Literature DB >> 25399847

Evaluating the generalizability of a large streamlined cardiovascular trial: comparing hospitals and patients in the dual antiplatelet therapy study versus the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Robert W Yeh1, Matthew J Czarny2, Sharon-Lise T Normand2, Dean J Kereiakes2, David R Holmes2, Ralph G Brindis2, W Douglas Weaver2, John S Rumsfeld2, Matthew T Roe2, Sunghee Kim2, Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp2, Laura Mauri2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study is large streamlined clinical trial designed to evaluate antiplatelet treatment strategies in a broadly inclusive population of subjects treated with coronary stents. Whether large streamlined trials can successfully include a representative group of study sites and patients has not been formally assessed. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry, we compared characteristics and outcomes of hospitals participating versus not participating in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study. We also compared clinical and procedural characteristics of trial subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents to contemporaneous patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. Standardized differences between groups were estimated. Between September 2009 and July 2011, 1.1 million PCIs were performed among 1276 hospitals, of which 309 (24.2%) participated in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study. Participating hospitals were larger (468 versus 311 beds), more frequently located in urban settings (61.2% versus 42.6%), and had higher annual PCI volumes (858 versus 378) compared with nonparticipating hospitals, although hospital case mix and procedural outcomes were similar. Compared with CathPCI patients, trial patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents were similar with respect to race, sex, and rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking, although they had lower rates of prior cardiovascular disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study, clinical trial sites had similar patient case mix and clinical outcomes as nonparticipating sites. Although trial participants were representative of PCI patients with respect to race, sex and most comorbidities, they had a lower prevalence of chronic cardiovascular disease compared with registry patients. Although a streamlined cardiovascular clinical trial may successfully involve a large number of hospitals and rapidly enroll a diverse population of patients, differences between eligible patients and those actually enrolled remained. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00977938.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; coronary disease; methods; stents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25399847      PMCID: PMC4303486          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  25 in total

1.  Rationale and design of the TAXUS Libertē Post-Approval Study: examination of patients receiving the TAXUS Liberté stent with concomitant prasugrel therapy in routine interventional cardiology practice.

Authors:  Kirk N Garratt; David P Lee; Eileen M Rose; Kellie J Windle; Hsini Liao; Chuke E Nwachuku; Kenneth J Winters; Thomas S Bowman; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Coronary stents and chronic anticoagulation.

Authors:  Angelos Sourgounis; Janusz Lipiecki; Ted S Lo; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012.

Authors:  John C Messenger; Kalon K L Ho; Christopher H Young; Lara E Slattery; Jasmine C Draoui; Jeptha P Curtis; Gregory J Dehmer; Frederick L Grover; Michael J Mirro; Matthew R Reynolds; Ivan C Rokos; John A Spertus; Tracy Y Wang; Stuart A Winston; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women).

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Sunil V Rao; David F Kong; Laura H Aberle; Kevin J Anstrom; C Michael Gibson; Ian C Gilchrist; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjit S Jolly; Roxana Mehran; John C Messenger; L Kristin Newby; Ron Waksman; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Evaluating the 'all-comers' design: a comparison of participants in two 'all-comers' PCI trials with non-participants.

Authors:  Sanneke P M de Boer; Mattie J Lenzen; Rohit M Oemrawsingh; Cihan Simsek; Henricus J Duckers; Willem J van der Giessen; Patrick W Serruys; Eric Boersma
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Comparative effectiveness research: does one size fit all?

Authors:  Lauren M Kunz; Robert W Yeh; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Evidence of systematic duplication by new percutaneous coronary intervention programs.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Jason Nelson; David M Kent; John L Griffith
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-07-09

9.  Rationale and design of the dual antiplatelet therapy study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with either drug-eluting stent or bare metal stent placement for the treatment of coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Laura Mauri; Dean J Kereiakes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Stephen D Wiviott; David J Cohen; David R Holmes; Sripal Bangalore; Donald E Cutlip; Michael Pencina; Joseph M Massaro
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  D J Harris; P S Douglas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Antiplatelet therapy: risks and benefits of extended DAPT after stenting.

Authors:  Karina Huynh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Demonstrating the Value of Outcomes in Echocardiography: Imaging-Based Registries in Improving Patient Care.

Authors:  Jordan B Strom; Varsha K Tanguturi; Sherif F Nagueh; Allan L Klein; Warren J Manning
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Benefits and Risks of Extended Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After PCI in Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Robert W Yeh; Dean J Kereiakes; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Stephan Windecker; Michael J Rinaldi; Anthony H Gershlick; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Alice Jacobs; Stephen D Wiviott; Joseph M Massaro; Adrian C Iancu; Laura Mauri
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Global geographical variation in patient characteristics in percutaneous coronary intervention clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eden Liu; Leon Hsueh; Hajwa Kim; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Mortality Following Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events Occurring Beyond 1 Year After Coronary Stenting: A Secondary Analysis of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study.

Authors:  Eric A Secemsky; Robert W Yeh; Dean J Kereiakes; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; P Gabriel Steg; Christopher P Cannon; Patricia K Apruzzese; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joseph M Massaro; Laura Mauri
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Estimation of DAPT Study Treatment Effects in Contemporary Clinical Practice: Findings From the EXTEND-DAPT Study.

Authors:  Neel M Butala; Kamil F Faridi; Hector Tamez; Jordan B Strom; Yang Song; Changyu Shen; Eric A Secemsky; Laura Mauri; Dean J Kereiakes; Jeptha P Curtis; C Michael Gibson; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  External validity of the "all-comers" design: insights from the BIOSCIENCE trial.

Authors:  Anna Franzone; Dik Heg; Lorenz Räber; Marco Valgimigli; Raffaele Piccolo; Thomas Zanchin; Kyohei Yamaji; Stefan Stortecky; Stefan Blöchlinger; Lukas Hunziker; Fabien Praz; Peter Jüni; Stephan Windecker; Thomas Pilgrim
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Validating the use of registries and claims data to support randomized trials: Rationale and design of the Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study.

Authors:  Jordan B Strom; Hector Tamez; Yuansong Zhao; Linda R Valsdottir; Jeptha Curtis; J Matthew Brennan; Changyu Shen; Jeffrey J Popma; Laura Mauri; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Blinded Validation of Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer, a Potential Ancillary to Chest CT Screening.

Authors:  Michael Phillips; Thomas L Bauer; Renee N Cataneo; Cassie Lebauer; Mayur Mundada; Harvey I Pass; Naren Ramakrishna; William N Rom; Eric Vallières
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implications of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial for US clinical practice.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Gregory P Hess; Patrick Stewart; Ehrin J Armstrong; Steven A Farmer; Jason H Wasfy; Javier Alfonso Valle; Amneet Sandhu; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.