| Literature DB >> 25407612 |
Leonie Klompstra1, Tiny Jaarsma, Anna Strömberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regular daily physical activity is recognised as important in heart failure (HF) patients, but adherence to physical activity is low (<50%). To improve adherence to exercise in HF patients, alternative approaches to motivate and increase self-efficacy to exercise are needed. Therefore, we have studied a new phenomenon: exergames (games to improve physical exercise). The aims of the study were to assess the influence of the exergame platform Nintendo Wii on exercise capacity and daily physical activity in heart failure patients, to study factors related to exercise capacity and daily physical activity, and to assess patients' adherence to exergaming.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25407612 PMCID: PMC4247603 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Demographic and clinical variables
| Total group | |
|---|---|
| N = 32 | |
|
| 63 (±14, 29–88)* |
|
| 10 (31%) |
|
| |
| - Higher than high school | 18 (57%) |
|
| |
| - Married/in a relationship | 27 (90%) |
|
| 29 (97%) |
|
| 23 (82%) |
|
| |
| - NYHAII | 22 (71%) |
| - NYHA III | 9 (29%) |
|
| |
| - Less than 1 year | 15 (47%) |
|
| 1 (4%) |
|
| |
| - One glass or less a week | 15 (52%) |
|
| 10 (31%) |
|
| 29 (±4) |
|
| 25 (78%) |
|
| 5 (±3) |
|
| 4 (±3) |
|
| 6 (±2) |
|
| 2 (±1) |
|
| 500 (±93) |
*n (±SD, Range).
**BMI, Body Mass Index.
Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous data, and absolute numbers and percentages were computed for nominal variables.
Differences between patients who increased in exercise capacity (6MWT) after 12 weeks’ access to the Wii compared to patients who decreased in exercise capacity
| ↓6MWT* | ↑6MWT** | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 9 | N = 18 | p-value | |
|
| 67 (±17) | 61 (±13) | .370 |
|
| 3 (33%) | 7 (39%) | .580 |
|
| .109 | ||
| - Higher than high school | 4 (44%) | 13 (72%) | |
|
| .308 | ||
| - Married/in a relationship | 9 (100%) | 16 (89%) | |
|
| 9 (100%) | 17 (94%) | .480 |
|
| 7 (78%) | 14 (78%) | .782 |
|
| .021 | ||
| - NYHAII | 4 (44%) | 14 (78%) | |
| - NYHA III | 5 (56%) | 4 (22%) | |
|
| .043 | ||
| - Less than 1 year | 2 (22%) | 10 (56%) | |
|
| 0 | 1 (6%) | .651 |
|
| .448 | ||
| - One glass or less a week | 4 (44%) | 10 (56%) | |
|
| 3 (33%) | 4 (22%) | .542 |
|
| 27 (±5) | 30 (±4) | .138 |
|
| 5 (55%) | 15 (93%) | .132 |
|
| 7 (±4) | 5 (±3) | .088 |
|
| 4 (±2) | 3 (±3) | .492 |
|
| 6 (±2) | 6 (±2) | .667 |
|
| 2 (±1) | 2 (±1) | .199 |
|
| 28 (±15) | 27 (±14) | .910 |
*↓ Decrease.
**↑ Increase.
**BMI, Body Mass Index.
The data was analysed by Kruskal-Wallis analysis, Student´s t-test where appropriate, means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous data, and absolute numbers and percentages were computed for nominal variables.
Figure 1Mean amount of Kilo Joules expended a day for each of the 12 weeks in the study (A) and the mean amount of minutes exergaming a day for each of the 12 weeks in the study (B).
Differences between patients who increased in the number of minutes spent exergaming per day after the 12-week intervention compared to patients who decreased in the number of minutes spent exergaming per day
| ↓minutes exergaming than median N = 15* | ↑minutes exergaming than median N = 15** | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | |||
|
| 63 (±15) | 65 (±14) | .370 |
|
| 7 (47%) | 3 (20%) | .160 |
|
| .066 | ||
| - Higher than high school | 12 (80%) | 6 (40%) | |
|
| .082 | ||
| - Married/in a relationship | 12 (80%) | 14 (93%) | |
|
| 14 (93%) | 14 (93%) | .334 |
|
| 10 (67%) | 13 (87%) | .024 |
|
| .392 | ||
| - NYHAII | 11 (73%) | 9 (60%) | |
| - NYHA III | 4 (27%) | 5 (33%) | |
|
| .472 | ||
| - Less than 1 year | 8 (53%) | 6 (40%) | |
|
| 0 | 1 (7%) | .283 |
|
| .516 | ||
| - One glass or less a week | 9 (60%) | 6 (40%) | |
|
| 3 (20%) | 5 (33%) | .417 |
|
| 30 (±5) | 28 (±4) | .284 |
|
| 12 (80%) | 11(74%) | .671 |
|
| 5 (±3) | 6 (±4) | .437 |
|
| 4 (±3) | 3 (±2) | .440 |
|
| 6 (±2) | 6 (±2) | .610 |
|
| 2 (±1) | 2 (±1) | .944 |
|
| 503 (±98) | 493 (±95) | .770 |
|
| 516 (±115) | 525 (±87) | .804 |
|
| 9(±70) | 33(±78) | .402 |
*↓ Decrease.
**↑ Increase.
**BMI, Body Mass Index.
De was data analysed by Kruskal-Wallis analysis, Student´s t-test where appropriate, means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous data, and absolute numbers and percentages were computed for nominal variables.