Literature DB >> 11375947

Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population.

Y Saitoh1, I Waxman, A B West, N K Popnikolov, Z Gatalica, J Watari, T Obara, Y Kohgo, P J Pasricha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To assess the prevalence of flat and depressed (F&D) colorectal adenomas in the United States, we performed a prospective study of 211 American patients.
METHODS: Dye-assisted colonoscopy was performed in the presence of both an American and a Japanese investigator.
RESULTS: F&amp;D lesions were found in 22.7% of patients, and these were more likely to be adenomatous than polypoid lesions (82% vs. 67%; P = 0.03) and contained more invasive cancer (4.5% vs. 0%; P = 0.04), which also appeared to be at a disproportionately advanced stage. The average size of all F&amp;D advanced lesions (high-grade dysplasia and cancer) was significantly smaller than comparable polypoid lesions (10.75 +/- 2.7 mm vs. 20 +/- 2.9 mm; P < 0.05). F&amp;D adenomas showed significantly stronger fragile histidine triad (FHIT) expression and lower p53 reactivity than similarly sized polypoid adenomas, whereas proliferative and apoptotic indices were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is a significant prevalence of colonic F&amp;D colorectal adenomas in this country and that these lesions have significantly different biologic features than polypoid lesions. The clinical and epidemiologic implications of these findings for American patients need to be addressed in further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11375947     DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.24886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  65 in total

Review 1.  [Conventional and virtual colonoscopy].

Authors:  C Ell; T Rabenstein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy as a screening tool in acromegaly.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S S Cross; A J Lobo; D S Sanders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Surveillance colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis: magnifying chromoendoscopy in the spotlight.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M F Neurath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Endoscopic mucosal resection: an evolving therapeutic strategy for non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M F Neurath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Should we remove all lesions at colonoscopy?

Authors:  B Rembacken
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study.

Authors:  S Tsuda; B Veress; E Tóth; F-T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  Microsatellite analysis of sporadic flat and depressed lesions of the colon.

Authors:  Timothy P Kinney; Nina Merel; John Hart; Loren Joseph; Irving Waxman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Expression of doublecortin and CaM kinase-like-1 protein in serrated neoplasia of the colorectum.

Authors:  Keiko Morio; Kazuo Yashima; Akihiro Tamoto; Kohei Hosoda; Sohei Yamamoto; Taku Iwamoto; Naoki Ueda; Yuichiro Ikebuchi; Koichiro Kawaguchi; Kenichi Harada; Yoshikazu Murawaki; Hajime Isomoto
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.