of protuberant (sessile/pedunculated) adenomas of which 95% (55/58) were located in the left colon. In addition, HGD was present in 17% of all sessile adenomas versus 44.6% of flat lesions >8 mm in diameter (p=0.001). Of the 14 protuberant carcinomas, 13/14 (93%) were in the left colon. Synchronous lesions were found in 96/816 (12%) of cases. Of the 816 patients with two or more left-sided protuberant adenomas <8 mm (with or without HGD), 89 (11%) had one or more flat lesions in the right colon with HGD.
CONCLUSIONS: Flat adenomas and carcinomas have a high malignant potential compared to protuberant lesions and have a propensity for developing in the right hemi-colon. Total colonoscopy is required to detect such lesions, as only 18% of flat lesions would be in reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14638361     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07679.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  39 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection: an evolving therapeutic strategy for non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M F Neurath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Should we remove all lesions at colonoscopy?

Authors:  B Rembacken
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy or high frequency 20 MHz mini probe endoscopic ultrasound staging for early colorectal neoplasia: a comparative prospective analysis.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S Brown; S S Cross; A J Shorthouse; D S Sanders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Magnifying colonoscopy: interobserver agreement in the assessment of colonic pit patterns and its correlation with histopathological findings.

Authors:  Esdras Camargo Andrade Zanoni; Raul Cutait; Marcelo Averbach; Lix Alfredo Reis de Oliveira; Cláudio Rolim Teixeira; Paulo Alberto Falco Pires Corrêa; José Luiz Paccos; Giulio F Rossini; Luiz H Câmara Lopes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Ji-young Yun; Hee Jeong Ro; Jong Beom Park; Jung-Bin Choi; Ji Eun Chung; Yong Jin Kim; Won Hyuck Suh; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  CT colonography and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; James E East; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Polyp morphology: an interobserver evaluation for the Paris classification among international experts.

Authors:  Sascha C van Doorn; Y Hazewinkel; James E East; Monique E van Leerdam; Amit Rastogi; Maria Pellisé; Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu; Barbara A J Bastiaansen; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Microsatellite analysis of sporadic flat and depressed lesions of the colon.

Authors:  Timothy P Kinney; Nina Merel; John Hart; Loren Joseph; Irving Waxman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Polyp surveillance.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

Review 10.  Novel colorectal endoscopic in vivo imaging and resection practice: a short practice guide for interventional endoscopists.

Authors:  R J Atkinson; A J Shorthouse; D P Hurlstone
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.